- Fixed review_changes tool to properly translate host paths to container paths in Docker - Prevents "No such file or directory" errors when running in Docker containers - Added proper error handling with clear messages when paths are inaccessible refactor: Centralized token limit validation across all tools - Added _validate_token_limit method to BaseTool to eliminate code duplication - Reduced ~25 lines of duplicated code across 5 tools (analyze, chat, debug_issue, review_code, think_deeper) - Maintains exact same error messages and behavior feat: Enhanced large prompt handling - Added support for prompts >50K chars by requesting file-based input - Preserves MCP's ~25K token capacity for responses - All tools now check prompt size before processing test: Added comprehensive Docker path integration tests - Tests for path translation, security validation, and error handling - Tests for review_changes tool specifically with Docker paths - Fixed failing think_deeper test (updated default from "max" to "high") chore: Code quality improvements - Applied black formatting across all files - Fixed import sorting with isort - All tests passing (96 tests) - Standardized error handling follows MCP TextContent format The changes ensure consistent behavior across all environments while reducing code duplication and improving maintainability. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
214 lines
7.9 KiB
Python
214 lines
7.9 KiB
Python
"""
|
|
Think Deeper tool - Extended reasoning and problem-solving
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from typing import Any, Dict, List, Optional
|
|
|
|
from mcp.types import TextContent
|
|
from pydantic import Field
|
|
|
|
from config import TEMPERATURE_CREATIVE
|
|
from prompts import THINK_DEEPER_PROMPT
|
|
from utils import read_files
|
|
|
|
from .base import BaseTool, ToolRequest
|
|
from .models import ToolOutput
|
|
|
|
|
|
class ThinkDeeperRequest(ToolRequest):
|
|
"""Request model for think_deeper tool"""
|
|
|
|
current_analysis: str = Field(
|
|
..., description="Claude's current thinking/analysis to extend"
|
|
)
|
|
problem_context: Optional[str] = Field(
|
|
None, description="Additional context about the problem or goal"
|
|
)
|
|
focus_areas: Optional[List[str]] = Field(
|
|
None,
|
|
description="Specific aspects to focus on (architecture, performance, security, etc.)",
|
|
)
|
|
files: Optional[List[str]] = Field(
|
|
None,
|
|
description="Optional file paths or directories for additional context (must be absolute paths)",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
class ThinkDeeperTool(BaseTool):
|
|
"""Extended thinking and reasoning tool"""
|
|
|
|
def get_name(self) -> str:
|
|
return "think_deeper"
|
|
|
|
def get_description(self) -> str:
|
|
return (
|
|
"EXTENDED THINKING & REASONING - Your deep thinking partner for complex problems. "
|
|
"Use this when you need to extend your analysis, explore alternatives, or validate approaches. "
|
|
"Perfect for: architecture decisions, complex bugs, performance challenges, security analysis. "
|
|
"Triggers: 'think deeper', 'ultrathink', 'extend my analysis', 'explore alternatives'. "
|
|
"I'll challenge assumptions, find edge cases, and provide alternative solutions. "
|
|
"IMPORTANT: Choose the appropriate thinking_mode based on task complexity - "
|
|
"'low' for quick analysis, 'medium' for standard problems, 'high' for complex issues (default), "
|
|
"'max' for extremely complex challenges requiring deepest analysis. "
|
|
"When in doubt, err on the side of a higher mode for truly deep thought and evaluation."
