torbjorn/my-pal-mcp-server
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Generic naming to work with Gemini CLI / Claude Code

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Fahad
2025-06-27 23:41:20 +04:00
parent 75dc724ecd
commit bc447d4bcd
31 changed files with 139 additions and 139 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
tools/analyze.py
View File

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
AnalyzeWorkflow tool - Step-by-step code analysis with systematic investigation
This tool provides a structured workflow for comprehensive code and file analysis.
It guides Claude through systematic investigation steps with forced pauses between each step
It guides the CLI agent through systematic investigation steps with forced pauses between each step
to ensure thorough code examination, pattern identification, and architectural assessment before proceeding.
The tool supports complex analysis scenarios including architectural review, performance analysis,
security assessment, and maintainability evaluation.
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ class AnalyzeTool(WorkflowTool):
# Add investigation summary
investigation_summary = self._build_analysis_summary(consolidated_findings)
context_parts.append(
f"\\n=== CLAUDE'S ANALYSIS INVESTIGATION ===\\n{investigation_summary}\\n=== END INVESTIGATION ==="
f"\\n=== AGENT'S ANALYSIS INVESTIGATION ===\\n{investigation_summary}\\n=== END INVESTIGATION ==="
)
# Add analysis configuration context if available
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ class AnalyzeTool(WorkflowTool):
def get_skip_reason(self) -> str:
"""Analyze-specific skip reason."""
return "Claude completed comprehensive analysis"
return "Completed comprehensive analysis locally"
def get_skip_expert_analysis_status(self) -> str:
"""Analyze-specific expert analysis skip status."""

2
tools/chat.py
View File

@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ class ChatTool(SimpleTool):
Format the chat response to match the original Chat tool exactly.
"""
return (
f"{response}\n\n---\n\n**Claude's Turn:** Evaluate this perspective alongside your analysis to "
f"{response}\n\n---\n\nAGENT'S TURN: Evaluate this perspective alongside your analysis to "
"form a comprehensive solution and continue with the user's request and task at hand."
)

10
tools/codereview.py
View File

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
CodeReview Workflow tool - Systematic code review with step-by-step analysis
This tool provides a structured workflow for comprehensive code review and analysis.
It guides Claude through systematic investigation steps with forced pauses between each step
It guides the CLI agent through systematic investigation steps with forced pauses between each step
to ensure thorough code examination, issue identification, and quality assessment before proceeding.
The tool supports complex review scenarios including security analysis, performance evaluation,
and architectural assessment.
@@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ class CodeReviewTool(WorkflowTool):
"""
Decide when to call external model based on investigation completeness.
Don't call expert analysis if Claude has certain confidence - trust their judgment.
Don't call expert analysis if the CLI agent has certain confidence - trust their judgment.
"""
# Check if user requested to skip assistant model
if request and not self.get_request_use_assistant_model(request):
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ class CodeReviewTool(WorkflowTool):
# Add investigation summary
investigation_summary = self._build_code_review_summary(consolidated_findings)
context_parts.append(
f"\\n=== CLAUDE'S CODE REVIEW INVESTIGATION ===\\n{investigation_summary}\\n=== END INVESTIGATION ==="
f"\\n=== AGENT'S CODE REVIEW INVESTIGATION ===\\n{investigation_summary}\\n=== END INVESTIGATION ==="
)
# Add review configuration context if available
@@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ class CodeReviewTool(WorkflowTool):
def should_skip_expert_analysis(self, request, consolidated_findings) -> bool:
"""
Code review workflow skips expert analysis when Claude has "certain" confidence.
Code review workflow skips expert analysis when the CLI agent has "certain" confidence.
"""
return request.confidence == "certain" and not request.next_step_required
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ class CodeReviewTool(WorkflowTool):
def get_skip_reason(self) -> str:
"""Code review-specific skip reason."""
return "Claude completed comprehensive code review with full confidence"
return "Completed comprehensive code review with full confidence locally"
def get_skip_expert_analysis_status(self) -> str:
"""Code review-specific expert analysis skip status."""

