* Migration from docker to standalone server Migration handling Fixed tests Use simpler in-memory storage Support for concurrent logging to disk Simplified direct connections to localhost * Migration from docker / redis to standalone script Updated tests Updated run script Fixed requirements Use dotenv Ask if user would like to install MCP in Claude Desktop once Updated docs * More cleanup and references to docker removed * Cleanup * Comments * Fixed tests * Fix GitHub Actions workflow for standalone Python architecture - Install requirements-dev.txt for pytest and testing dependencies - Remove Docker setup from simulation tests (now standalone) - Simplify linting job to use requirements-dev.txt - Update simulation tests to run directly without Docker Fixes unit test failures in CI due to missing pytest dependency. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * Remove simulation tests from GitHub Actions - Removed simulation-tests job that makes real API calls - Keep only unit tests (mocked, no API costs) and linting - Simulation tests should be run manually with real API keys - Reduces CI costs and complexity GitHub Actions now only runs: - Unit tests (569 tests, all mocked) - Code quality checks (ruff, black) 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * Fixed tests * Fixed tests --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
211 lines
7.8 KiB
Python
211 lines
7.8 KiB
Python
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
|
"""
|
|
Cross-Tool Continuation Test
|
|
|
|
Tests comprehensive cross-tool continuation scenarios to ensure
|
|
conversation context is maintained when switching between different tools.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from .conversation_base_test import ConversationBaseTest
|
|
|
|
|
|
class CrossToolContinuationTest(ConversationBaseTest):
|
|
"""Test comprehensive cross-tool continuation scenarios"""
|
|
|
|
@property
|
|
def test_name(self) -> str:
|
|
return "cross_tool_continuation"
|
|
|
|
@property
|
|
def test_description(self) -> str:
|
|
return "Cross-tool conversation continuation scenarios"
|
|
|
|
def run_test(self) -> bool:
|
|
"""Test comprehensive cross-tool continuation scenarios"""
|
|
try:
|
|
self.logger.info("🔧 Test: Cross-tool continuation scenarios")
|
|
|
|
# Setup test environment for conversation testing
|
|
self.setUp()
|
|
|
|
success_count = 0
|
|
total_scenarios = 3
|
|
|
|
# Scenario 1: chat -> thinkdeep -> codereview
|
|
if self._test_chat_thinkdeep_codereview():
|
|
success_count += 1
|
|
|
|
# Scenario 2: analyze -> debug -> thinkdeep
|
|
if self._test_analyze_debug_thinkdeep():
|
|
success_count += 1
|
|
|
|
# Scenario 3: Multi-file cross-tool continuation
|
|
if self._test_multi_file_continuation():
|
|
success_count += 1
|
|
|
|
self.logger.info(
|
|
f" ✅ Cross-tool continuation scenarios completed: {success_count}/{total_scenarios} scenarios passed"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Consider successful if at least one scenario worked
|
|
return success_count > 0
|
|
|
|
except Exception as e:
|
|
self.logger.error(f"Cross-tool continuation test failed: {e}")
|
|
return False
|
|
finally:
|
|
self.cleanup_test_files()
|
|
|
|
def _test_chat_thinkdeep_codereview(self) -> bool:
|
|
"""Test chat -> thinkdeep -> codereview scenario"""
|
|
try:
|
|
self.logger.info(" 1: Testing chat -> thinkdeep -> codereview")
|
|
|
|
# Start with chat
|
|
chat_response, chat_id = self.call_mcp_tool_direct(
|
|
"chat",
|
|
{
|
|
"prompt": "Please use low thinking mode. Look at this Python code and tell me what you think about it",
|
|
"files": [self.test_files["python"]],
|
|
"model": "flash",
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
if not chat_response or not chat_id:
|
|
self.logger.error("Failed to start chat conversation")
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
# Continue with thinkdeep
|
|
thinkdeep_response, _ = self.call_mcp_tool_direct(
|
|
"thinkdeep",
|
|
{
|
|
"prompt": "Please use low thinking mode. Think deeply about potential performance issues in this code",
|
|
"files": [self.test_files["python"]], # Same file should be deduplicated
|
|
"continuation_id": chat_id,
|
|
"model": "flash",
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
if not thinkdeep_response:
|
|
