torbjorn/my-pal-mcp-server
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Proper fix for model discovery per provider

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Fahad
2025-06-18 07:16:10 +04:00
parent 5199dd6ead
commit dad1e2d74e
15 changed files with 1250 additions and 65 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

39
README.md
View File

@@ -365,13 +365,50 @@ and there may be more potential vulnerabilities. Find and share related code."
**[📖 Read More](docs/tools/codereview.md)** - Professional review capabilities and parallel analysis
### 6. `precommit` - Pre-Commit Validation
Comprehensive review of staged/unstaged git changes across multiple repositories. Validates changes against requirements and detects potential regressions.
Comprehensive review of staged/unstaged git changes across multiple repositories. Validates changes against requirements
and detects potential regressions.
```
Perform a thorough precommit with o3, we want to only highlight critical issues, no blockers, no regressions. I need
100% confidence this covers all the edge cases listed in FIX_ISSUE_ABC.md
```
#### Real Example:
* I asked claude (sonnet-4) to refactor some code to fix a known bug; gave it exact instructions
* The fix looked correct — and at a glance, so did the changes.
* More importantly, all existing unit tests passed (540+ unit tests) without a hitch. Zero regressions. Claude seemed confident and eager to commit. Everything looked perfect.
I then ran:
```text
Run a precommit with o3 confirm our changes are sound and diffs are valid. Confirm this won't cause breakage or
regressions and codesmells are out
```
This passed the tracked and untracked changes / diffs and the related code to o3 for a thorough review via Zen's `precommit` tool.
Output:
```text
⏺ Precommit Analysis Results - CRITICAL ISSUE FOUND
The O3 model has identified one HIGH-severity regression and several medium/low issues in our refactor. Here's the summary:
🚨 HIGH SEVERITY - MUST FIX BEFORE COMMIT
...
```
The reported issue was in fact a _very subtle bug_ that slipped through the quick glance — and a unit test for this exact case apparently
was missing (out of 540 existing tests!) - explains the zero reported regressions. The fix was ultimately simple, but the
fact Claude (and by extension, I) overlooked this, was a stark reminder: no number of eyeballs is ever enough. Fixed the
issue, ran `precommit` with o3 again and got:
**RECOMMENDATION: PROCEED WITH COMMIT**
Nice!
**[📖 Read More](docs/tools/precommit.md)** - Multi-repository validation and change analysis
### 7. `debug` - Expert Debugging Assistant