20
tools/consensus.py
View File

@@ -2,12 +2,12 @@
Consensus tool - Step-by-step multi-model consensus with expert analysis
This tool provides a structured workflow for gathering consensus from multiple models.
It guides Claude through systematic steps where Claude first provides its own analysis,
It guides the CLI agent through systematic steps where the CLI agent first provides its own analysis,
then consults each requested model one by one, and finally synthesizes all perspectives.
Key features:
- Step-by-step consensus workflow with progress tracking
- Claude's initial neutral analysis followed by model-specific consultations
- The CLI agent's initial neutral analysis followed by model-specific consultations
- Context-aware file embedding
- Support for stance-based analysis (for/against/neutral)
- Final synthesis combining all perspectives
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ class ConsensusTool(WorkflowTool):
"""
Consensus workflow tool for step-by-step multi-model consensus gathering.
This tool implements a structured consensus workflow where Claude first provides
This tool implements a structured consensus workflow where the CLI agent first provides
its own neutral analysis, then consults each specified model individually,
and finally synthesizes all perspectives into a unified recommendation.
"""
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ class ConsensusTool(WorkflowTool):
)
def get_system_prompt(self) -> str:
# For Claude's initial analysis, use a neutral version of the consensus prompt
# For the CLI agent's initial analysis, use a neutral version of the consensus prompt
return CONSENSUS_PROMPT.replace(
"{stance_prompt}",
"""BALANCED PERSPECTIVE
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ of the evidence, even when it strongly points in one direction.""",
Note: confidence parameter is kept for compatibility with base class but not used.
"""
if step_number == 1:
# Claude's initial analysis
# CLI Agent's initial analysis
return [
"You've provided your initial analysis. The tool will now consult other models.",
"Wait for the next step to receive the first model's response.",
@@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ of the evidence, even when it strongly points in one direction.""",
current_idx = request.current_model_index or 0
if request.step_number == 1:
# After Claude's initial analysis, prepare to consult first model
# After CLI Agent's initial analysis, prepare to consult first model
response_data["status"] = "consulting_models"
response_data["next_model"] = self.models_to_consult[0] if self.models_to_consult else None
response_data["next_steps"] = (
@@ -475,9 +475,9 @@ of the evidence, even when it strongly points in one direction.""",
"next_step_required": request.step_number < request.total_steps,
}
# Add Claude's analysis to step 1
# Add CLAI Agent's analysis to step 1
if request.step_number == 1:
response_data["claude_analysis"] = {
response_data["agent_analysis"] = {
"initial_analysis": request.step,
"findings": request.findings,
}
@@ -682,7 +682,7 @@ of the evidence, even when it strongly points in one direction.""",
"""
Customize metadata for consensus workflow to accurately reflect multi-model nature.
The default workflow metadata shows the model running Claude's analysis steps,
The default workflow metadata shows the model running Agent's analysis steps,
but consensus is a multi-model tool that consults different models. We need
to provide accurate metadata that reflects this.
"""
@@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ of the evidence, even when it strongly points in one direction.""",
}
)
# Remove the misleading single model metadata that shows Claude's execution model
# Remove the misleading single model metadata that shows Agent's execution model
# instead of the models being consulted
metadata.pop("model_used", None)
metadata.pop("provider_used", None)