self.logger.error("Failed chat -> thinkdeep continuation")
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
# Continue with codereview
|
|
codereview_response, _ = self.call_mcp_tool_direct(
|
|
"codereview",
|
|
{
|
|
"files": [self.test_files["python"]], # Same file should be deduplicated
|
|
"prompt": "Building on our previous analysis, provide a comprehensive code review",
|
|
"continuation_id": chat_id,
|
|
"model": "flash",
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
if not codereview_response:
|
|
self.logger.error("Failed thinkdeep -> codereview continuation")
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
self.logger.info(" ✅ chat -> thinkdeep -> codereview working")
|
|
return True
|
|
|
|
except Exception as e:
|
|
self.logger.error(f"Chat -> thinkdeep -> codereview scenario failed: {e}")
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
def _test_analyze_debug_thinkdeep(self) -> bool:
|
|
"""Test analyze -> debug -> thinkdeep scenario"""
|
|
try:
|
|
self.logger.info(" 2: Testing analyze -> debug -> thinkdeep")
|
|
|
|
# Start with analyze
|
|
analyze_response, analyze_id = self.call_mcp_tool_direct(
|
|
"analyze",
|
|
{
|
|
"files": [self.test_files["python"]],
|
|
"prompt": "Analyze this code for quality and performance issues",
|
|
"model": "flash",
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
if not analyze_response or not analyze_id:
|
|
self.logger.warning("Failed to start analyze conversation, skipping scenario 2")
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
# Continue with debug
|
|
debug_response, _ = self.call_mcp_tool_direct(
|
|
"debug",
|
|
{
|
|
"files": [self.test_files["python"]], # Same file should be deduplicated
|
|
"prompt": "Based on our analysis, help debug the performance issue in fibonacci",
|
|
"continuation_id": analyze_id,
|
|
"model": "flash",
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
if not debug_response:
|
|
self.logger.warning(" ⚠️ analyze -> debug continuation failed")
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
# Continue with thinkdeep
|
|
final_response, _ = self.call_mcp_tool_direct(
|
|
"thinkdeep",
|
|
{
|
|
"prompt": "Please use low thinking mode. Think deeply about the architectural implications of the issues we've found",
|
|
"files": [self.test_files["python"]], # Same file should be deduplicated
|
|
"continuation_id": analyze_id,
|
|
"model": "flash",
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
if not final_response:
|
|
self.logger.warning(" ⚠️ debug -> thinkdeep continuation failed")
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
self.logger.info(" ✅ analyze -> debug -> thinkdeep working")
|
|
return True
|
|
|
|
except Exception as e:
|
|
self.logger.error(f"Analyze -> debug -> thinkdeep scenario failed: {e}")
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
def _test_multi_file_continuation(self) -> bool:
|
|
"""Test multi-file cross-tool continuation"""
|
|
try:
|
|
self.logger.info(" 3: Testing multi-file cross-tool continuation")
|
|
|
|
# Start with both files
|
|
multi_response, multi_id = self.call_mcp_tool_direct(
|
|
"chat",
|
|
{
|
|
"prompt": "Please use low thinking mode. Analyze both the Python code and configuration file",
|
|
"files": [self.test_files["python"], self.test_files["config"]],
|
|
"model": "flash",
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
if not multi_response or not multi_id:
|
|
self.logger.warning("Failed to start multi-file conversation, skipping scenario 3")
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
# Switch to codereview with same files (should use conversation history)
|
|
multi_review, _ = self.call_mcp_tool_direct(
|
|
"codereview",
|
|
{
|
|
"files": [self.test_files["python"], self.test_files["config"]], # Same files
|
|
"prompt": "Review both files in the context of our previous discussion",
|
|
"continuation_id": multi_id,
|
|
"model": "flash",
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
if not multi_review:
|
|
self.logger.warning(" ⚠️ Multi-file cross-tool continuation failed")
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
self.logger.info(" ✅ Multi-file cross-tool continuation working")
|
|
return True
|
|
|
|
except Exception as e:
|
|
self.logger.error(f"Multi-file continuation scenario failed: {e}")
|
|
return False
|