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
def get_input_schema(self) -> Dict[str, Any]:
|
|
return {
|
|
"type": "object",
|
|
"properties": {
|
|
"current_analysis": {
|
|
"type": "string",
|
|
"description": "Your current thinking/analysis to extend and validate",
|
|
},
|
|
"problem_context": {
|
|
"type": "string",
|
|
"description": "Additional context about the problem or goal",
|
|
},
|
|
"focus_areas": {
|
|
"type": "array",
|
|
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
|
"description": "Specific aspects to focus on (architecture, performance, security, etc.)",
|
|
},
|
|
"files": {
|
|
"type": "array",
|
|
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
|
"description": "Optional file paths or directories for additional context (must be absolute paths)",
|
|
},
|
|
"temperature": {
|
|
"type": "number",
|
|
"description": "Temperature for creative thinking (0-1, default 0.7)",
|
|
"minimum": 0,
|
|
"maximum": 1,
|
|
},
|
|
"thinking_mode": {
|
|
"type": "string",
|
|
"enum": ["minimal", "low", "medium", "high", "max"],
|
|
"description": "Thinking depth: minimal (128), low (2048), medium (8192), high (16384), max (32768)",
|
|
"default": "high",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"required": ["current_analysis"],
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
def get_system_prompt(self) -> str:
|
|
return THINK_DEEPER_PROMPT
|
|
|
|
def get_default_temperature(self) -> float:
|
|
return TEMPERATURE_CREATIVE
|
|
|
|
def get_default_thinking_mode(self) -> str:
|
|
"""ThinkDeeper uses high thinking by default"""
|
|
return "high"
|
|
|
|
def get_request_model(self):
|
|
return ThinkDeeperRequest
|
|
|
|
async def execute(self, arguments: Dict[str, Any]) -> List[TextContent]:
|
|
"""Override execute to check current_analysis size before processing"""
|
|
# First validate request
|
|
request_model = self.get_request_model()
|
|
request = request_model(**arguments)
|
|
|
|
# Check current_analysis size
|
|
size_check = self.check_prompt_size(request.current_analysis)
|
|
if size_check:
|
|
return [
|
|
TextContent(
|
|
type="text", text=ToolOutput(**size_check).model_dump_json()
|
|
)
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
# Continue with normal execution
|
|
return await super().execute(arguments)
|
|
|
|
async def prepare_prompt(self, request: ThinkDeeperRequest) -> str:
|
|
"""Prepare the full prompt for extended thinking"""
|
|
# Check for prompt.txt in files
|
|
prompt_content, updated_files = self.handle_prompt_file(request.files)
|
|
|
|
# Use prompt.txt content if available, otherwise use the current_analysis field
|
|
current_analysis = (
|
|
prompt_content if prompt_content else request.current_analysis
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Update request files list
|
|
if updated_files is not None:
|
|
request.files = updated_files
|
|
|
|
# Build context parts
|
|
context_parts = [
|
|
f"=== CLAUDE'S CURRENT ANALYSIS ===\n{current_analysis}\n=== END ANALYSIS ==="
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
if request.problem_context:
|
|
context_parts.append(
|
|
f"\n=== PROBLEM CONTEXT ===\n{request.problem_context}\n=== END CONTEXT ==="
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Add reference files if provided
|
|
if request.files:
|
|
file_content, _ = read_files(request.files)
|
|
context_parts.append(
|
|
f"\n=== REFERENCE FILES ===\n{file_content}\n=== END FILES ==="
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
full_context = "\n".join(context_parts)
|
|
|
|
# Check token limits
|
|
self._validate_token_limit(full_context, "Context")
|
|
|
|
# Add focus areas instruction if specified
|
|
focus_instruction = ""
|
|
if request.focus_areas:
|
|
areas = ", ".join(request.focus_areas)
|
|
focus_instruction = (
|
|
f"\n\nFOCUS AREAS: Please pay special attention to {areas} aspects."
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Combine system prompt with context
|
|
full_prompt = f"""{self.get_system_prompt()}{focus_instruction}
|
|
|
|
{full_context}
|
|
|
|
Please provide deep analysis that extends Claude's thinking with:
|
|
1. Alternative approaches and solutions
|
|
2. Edge cases and potential failure modes
|
|
3. Critical evaluation of assumptions
|
|
4. Concrete implementation suggestions
|
|
5. Risk assessment and mitigation strategies"""
|
|
|
|
return full_prompt
|
|
|
|
def format_response(self, response: str, request: ThinkDeeperRequest) -> str:
|
|
"""Format the response with clear attribution and critical thinking prompt"""
|
|
return f"""## Extended Analysis by Gemini
|
|
|
|
{response}
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Critical Evaluation Required
|
|
|
|
Claude, now that you've received Gemini's extended analysis, please:
|
|
|
|
1. **Critically evaluate each suggestion** - Which points are truly valuable? Which might have limitations or trade-offs?
|
|
|
|
2. **Consider technical constraints** - How do these suggestions fit with:
|
|
- Existing codebase patterns and conventions
|
|
- Performance and scalability requirements
|
|
- Security implications and best practices
|
|
- Architecture and design principles
|
|
|
|
3. **Identify potential risks** - What could go wrong with each approach? Are there hidden complexities or edge cases?
|
|
|
|
4. **Synthesize your final recommendation** - Based on:
|
|
- Your original analysis
|
|
- Gemini's suggestions and critiques
|
|
- Technical feasibility and correctness
|
|
- A balanced assessment of trade-offs
|
|
|
|
5. **Formulate your conclusion** - What is the best technical solution considering all perspectives?
|
|
|
|
Remember: Gemini's analysis is meant to challenge and extend your thinking, not replace it. Use these insights to arrive at a more robust, well-considered solution."""
|