8
tools/debug.py
View File

@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ class DebugIssueTool(WorkflowTool):
"""
Decide when to call external model based on investigation completeness.
Don't call expert analysis if Claude has certain confidence - trust their judgment.
Don't call expert analysis if the CLI agent has certain confidence - trust their judgment.
"""
# Check if user requested to skip assistant model
if request and not self.get_request_use_assistant_model(request):
@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ class DebugIssueTool(WorkflowTool):
# Add investigation summary
investigation_summary = self._build_investigation_summary(consolidated_findings)
context_parts.append(
f"\n=== CLAUDE'S INVESTIGATION FINDINGS ===\n{investigation_summary}\n=== END FINDINGS ==="
f"\n=== AGENT'S INVESTIGATION FINDINGS ===\n{investigation_summary}\n=== END FINDINGS ==="
)
# Add error context if available
@@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ class DebugIssueTool(WorkflowTool):
def should_skip_expert_analysis(self, request, consolidated_findings) -> bool:
"""
Debug tool skips expert analysis when Claude has "certain" confidence.
Debug tool skips expert analysis when agent has "certain" confidence.
"""
return request.confidence == "certain" and not request.next_step_required
@@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ class DebugIssueTool(WorkflowTool):
def get_skip_reason(self) -> str:
"""Debug-specific skip reason."""
return "Claude identified exact root cause with minimal fix requirement"
return "Identified exact root cause with minimal fix requirement locally"
def get_request_relevant_context(self, request) -> list:
"""Get relevant_context for debug tool."""

6
tools/docgen.py
View File

@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ class DocgenTool(WorkflowTool):
"""
Docgen tool doesn't require model resolution at the MCP boundary.
The docgen tool is a self-contained workflow tool that guides Claude through
The docgen tool is a self-contained workflow tool that guides the CLI agent through
systematic documentation generation without calling external AI models.
Returns:
@@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ class DocgenTool(WorkflowTool):
def should_skip_expert_analysis(self, request, consolidated_findings) -> bool:
"""
Docgen tool skips expert analysis when Claude has "certain" confidence.
Docgen tool skips expert analysis when the CLI agent has "certain" confidence.
"""
return request.confidence == "certain" and not request.next_step_required
@@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ class DocgenTool(WorkflowTool):
def get_skip_reason(self) -> str:
"""Docgen-specific skip reason."""
return "Claude completed comprehensive documentation analysis"
return "Completed comprehensive documentation analysis locally"
def get_request_relevant_context(self, request) -> list:
"""Get relevant_context for docgen tool."""

4
tools/listmodels.py
View File

@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ class ListModelsTool(BaseTool):
output_lines.append(f"**Error loading models**: {str(e)}")
else:
output_lines.append("**Status**: Not configured (set OPENROUTER_API_KEY)")
output_lines.append("**Note**: Provides access to GPT-4, Claude, Mistral, and many more")
output_lines.append("**Note**: Provides access to GPT-4, O3, Mistral, and many more")
output_lines.append("")
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ class ListModelsTool(BaseTool):
# Add usage tips
output_lines.append("\n**Usage Tips**:")
output_lines.append("- Use model aliases (e.g., 'flash', 'o3', 'opus') for convenience")
output_lines.append("- In auto mode, Claude will select the best model for each task")
output_lines.append("- In auto mode, the CLI Agent will select the best model for each task")
output_lines.append("- Custom models are only available when CUSTOM_API_URL is set")
output_lines.append("- OpenRouter provides access to many cloud models with one API key")

