Add comprehensive technology-specific review categories and instructions to analyze codebase technology stack before reviewing. This enhancement will provide more targeted and relevant code reviews by adapting to different frameworks and patterns.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Renamed `think_deeper` tool to `thinkdeep` for shorter, cleaner naming
- Updated all imports from ThinkDeeperTool to ThinkDeepTool
- Updated all references from THINK_DEEPER_PROMPT to THINKDEEP_PROMPT
- Updated tool registration in server.py
- Updated all test files to use new naming convention
- Updated README documentation to reflect new tool names
- All functionality remains the same, only naming has changed
This completes the tool renaming refactor for improved clarity and consistency.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Renamed `review_code` tool to `codereview` for better naming convention
- Renamed `review_changes` tool to `precommit` to better reflect its purpose
- Updated all tool descriptions to remove "Triggers:" sections and improve clarity
- Updated all imports and references throughout the codebase
- Renamed test files to match new tool names
- Updated server.py tool registrations
- All existing functionality preserved with improved naming
This refactoring improves code organization and makes tool purposes clearer.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Fixed review_changes tool to properly translate host paths to container paths in Docker
- Prevents "No such file or directory" errors when running in Docker containers
- Added proper error handling with clear messages when paths are inaccessible
refactor: Centralized token limit validation across all tools
- Added _validate_token_limit method to BaseTool to eliminate code duplication
- Reduced ~25 lines of duplicated code across 5 tools (analyze, chat, debug_issue, review_code, think_deeper)
- Maintains exact same error messages and behavior
feat: Enhanced large prompt handling
- Added support for prompts >50K chars by requesting file-based input
- Preserves MCP's ~25K token capacity for responses
- All tools now check prompt size before processing
test: Added comprehensive Docker path integration tests
- Tests for path translation, security validation, and error handling
- Tests for review_changes tool specifically with Docker paths
- Fixed failing think_deeper test (updated default from "max" to "high")
chore: Code quality improvements
- Applied black formatting across all files
- Fixed import sorting with isort
- All tests passing (96 tests)
- Standardized error handling follows MCP TextContent format
The changes ensure consistent behavior across all environments while reducing code duplication and improving maintainability.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Prioritized security analysis in all tool prompts
- Fixed REVIEW_CHANGES_PROMPT to apply security checks to ALL code, not just new additions
- Added comprehensive security categories to REVIEW_CODE_PROMPT including:
- Authentication/authorization flaws
- Input validation vulnerabilities
- Injection risks (SQL, NoSQL, Command, XSS, etc.)
- Sensitive data exposure
- Cryptographic weaknesses
- API security issues
- Reordered THINK_DEEPER_PROMPT priorities to emphasize security first
- Added security impact assessment to DEBUG_ISSUE_PROMPT format
- Prioritized security considerations in ANALYZE_PROMPT
These changes ensure that all tools properly emphasize security analysis
as a critical priority rather than minimizing or limiting security focus.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Renamed tool from review_pending_changes to review_changes for brevity
- Enhanced tool descriptions for better MCP auto-discovery
- Updated all references throughout codebase including:
- Tool implementation (tools/review_changes.py)
- Test files (tests/test_review_changes.py)
- Server registration and imports
- Documentation in README.md
- Tool prompts in prompts/tool_prompts.py
- Enhanced review_changes description to emphasize pre-commit usage
- All tests pass, linting and formatting checks pass
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add new review_pending_changes tool for comprehensive pre-commit reviews
- Implement filesystem sandboxing with MCP_PROJECT_ROOT
- Enforce absolute paths for all file/directory operations
- Add comprehensive git utilities for repository management
- Update all tools to use centralized path validation
- Add extensive test coverage for new features and security model
- Update documentation with new tool and path requirements
- Remove obsolete demo and guide files
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add collaboration demo showing dynamic context requests
- Implement chat tool for general conversations and brainstorming
- Add tool selection guide with clear boundaries
- Introduce models configuration system
- Update prompts for better tool descriptions
- Refactor server to remove redundant functionality
- Add comprehensive tests for collaboration features
- Enhance base tool with collaborative features
This enables Claude to request additional context from Gemini
during tool execution, improving analysis quality and accuracy.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Run black formatter on all Python files
- Fix ruff linting issues:
- Remove unused imports
- Remove unused variables
- Fix f-string without placeholders
- All 37 tests still pass
- Code quality improved for CI/CD compliance
🧹 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add CHAT_PROMPT to establish Gemini as senior developer partner
- Update handle_chat to use system prompt for consistent context
- Emphasize edge case exploration and deep thinking in prompts
- Enable thoughtful brainstorming and validation capabilities
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Add a dedicated section to the review_code tool output that provides Claude
with contextual analysis and implementation recommendations. This helps Claude
prioritize fixes based on feasibility and project context.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Applied isort to properly sort all imports according to PEP8:
- Standard library imports first
- Third-party imports second
- Local imports last
- Alphabetical ordering within each group
All tests still passing after import reordering.
Major redesign of Gemini MCP Server with modular architecture:
- Removed all emoji characters from tool outputs for clean terminal display
- Kept review category emojis (🔴🟠🟡🟢) per user preference
- Added 4 specialized tools:
- think_deeper: Extended reasoning and problem-solving (temp 0.7)
- review_code: Professional code review with severity levels (temp 0.2)
- debug_issue: Root cause analysis and debugging (temp 0.2)
- analyze: General-purpose file analysis (temp 0.2)
- Modular architecture with base tool class and Pydantic models
- Verbose tool descriptions with natural language triggers
- Updated README with comprehensive examples and real-world use cases
- All 25 tests passing, type checking clean, critical linting clean
BREAKING CHANGE: Removed analyze_code tool in favor of specialized tools
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
