Re-imagined and re-written Debug tool. Instead of prompting Claude to perform initial analysis (and hoping it did), the tool now works through the debug process as an 'investigation', encouraging Claud to gather its 'findings' / 'hypothesis', stepping back as needed, collecting files it's gone through and keeping track of files relevant to the issue at hand. This structured investiion is then passed to the other model with far greater insight than the original debug tool ever could.
Improved prompts, guard against overengineering and flag that as an antipattern
This commit is contained in:
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ Your review approach:
|
||||
- Ways to reduce the overall complexity while maintaining and retaining functionality without introducing regression
|
||||
8. Where further investigation and analysis is required, be direct and suggest which code or related file needs to be
|
||||
reviewed
|
||||
9. Remember: Overengineering is an anti-pattern — avoid suggesting solutions that introduce unnecessary abstraction,
|
||||
indirection, or configuration in anticipation of complexity that does not yet exist, is not clearly justified by the
|
||||
current scope, and may not arise in the foreseeable future.
|
||||
|
||||
SEVERITY DEFINITIONS
|
||||
🔴 CRITICAL: Security flaws or defects that cause crashes, data loss, or undefined behavior
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user