16
tools/models.py
View File

@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ class ToolModelCategory(Enum):
class ContinuationOffer(BaseModel):
"""Offer for Claude to continue conversation when Gemini doesn't ask follow-up"""
"""Offer for CLI agent to continue conversation when Gemini doesn't ask follow-up"""
continuation_id: str = Field(
..., description="Thread continuation ID for multi-turn conversations across different tools"
)
note: str = Field(..., description="Message explaining continuation opportunity to Claude")
note: str = Field(..., description="Message explaining continuation opportunity to CLI agent")
remaining_turns: int = Field(..., description="Number of conversation turns remaining")
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ class ToolOutput(BaseModel):
content_type: Literal["text", "markdown", "json"] = "text"
metadata: Optional[dict[str, Any]] = Field(default_factory=dict)
continuation_offer: Optional[ContinuationOffer] = Field(
None, description="Optional offer for Claude to continue conversation"
None, description="Optional offer for Agent to continue conversation"
)
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ class FilesNeededRequest(BaseModel):
"""Request for missing files / code to continue"""
status: Literal["files_required_to_continue"] = "files_required_to_continue"
mandatory_instructions: str = Field(..., description="Critical instructions for Claude regarding required context")
mandatory_instructions: str = Field(..., description="Critical instructions for Agent regarding required context")
files_needed: Optional[list[str]] = Field(
default_factory=list, description="Specific files that are needed for analysis"
)
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ class FullCodereviewRequired(BaseModel):
class FocusedReviewRequired(BaseModel):
"""Request for Claude to provide smaller, focused subsets of code for review"""
"""Request for Agent to provide smaller, focused subsets of code for review"""
status: Literal["focused_review_required"] = "focused_review_required"
reason: str = Field(..., description="Why the current scope is too large for effective review")
@@ -122,14 +122,14 @@ class RefactorOpportunity(BaseModel):
class RefactorAction(BaseModel):
"""Next action for Claude to implement refactoring"""
"""Next action for Agent to implement refactoring"""
action_type: Literal["EXTRACT_METHOD", "SPLIT_CLASS", "MODERNIZE_SYNTAX", "REORGANIZE_CODE", "DECOMPOSE_FILE"] = (
Field(..., description="Type of action to perform")
)
target_file: str = Field(..., description="Absolute path to target file")
source_lines: str = Field(..., description="Line range (e.g., '45-67')")
description: str = Field(..., description="Step-by-step action description for Claude")
description: str = Field(..., description="Step-by-step action description for CLI Agent")
class RefactorAnalysisComplete(BaseModel):
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ class RefactorAnalysisComplete(BaseModel):
status: Literal["refactor_analysis_complete"] = "refactor_analysis_complete"
refactor_opportunities: list[RefactorOpportunity] = Field(..., description="List of refactoring opportunities")
priority_sequence: list[str] = Field(..., description="Recommended order of refactoring IDs")
next_actions_for_claude: list[RefactorAction] = Field(..., description="Specific actions for Claude to implement")
next_actions: list[RefactorAction] = Field(..., description="Specific actions for the agent to implement")
class CodeTooLargeRequest(BaseModel):

10
tools/precommit.py
View File

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Precommit Workflow tool - Step-by-step pre-commit validation with expert analysis
This tool provides a structured workflow for comprehensive pre-commit validation.
It guides Claude through systematic investigation steps with forced pauses between each step
It guides the CLI agent through systematic investigation steps with forced pauses between each step
to ensure thorough code examination, git change analysis, and issue detection before proceeding.
The tool supports backtracking, finding updates, and expert analysis integration.
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ class PrecommitTool(WorkflowTool):
"""
Decide when to call external model based on investigation completeness.
Don't call expert analysis if Claude has certain confidence - trust their judgment.
Don't call expert analysis if the CLI agent has certain confidence - trust their judgment.
"""
# Check if user requested to skip assistant model
if request and not self.get_request_use_assistant_model(request):
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ class PrecommitTool(WorkflowTool):
# Add investigation summary
investigation_summary = self._build_precommit_summary(consolidated_findings)
context_parts.append(
f"\\n=== CLAUDE'S PRE-COMMIT INVESTIGATION ===\\n{investigation_summary}\\n=== END INVESTIGATION ==="
f"\\n=== AGENT'S PRE-COMMIT INVESTIGATION ===\\n{investigation_summary}\\n=== END INVESTIGATION ==="
)
# Add git configuration context if available
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ class PrecommitTool(WorkflowTool):
def should_skip_expert_analysis(self, request, consolidated_findings) -> bool:
"""
Precommit workflow skips expert analysis when Claude has "certain" confidence.
Precommit workflow skips expert analysis when the CLI agent has "certain" confidence.
"""
return request.confidence == "certain" and not request.next_step_required
@@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ class PrecommitTool(WorkflowTool):
def get_skip_reason(self) -> str:
"""Precommit-specific skip reason."""
return "Claude completed comprehensive pre-commit validation with full confidence"
return "Completed comprehensive pre-commit validation with full confidence locally"
def get_skip_expert_analysis_status(self) -> str:
"""Precommit-specific expert analysis skip status."""

