Generic naming to work with Gemini CLI / Claude Code
This commit is contained in:
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ performance, maintainability, and architecture. Your task is to review the code
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL LINE NUMBER INSTRUCTIONS
|
||||
Code is presented with line number markers "LINE│ code". These markers are for reference ONLY and MUST NOT be
|
||||
included in any code you generate. Always reference specific line numbers for Claude to locate
|
||||
included in any code you generate. Always reference specific line numbers in your replies in order to locate
|
||||
exact positions if needed to point to exact locations. Include a very short code excerpt alongside for clarity.
|
||||
Include context_start_text and context_end_text as backup references. Never include "LINE│" markers in generated code
|
||||
snippets.
|
||||
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ a complete and accurate review, you MUST respond ONLY with this JSON format (and
|
||||
same file you've been provided unless for some reason its content is missing or incomplete:
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "files_required_to_continue",
|
||||
"mandatory_instructions": "<your critical instructions for Claude>",
|
||||
"mandatory_instructions": "<your critical instructions for the agent>",
|
||||
"files_needed": ["[file name here]", "[or some folder/]"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ After listing issues, add:
|
||||
• **Positive aspects** worth retaining
|
||||
|
||||
IF SCOPE TOO LARGE FOR FOCUSED REVIEW
|
||||
If the codebase is too large or complex to review effectively in a single response, you MUST request Claude to
|
||||
If the codebase is too large or complex to review effectively in a single response, you MUST request the agent to
|
||||
provide smaller, more focused subsets for review. Respond ONLY with this JSON format (and nothing else):
|
||||
{"status": "focused_review_required",
|
||||
"reason": "<brief explanation of why the scope is too large>",
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user