95556ba9ea
* WIP Refactor resolving mode_names, should be done once at MCP call boundary Pass around model context instead Consensus tool allows one to get a consensus from multiple models, optionally assigning one a 'for' or 'against' stance to find nuanced responses. * Deduplication of model resolution, model_context should be available before reaching deeper parts of the code Improved abstraction when building conversations Throw programmer errors early * Guardrails Support for `model:option` format at MCP boundary so future tools can use additional options if needed instead of handling this only for consensus Model name now supports an optional ":option" for future use * Simplified async flow * Improved model for request to support natural language Simplified async flow * Improved model for request to support natural language Simplified async flow * Fix consensus tool async/sync patterns to match codebase standards CRITICAL FIXES: - Converted _get_consensus_responses from async to sync (matches other tools) - Converted store_conversation_turn from async to sync (add_turn is synchronous) - Removed unnecessary asyncio imports and sleep calls - Fixed ClosedResourceError in MCP protocol during long consensus operations PATTERN ALIGNMENT: - Consensus tool now follows same sync patterns as all other tools - Only execute() and prepare_prompt() are async (base class requirement) - All internal operations are synchronous like analyze, chat, debug, etc. TESTING: - MCP simulation test now passes: consensus_stance ✅ - Two-model consensus works correctly in ~35 seconds - Unknown stance handling defaults to neutral with warnings - All 9 unit tests pass (100% success rate) The consensus tool async patterns were anomalous in the codebase. This fix aligns it with the established synchronous patterns used by all other tools while maintaining full functionality. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * Fixed call order and added new test * Cleanup dead comments Docs for the new tool Improved tests --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
26 lines
668 B
Python
26 lines
668 B
Python
"""
|
|
System prompts for Gemini tools
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from .analyze_prompt import ANALYZE_PROMPT
|
|
from .chat_prompt import CHAT_PROMPT
|
|
from .codereview_prompt import CODEREVIEW_PROMPT
|
|
from .consensus_prompt import CONSENSUS_PROMPT
|
|
from .debug_prompt import DEBUG_ISSUE_PROMPT
|
|
from .precommit_prompt import PRECOMMIT_PROMPT
|
|
from .refactor_prompt import REFACTOR_PROMPT
|
|
from .testgen_prompt import TESTGEN_PROMPT
|
|
from .thinkdeep_prompt import THINKDEEP_PROMPT
|
|
|
|
__all__ = [
|
|
"THINKDEEP_PROMPT",
|
|
"CODEREVIEW_PROMPT",
|
|
"DEBUG_ISSUE_PROMPT",
|
|
"ANALYZE_PROMPT",
|
|
"CHAT_PROMPT",
|
|
"CONSENSUS_PROMPT",
|
|
"PRECOMMIT_PROMPT",
|
|
"REFACTOR_PROMPT",
|
|
"TESTGEN_PROMPT",
|
|
]
|