- Fixed review_changes tool to properly translate host paths to container paths in Docker
- Prevents "No such file or directory" errors when running in Docker containers
- Added proper error handling with clear messages when paths are inaccessible
refactor: Centralized token limit validation across all tools
- Added _validate_token_limit method to BaseTool to eliminate code duplication
- Reduced ~25 lines of duplicated code across 5 tools (analyze, chat, debug_issue, review_code, think_deeper)
- Maintains exact same error messages and behavior
feat: Enhanced large prompt handling
- Added support for prompts >50K chars by requesting file-based input
- Preserves MCP's ~25K token capacity for responses
- All tools now check prompt size before processing
test: Added comprehensive Docker path integration tests
- Tests for path translation, security validation, and error handling
- Tests for review_changes tool specifically with Docker paths
- Fixed failing think_deeper test (updated default from "max" to "high")
chore: Code quality improvements
- Applied black formatting across all files
- Fixed import sorting with isort
- All tests passing (96 tests)
- Standardized error handling follows MCP TextContent format
The changes ensure consistent behavior across all environments while reducing code duplication and improving maintainability.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add instruction for Gemini to request files when needed
- Add comprehensive tests for files parameter functionality
- Test file request instruction presence/absence based on context
- Run all tests, ruff, and black formatting
Now review_changes can both accept context files and allow Gemini
to request additional files during review for better validation.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add files parameter to provide additional context during review
- Context files help validate if changes align with existing patterns
- Files are processed after diffs to prioritize actual changes for token budget
- Clear section headers and summaries show what context was included
- Handles token limits gracefully with truncation when needed
This allows users to provide config files, docs, or related code that
helps Gemini better understand and validate the changes being reviewed.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Renamed tool from review_pending_changes to review_changes for brevity
- Enhanced tool descriptions for better MCP auto-discovery
- Updated all references throughout codebase including:
- Tool implementation (tools/review_changes.py)
- Test files (tests/test_review_changes.py)
- Server registration and imports
- Documentation in README.md
- Tool prompts in prompts/tool_prompts.py
- Enhanced review_changes description to emphasize pre-commit usage
- All tests pass, linting and formatting checks pass
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
