fix: address PR review feedback on test quality
- Remove broken test with unused mock parameter - Replace placeholder test with actual validation of diagnostic messages - Remove unused imports (MagicMock, patch) - Fix whitespace and formatting issues - Ensure all 6 tests pass with meaningful assertions Addresses high-priority feedback from PR review comments.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ and don't break existing functionality.
|
||||
import subprocess
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch
|
||||
|
||||
import pytest
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -78,60 +77,27 @@ class TestPipDetectionFix:
|
||||
assert python_exe.is_file(), "Python should be a file"
|
||||
assert pip_exe.is_file(), "Pip should be a file"
|
||||
|
||||
@patch("subprocess.run")
|
||||
def test_improved_pip_detection_logic(self, mock_run):
|
||||
"""Test the improved pip detection logic we plan to implement.
|
||||
def test_enhanced_diagnostic_messages_included(self):
|
||||
"""Test that our enhanced diagnostic messages are included in the script.
|
||||
|
||||
Our fix should:
|
||||
1. Use consistent Python executable paths
|
||||
2. Try multiple detection methods
|
||||
3. Provide better error diagnostics
|
||||
Verify that the script contains the enhanced error diagnostics we added.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
# Mock successful pip detection
|
||||
mock_run.return_value = MagicMock()
|
||||
mock_run.return_value.returncode = 0
|
||||
mock_run.return_value.stdout = "pip 23.0.1"
|
||||
content = Path("./run-server.sh").read_text()
|
||||
|
||||
# Test that improved detection works with various scenarios
|
||||
test_cases = [
|
||||
# (python_path, expected_success, description)
|
||||
(".zen_venv/bin/python", True, "Relative path should work"),
|
||||
("/full/path/.zen_venv/bin/python", True, "Absolute path should work"),
|
||||
("/usr/bin/python3", True, "System python should work if pip available"),
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
for python_path, expected_success, _description in test_cases:
|
||||
# This test defines what our fix should achieve
|
||||
# The actual implementation will make these pass
|
||||
subprocess.run([python_path, "-m", "pip", "--version"], capture_output=True)
|
||||
|
||||
if expected_success:
|
||||
# After our fix, all these should succeed
|
||||
pass # Will be uncommented after fix implementation
|
||||
# assert result.returncode == 0, f"Failed: {description}"
|
||||
|
||||
def test_pip_detection_error_diagnostics(self):
|
||||
"""Test that our fix provides better error diagnostics.
|
||||
|
||||
When pip detection fails, users should get helpful information
|
||||
to debug the issue instead of generic error messages.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
# This test defines what improved error messages should look like
|
||||
expected_diagnostic_info = [
|
||||
# Check that enhanced diagnostic information is present in the script
|
||||
expected_diagnostic_patterns = [
|
||||
"Enhanced diagnostic information for debugging",
|
||||
"Diagnostic information:",
|
||||
"Python executable:",
|
||||
"Python executable exists:",
|
||||
"Python executable permissions:",
|
||||
"Virtual environment path:",
|
||||
"Virtual environment exists:",
|
||||
"pip module:",
|
||||
"Final diagnostic information:",
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
# After our fix, error messages should include these diagnostic details
|
||||
# This helps users understand what went wrong
|
||||
for _info in expected_diagnostic_info:
|
||||
# Test will verify our improved error handling includes this info
|
||||
assert True # Placeholder for actual diagnostic testing
|
||||
|
||||
for pattern in expected_diagnostic_patterns:
|
||||
assert pattern in content, f"Enhanced diagnostic pattern '{pattern}' should be in script"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user