12
tools/refactor.py
View File

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Refactor tool - Step-by-step refactoring analysis with expert validation
This tool provides a structured workflow for comprehensive code refactoring analysis.
It guides Claude through systematic investigation steps with forced pauses between each step
It guides CLI agent through systematic investigation steps with forced pauses between each step
to ensure thorough code examination, refactoring opportunity identification, and quality
assessment before proceeding. The tool supports complex refactoring scenarios including
code smell detection, decomposition planning, modernization opportunities, and organization improvements.
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ REFACTOR_FIELD_DESCRIPTIONS = {
"Indicate your current confidence in the refactoring analysis completeness. Use: 'exploring' (starting "
"analysis), 'incomplete' (just started or significant work remaining), 'partial' (some refactoring "
"opportunities identified but more analysis needed), 'complete' (comprehensive refactoring analysis "
"finished with all major opportunities identified and Claude can handle 100% confidently without help). "
"finished with all major opportunities identified and the CLI agent can handle 100% confidently without help). "
"Use 'complete' ONLY when you have fully analyzed all code, identified all significant refactoring "
"opportunities, and can provide comprehensive recommendations without expert assistance. When files are "
"too large to read fully or analysis is uncertain, use 'partial'. Using 'complete' prevents expert "
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ class RefactorTool(WorkflowTool):
"""
Decide when to call external model based on investigation completeness.
Don't call expert analysis if Claude has certain confidence and complete refactoring - trust their judgment.
Don't call expert analysis if the CLI agent has certain confidence and complete refactoring - trust their judgment.
"""
# Check if user requested to skip assistant model
if request and not self.get_request_use_assistant_model(request):
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ class RefactorTool(WorkflowTool):
# Add investigation summary
investigation_summary = self._build_refactoring_summary(consolidated_findings)
context_parts.append(
f"\\n=== CLAUDE'S REFACTORING INVESTIGATION ===\\n{investigation_summary}\\n=== END INVESTIGATION ==="
f"\\n=== AGENT'S REFACTORING INVESTIGATION ===\\n{investigation_summary}\\n=== END INVESTIGATION ==="
)
# Add refactor configuration context if available
@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ class RefactorTool(WorkflowTool):
def should_skip_expert_analysis(self, request, consolidated_findings) -> bool:
"""
Refactor workflow skips expert analysis when Claude has "complete" confidence.
Refactor workflow skips expert analysis when the CLI agent has "complete" confidence.
"""
return request.confidence == "complete" and not request.next_step_required
@@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ class RefactorTool(WorkflowTool):
def get_skip_reason(self) -> str:
"""Refactor-specific skip reason."""
return "Claude completed comprehensive refactoring analysis with full confidence"
return "Completed comprehensive refactoring analysis with full confidence locally"
def get_skip_expert_analysis_status(self) -> str:
"""Refactor-specific expert analysis skip status."""

8
tools/secaudit.py
View File

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
SECAUDIT Workflow tool - Comprehensive security audit with systematic investigation
This tool provides a structured workflow for comprehensive security assessment and analysis.
It guides Claude through systematic investigation steps with forced pauses between each step
It guides the CLI agent through systematic investigation steps with forced pauses between each step
to ensure thorough security examination, vulnerability identification, and compliance assessment
before proceeding. The tool supports complex security scenarios including OWASP Top 10 coverage,
compliance framework mapping, and technology-specific security patterns.
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ class SecauditTool(WorkflowTool):
# Add investigation summary
investigation_summary = self._build_security_audit_summary(consolidated_findings)
context_parts.append(
f"\n=== CLAUDE'S SECURITY INVESTIGATION ===\n{investigation_summary}\n=== END INVESTIGATION ==="
f"\n=== AGENT'S SECURITY INVESTIGATION ===\n{investigation_summary}\n=== END INVESTIGATION ==="
)
# Add security configuration context if available
@@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ class SecauditTool(WorkflowTool):
return step_data
def should_skip_expert_analysis(self, request, consolidated_findings) -> bool:
"""Security audit workflow skips expert analysis when Claude has "certain" confidence."""
"""Security audit workflow skips expert analysis when the CLI agent has "certain" confidence."""
return request.confidence == "certain" and not request.next_step_required
def store_initial_issue(self, step_description: str):
@@ -762,7 +762,7 @@ class SecauditTool(WorkflowTool):
def get_skip_reason(self) -> str:
"""Security audit-specific skip reason."""
return "Claude completed comprehensive security audit with full confidence"
return "Completed comprehensive security audit with full confidence locally"
def get_skip_expert_analysis_status(self) -> str:
"""Security audit-specific expert analysis skip status."""

