torbjorn/my-pal-mcp-server
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Generic naming to work with Gemini CLI / Claude Code

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Fahad
2025-06-27 23:41:20 +04:00
parent 75dc724ecd
commit bc447d4bcd
31 changed files with 139 additions and 139 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
tools/refactor.py
View File

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Refactor tool - Step-by-step refactoring analysis with expert validation
This tool provides a structured workflow for comprehensive code refactoring analysis.
It guides Claude through systematic investigation steps with forced pauses between each step
It guides CLI agent through systematic investigation steps with forced pauses between each step
to ensure thorough code examination, refactoring opportunity identification, and quality
assessment before proceeding. The tool supports complex refactoring scenarios including
code smell detection, decomposition planning, modernization opportunities, and organization improvements.
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ REFACTOR_FIELD_DESCRIPTIONS = {
"Indicate your current confidence in the refactoring analysis completeness. Use: 'exploring' (starting "
"analysis), 'incomplete' (just started or significant work remaining), 'partial' (some refactoring "
"opportunities identified but more analysis needed), 'complete' (comprehensive refactoring analysis "
"finished with all major opportunities identified and Claude can handle 100% confidently without help). "
"finished with all major opportunities identified and the CLI agent can handle 100% confidently without help). "
"Use 'complete' ONLY when you have fully analyzed all code, identified all significant refactoring "
"opportunities, and can provide comprehensive recommendations without expert assistance. When files are "
"too large to read fully or analysis is uncertain, use 'partial'. Using 'complete' prevents expert "
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ class RefactorTool(WorkflowTool):
"""
Decide when to call external model based on investigation completeness.
Don't call expert analysis if Claude has certain confidence and complete refactoring - trust their judgment.
Don't call expert analysis if the CLI agent has certain confidence and complete refactoring - trust their judgment.
"""
# Check if user requested to skip assistant model
if request and not self.get_request_use_assistant_model(request):
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ class RefactorTool(WorkflowTool):
# Add investigation summary
investigation_summary = self._build_refactoring_summary(consolidated_findings)
context_parts.append(
f"\\n=== CLAUDE'S REFACTORING INVESTIGATION ===\\n{investigation_summary}\\n=== END INVESTIGATION ==="
f"\\n=== AGENT'S REFACTORING INVESTIGATION ===\\n{investigation_summary}\\n=== END INVESTIGATION ==="
)
# Add refactor configuration context if available
@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ class RefactorTool(WorkflowTool):
def should_skip_expert_analysis(self, request, consolidated_findings) -> bool:
"""
Refactor workflow skips expert analysis when Claude has "complete" confidence.
Refactor workflow skips expert analysis when the CLI agent has "complete" confidence.
"""
return request.confidence == "complete" and not request.next_step_required
@@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ class RefactorTool(WorkflowTool):
def get_skip_reason(self) -> str:
"""Refactor-specific skip reason."""
return "Claude completed comprehensive refactoring analysis with full confidence"
return "Completed comprehensive refactoring analysis with full confidence locally"
def get_skip_expert_analysis_status(self) -> str:
"""Refactor-specific expert analysis skip status."""