Files
my-pal-mcp-server/tools/thinkdeep.py
Beehive Innovations 4151c3c3a5 Migration from Docker to Standalone Python Server (#73)
* Migration from docker to standalone server
Migration handling
Fixed tests
Use simpler in-memory storage
Support for concurrent logging to disk
Simplified direct connections to localhost

* Migration from docker / redis to standalone script
Updated tests
Updated run script
Fixed requirements
Use dotenv
Ask if user would like to install MCP in Claude Desktop once
Updated docs

* More cleanup and references to docker removed

* Cleanup

* Comments

* Fixed tests

* Fix GitHub Actions workflow for standalone Python architecture

- Install requirements-dev.txt for pytest and testing dependencies
- Remove Docker setup from simulation tests (now standalone)
- Simplify linting job to use requirements-dev.txt
- Update simulation tests to run directly without Docker

Fixes unit test failures in CI due to missing pytest dependency.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Remove simulation tests from GitHub Actions

- Removed simulation-tests job that makes real API calls
- Keep only unit tests (mocked, no API costs) and linting
- Simulation tests should be run manually with real API keys
- Reduces CI costs and complexity

GitHub Actions now only runs:
- Unit tests (569 tests, all mocked)
- Code quality checks (ruff, black)

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Fixed tests

* Fixed tests

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-06-18 23:41:22 +04:00

235 lines
11 KiB
Python

"""
ThinkDeep tool - Extended reasoning and problem-solving
"""
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Any, Optional
from pydantic import Field
if TYPE_CHECKING:
from tools.models import ToolModelCategory
from config import TEMPERATURE_CREATIVE
from systemprompts import THINKDEEP_PROMPT
from .base import BaseTool, ToolRequest
# Field descriptions to avoid duplication between Pydantic and JSON schema
THINKDEEP_FIELD_DESCRIPTIONS = {
"prompt": (
"MANDATORY: you MUST first think hard and establish a deep understanding of the topic and question by thinking through all "
"relevant details, context, constraints, and implications. Provide your thought-partner all of your current thinking/analysis "
"to extend and validate. Share these extended thoughts and ideas in "
"the prompt so your assistant has comprehensive information to work with for the best analysis."
),
"problem_context": "Provate additional context about the problem or goal. Be as expressive as possible. More information will "
"be very helpful to your thought-partner.",
"focus_areas": "Specific aspects to focus on (architecture, performance, security, etc.)",
"files": "Optional absolute file paths or directories for additional context (must be FULL absolute paths to real files / folders - DO NOT SHORTEN)",
"images": "Optional images for visual analysis - diagrams, charts, system architectures, or any visual information to analyze. "
"(must be FULL absolute paths to real files / folders - DO NOT SHORTEN)",
}
class ThinkDeepRequest(ToolRequest):
"""Request model for thinkdeep tool"""
prompt: str = Field(..., description=THINKDEEP_FIELD_DESCRIPTIONS["prompt"])
problem_context: Optional[str] = Field(None, description=THINKDEEP_FIELD_DESCRIPTIONS["problem_context"])
focus_areas: Optional[list[str]] = Field(None, description=THINKDEEP_FIELD_DESCRIPTIONS["focus_areas"])
files: Optional[list[str]] = Field(None, description=THINKDEEP_FIELD_DESCRIPTIONS["files"])
images: Optional[list[str]] = Field(None, description=THINKDEEP_FIELD_DESCRIPTIONS["images"])
class ThinkDeepTool(BaseTool):
"""Extended thinking and reasoning tool"""
def get_name(self) -> str:
return "thinkdeep"
def get_description(self) -> str:
return (
"EXTENDED THINKING & REASONING - Your deep thinking partner for complex problems. "
"Use this when you need to think deeper about a problem, extend your analysis, explore alternatives, or validate approaches. "
"Perfect for: architecture decisions, complex bugs, performance challenges, security analysis. "
"I'll challenge assumptions, find edge cases, and provide alternative solutions. "
"IMPORTANT: Choose the appropriate thinking_mode based on task complexity - "
"'low' for quick analysis, 'medium' for standard problems, 'high' for complex issues (default), "
"'max' for extremely complex challenges requiring deepest analysis. "
"When in doubt, err on the side of a higher mode for truly deep thought and evaluation. "
"Note: If you're not currently using a top-tier model such as Opus 4 or above, these tools can provide enhanced capabilities."
)
def get_input_schema(self) -> dict[str, Any]:
schema = {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"prompt": {
"type": "string",
"description": THINKDEEP_FIELD_DESCRIPTIONS["prompt"],
},
"model": self.get_model_field_schema(),
"problem_context": {
"type": "string",
"description": THINKDEEP_FIELD_DESCRIPTIONS["problem_context"],
},
"focus_areas": {
"type": "array",
"items": {"type": "string"},
"description": THINKDEEP_FIELD_DESCRIPTIONS["focus_areas"],
},
"files": {
"type": "array",
"items": {"type": "string"},
"description": THINKDEEP_FIELD_DESCRIPTIONS["files"],
},
"images": {
"type": "array",
"items": {"type": "string"},
"description": THINKDEEP_FIELD_DESCRIPTIONS["images"],
},
"temperature": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Temperature for creative thinking (0-1, default 0.7)",
"minimum": 0,
"maximum": 1,
},