8
tools/testgen.py
View File

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
TestGen Workflow tool - Step-by-step test generation with expert validation
This tool provides a structured workflow for comprehensive test generation.
It guides Claude through systematic investigation steps with forced pauses between each step
It guides the CLI agent through systematic investigation steps with forced pauses between each step
to ensure thorough code examination, test planning, and pattern identification before proceeding.
The tool supports backtracking, finding updates, and expert analysis integration for
comprehensive test suite generation.
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ class TestGenTool(WorkflowTool):
# Add investigation summary
investigation_summary = self._build_test_generation_summary(consolidated_findings)
context_parts.append(
f"\n=== CLAUDE'S TEST PLANNING INVESTIGATION ===\n{investigation_summary}\n=== END INVESTIGATION ==="
f"\n=== AGENT'S TEST PLANNING INVESTIGATION ===\n{investigation_summary}\n=== END INVESTIGATION ==="
)
# Add relevant code elements if available
@@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ class TestGenTool(WorkflowTool):
def should_skip_expert_analysis(self, request, consolidated_findings) -> bool:
"""
Test generation workflow skips expert analysis when Claude has "certain" confidence.
Test generation workflow skips expert analysis when the CLI agent has "certain" confidence.
"""
return request.confidence == "certain" and not request.next_step_required
@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ class TestGenTool(WorkflowTool):
def get_skip_reason(self) -> str:
"""Test generation-specific skip reason."""
return "Claude completed comprehensive test planning with full confidence"
return "Completed comprehensive test planning with full confidence locally"
def get_skip_expert_analysis_status(self) -> str:
"""Test generation-specific expert analysis skip status."""

4
tools/thinkdeep.py
View File

@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ class ThinkDeepTool(WorkflowTool):
def should_skip_expert_analysis(self, request, consolidated_findings) -> bool:
"""
ThinkDeep tool skips expert analysis when Claude has "certain" confidence.
ThinkDeep tool skips expert analysis when the CLI agent has "certain" confidence.
"""
return request.confidence == "certain" and not request.next_step_required
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ class ThinkDeepTool(WorkflowTool):
def get_skip_reason(self) -> str:
"""Reason for skipping expert analysis."""
return "Claude expressed certain confidence in the deep thinking analysis - no additional validation needed"
return "Expressed 'certain' confidence in the deep thinking analysis - no additional validation needed"
def get_completion_message(self) -> str:
"""Message for completion without expert analysis."""

4
tools/tracer.py
View File

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Tracer Workflow tool - Step-by-step code tracing and dependency analysis
This tool provides a structured workflow for comprehensive code tracing and analysis.
It guides Claude through systematic investigation steps with forced pauses between each step
It guides the CLI agent through systematic investigation steps with forced pauses between each step
to ensure thorough code examination, dependency mapping, and execution flow analysis before proceeding.
The tracer guides users through sequential code analysis with full context awareness and
@@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ class TracerTool(WorkflowTool):
def _get_rendering_instructions(self, trace_mode: str) -> str:
"""
Get mode-specific rendering instructions for Claude.
Get mode-specific rendering instructions for the CLI agent.
Args:
trace_mode: Either "precision" or "dependencies"

2
tools/version.py
View File

@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ class VersionTool(BaseTool):
output_lines.append("git pull")
output_lines.append("```")
output_lines.append("")
output_lines.append("*Note: Restart your Claude session after updating to use the new version.*")
output_lines.append("*Note: Restart your session after updating to use the new version.*")
elif comparison == 0:
# Up to date
output_lines.append("")