torbjorn/my-pal-mcp-server
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Improvements to consensus

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Fahad
2025-08-08 12:59:41 +05:00
parent b212cae5de
commit e29deb23db
5 changed files with 32 additions and 22 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

34
tools/consensus.py
View File

@@ -37,11 +37,12 @@ logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# Tool-specific field descriptions for consensus workflow
CONSENSUS_WORKFLOW_FIELD_DESCRIPTIONS = {
"step": (
"Describe your current consensus analysis step. In step 1, provide your own neutral, balanced analysis "
"of the proposal/idea/plan after thinking carefully about all aspects. Consider technical feasibility, "
"user value, implementation complexity, and alternatives. In subsequent steps (2+), you will receive "
"individual model responses to synthesize. CRITICAL: Be thorough and balanced in your initial assessment, "
"considering both benefits and risks, opportunities and challenges."
"In step 1: Provide the EXACT question or proposal that ALL models will evaluate. This should be phrased as a clear "
"question or problem statement, NOT as 'I will analyze...' or 'Let me examine...'. For example: 'Should we build a "
"search component in SwiftUI for use in an AppKit app?' or 'Evaluate the proposal to migrate our database from MySQL "
"to PostgreSQL'. This exact text will be sent to all models for their independent evaluation. "
"In subsequent steps (2+): This field is for internal tracking only - you can provide notes about the model response "
"you just received. This will NOT be sent to other models (they all receive the original proposal from step 1)."
),
"step_number": (
"The index of the current step in the consensus workflow, beginning at 1. Step 1 is your analysis, "
@@ -54,8 +55,11 @@ CONSENSUS_WORKFLOW_FIELD_DESCRIPTIONS = {
),
"next_step_required": ("Set to true if more models need to be consulted. False when ready for final synthesis."),
"findings": (
"In step 1, provide your comprehensive analysis of the proposal. In steps 2+, summarize the key points "
"from the model response received, noting agreements and disagreements with previous analyses."
"In step 1: Provide YOUR OWN comprehensive analysis of the proposal/question. This is where you share your "
"independent evaluation, considering technical feasibility, risks, benefits, and alternatives. This analysis "
"is NOT sent to other models - it's recorded for the final synthesis. "
"In steps 2+: Summarize the key points from the model response received, noting agreements and disagreements "
"with previous analyses."
),
"relevant_files": (
"Files that are relevant to the consensus analysis. Include files that help understand the proposal, "
@@ -161,6 +165,7 @@ class ConsensusTool(WorkflowTool):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
self.initial_prompt: str | None = None
self.original_proposal: str | None = None # Store the original proposal separately
self.models_to_consult: list[dict] = []
self.accumulated_responses: list[dict] = []
self._current_arguments: dict[str, Any] = {}
@@ -394,7 +399,7 @@ of the evidence, even when it strongly points in one direction.""",
# Prepare final synthesis data
response_data["complete_consensus"] = {
"initial_prompt": self.initial_prompt,
"initial_prompt": self.original_proposal if self.original_proposal else self.initial_prompt,
"models_consulted": [m["model"] + ":" + m.get("stance", "neutral") for m in self.accumulated_responses],
"total_responses": len(self.accumulated_responses),
"consensus_confidence": "high", # Consensus complete
@@ -445,7 +450,9 @@ of the evidence, even when it strongly points in one direction.""",
# On first step, store the models to consult
if request.step_number == 1:
self.initial_prompt = request.step
# Store the original proposal from step 1 - this is what all models should see
self.original_proposal = request.step
self.initial_prompt = request.step # Keep for backward compatibility
self.models_to_consult = request.models or []
self.accumulated_responses = []
# Set total steps: len(models) (each step includes consultation + response)
@@ -488,7 +495,7 @@ of the evidence, even when it strongly points in one direction.""",
response_data["status"] = "consensus_workflow_complete"
response_data["consensus_complete"] = True
response_data["complete_consensus"] = {
"initial_prompt": self.initial_prompt,
"initial_prompt": self.original_proposal if self.original_proposal else self.initial_prompt,
"models_consulted": [
f"{m['model']}:{m.get('stance', 'neutral')}" for m in self.accumulated_responses
],
@@ -539,7 +546,9 @@ of the evidence, even when it strongly points in one direction.""",
# Prepare the prompt with any relevant files
# Use continuation_id=None for blinded consensus - each model should only see
# original prompt + files, not conversation history or other model responses
prompt = self.initial_prompt
# CRITICAL: Use the original proposal from step 1, NOT what's in request.step for steps 2+!
# Steps 2+ contain summaries/notes that must NEVER be sent to other models
prompt = self.original_proposal if self.original_proposal else self.initial_prompt
if request.relevant_files:
file_content, _ = self._prepare_file_content_for_prompt(
request.relevant_files,
@@ -761,7 +770,8 @@ of the evidence, even when it strongly points in one direction.""",
def store_initial_issue(self, step_description: str):
"""Store initial prompt for model consultations."""
self.initial_prompt = step_description
self.original_proposal = step_description
self.initial_prompt = step_description # Keep for backward compatibility
# Required abstract methods from BaseTool
def get_request_model(self):