"thinking_mode": {
"type": "string",
"enum": ["minimal", "low", "medium", "high", "max"],
"description": f"Thinking depth: minimal (0.5% of model max), low (8%), medium (33%), high (67%), max (100% of model max). Defaults to '{self.get_default_thinking_mode()}' if not specified.",
},
"use_websearch": {
"type": "boolean",
"description": "Enable web search for documentation, best practices, and current information. Particularly useful for: brainstorming sessions, architectural design discussions, exploring industry best practices, working with specific frameworks/technologies, researching solutions to complex problems, or when current documentation and community insights would enhance the analysis.",
"default": True,
},
"continuation_id": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Thread continuation ID for multi-turn conversations. Can be used to continue conversations across different tools. Only provide this if continuing a previous conversation thread.",
},
},
"required": ["prompt"] + (["model"] if self.is_effective_auto_mode() else []),
}
return schema
def get_system_prompt(self) -> str:
return THINKDEEP_PROMPT
def get_default_temperature(self) -> float:
return TEMPERATURE_CREATIVE
def get_default_thinking_mode(self) -> str:
"""ThinkDeep uses configurable thinking mode, defaults to high"""
from config import DEFAULT_THINKING_MODE_THINKDEEP
return DEFAULT_THINKING_MODE_THINKDEEP
def get_model_category(self) -> "ToolModelCategory":
"""ThinkDeep requires extended reasoning capabilities"""
from tools.models import ToolModelCategory
return ToolModelCategory.EXTENDED_REASONING
def get_request_model(self):
return ThinkDeepRequest
async def prepare_prompt(self, request: ThinkDeepRequest) -> str:
"""Prepare the full prompt for extended thinking"""
# Check for prompt.txt in files
prompt_content, updated_files = self.handle_prompt_file(request.files)
# Use prompt.txt content if available, otherwise use the prompt field
current_analysis = prompt_content if prompt_content else request.prompt
# Check user input size at MCP transport boundary (before adding internal content)
size_check = self.check_prompt_size(current_analysis)
if size_check:
from tools.models import ToolOutput
raise ValueError(f"MCP_SIZE_CHECK:{ToolOutput(**size_check).model_dump_json()}")
# Update request files list
if updated_files is not None:
request.files = updated_files
# File size validation happens at MCP boundary in server.py
# Build context parts
context_parts = [f"=== CLAUDE'S CURRENT ANALYSIS ===\n{current_analysis}\n=== END ANALYSIS ==="]
if request.problem_context:
context_parts.append(f"\n=== PROBLEM CONTEXT ===\n{request.problem_context}\n=== END CONTEXT ===")
# Add reference files if provided
if request.files:
# Use centralized file processing logic
continuation_id = getattr(request, "continuation_id", None)
file_content, processed_files = self._prepare_file_content_for_prompt(
request.files, continuation_id, "Reference files"
)
self._actually_processed_files = processed_files
if file_content:
context_parts.append(f"\n=== REFERENCE FILES ===\n{file_content}\n=== END FILES ===")
full_context = "\n".join(context_parts)
# Check token limits
self._validate_token_limit(full_context, "Context")
# Add focus areas instruction if specified
focus_instruction = ""
if request.focus_areas:
areas = ", ".join(request.focus_areas)
focus_instruction = f"\n\nFOCUS AREAS: Please pay special attention to {areas} aspects."
# Add web search instruction if enabled
websearch_instruction = self.get_websearch_instruction(
request.use_websearch,
"""When analyzing complex problems, consider if searches for these would help:
- Current documentation for specific technologies, frameworks, or APIs mentioned
- Known issues, workarounds, or community solutions for similar problems
- Recent updates, deprecations, or best practices that might affect the approach
- Official sources to verify assumptions or clarify technical details""",
)
# Combine system prompt with context
full_prompt = f"""{self.get_system_prompt()}{focus_instruction}{websearch_instruction}
{full_context}
Please provide deep analysis that extends Claude's thinking with:
1. Alternative approaches and solutions
2. Edge cases and potential failure modes
3. Critical evaluation of assumptions
4. Concrete implementation suggestions
5. Risk assessment and mitigation strategies"""
return full_prompt
def format_response(self, response: str, request: ThinkDeepRequest, model_info: Optional[dict] = None) -> str:
"""Format the response with clear attribution and critical thinking prompt"""
# Get the friendly model name
model_name = "your fellow developer"
if model_info and model_info.get("model_response"):
model_name = model_info["model_response"].friendly_name or "your fellow developer"
return f"""{response}
---
## Critical Evaluation Required
Claude, please critically evaluate {model_name}'s analysis by thinking hard about the following:
1. **Technical merit** - Which suggestions are valuable vs. have limitations?
2. **Constraints** - Fit with codebase patterns, performance, security, architecture
3. **Risks** - Hidden complexities, edge cases, potential failure modes
4. **Final recommendation** - Synthesize both perspectives, then ultrathink on your own to explore additional
considerations and arrive at the best technical solution. Feel free to use zen's chat tool for a follow-up discussion
if needed.
Remember: Use {model_name}'s insights to enhance, not replace, your analysis."""