refactor: rename think_deeper to thinkdeep for brevity

- Renamed `think_deeper` tool to `thinkdeep` for shorter, cleaner naming
- Updated all imports from ThinkDeeperTool to ThinkDeepTool
- Updated all references from THINK_DEEPER_PROMPT to THINKDEEP_PROMPT
- Updated tool registration in server.py
- Updated all test files to use new naming convention
- Updated README documentation to reflect new tool names
- All functionality remains the same, only naming has changed

This completes the tool renaming refactor for improved clarity and consistency.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

README.md

@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ Replace `/path/to/gemini-mcp-server` with the actual path where you cloned the r
 ### 6. Start Using It!
 
 Just ask Claude naturally:
-- "Use gemini to think deeper about this architecture design" → `think_deeper`
+- "Use gemini to think deeper about this architecture design" → `thinkdeep`
 - "Get gemini to review this code for security issues" → `review_code`
 - "Get gemini to debug why this test is failing" → `debug`
 - "Use gemini to analyze these files to understand the data flow" → `analyze`
@@ -335,9 +335,9 @@ Just ask Claude naturally:
 
 **Quick Tool Selection Guide:**
 - **Need a thinking partner?** → `chat` (brainstorm ideas, get second opinions, validate approaches)
-- **Need deeper thinking?** → `think_deeper` (extends Claude's analysis, finds edge cases)
+- **Need deeper thinking?** → `thinkdeep` (extends Claude's analysis, finds edge cases)
-- **Code needs review?** → `review_code` (bugs, security, performance issues)
+- **Code needs review?** → `codereview` (bugs, security, performance issues)
-- **Pre-commit validation?** → `review_changes` (validate git changes before committing)
+- **Pre-commit validation?** → `precommit` (validate git changes before committing)
 - **Something's broken?** → `debug` (root cause analysis, error tracing)
 - **Want to understand code?** → `analyze` (architecture, patterns, dependencies)
 - **Server info?** → `get_version` (version and configuration details)

prompts/__init__.py

@@ -7,11 +7,11 @@ from .tool_prompts import (
     CHAT_PROMPT,
     CODEREVIEW_PROMPT,
     DEBUG_ISSUE_PROMPT,
-    THINK_DEEPER_PROMPT,
+    THINKDEEP_PROMPT,
 )
 
 __all__ = [
-    "THINK_DEEPER_PROMPT",
+    "THINKDEEP_PROMPT",
     "CODEREVIEW_PROMPT",
     "DEBUG_ISSUE_PROMPT",
     "ANALYZE_PROMPT",

prompts/tool_prompts.py

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 System prompts for each tool
 """
 
-THINK_DEEPER_PROMPT = """You are a senior development partner collaborating with Claude Code on complex problems.
+THINKDEEP_PROMPT = """You are a senior development partner collaborating with Claude Code on complex problems.
 Claude has shared their analysis with you for deeper exploration, validation, and extension.
 
 IMPORTANT: If you need additional context (e.g., related files, system architecture, requirements)

server.py

@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ from tools import (
     CodeReviewTool,
     DebugIssueTool,
     Precommit,
-    ThinkDeeperTool,
+    ThinkDeepTool,
 )
 
 # Configure logging for server operations
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ server: Server = Server("gemini-server")
 # Each tool provides specialized functionality for different development tasks
 # Tools are instantiated once and reused across requests (stateless design)
 TOOLS = {
-    "think_deeper": ThinkDeeperTool(),  # Extended reasoning for complex problems
+    "thinkdeep": ThinkDeepTool(),  # Extended reasoning for complex problems
     "codereview": CodeReviewTool(),  # Comprehensive code review and quality analysis
     "debug": DebugIssueTool(),  # Root cause analysis and debugging assistance
     "analyze": AnalyzeTool(),  # General-purpose file and code analysis

tests/test_large_prompt_handling.py

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ from tools.chat import ChatTool
 from tools.codereview import CodeReviewTool
 from tools.debug import DebugIssueTool
 from tools.precommit import Precommit
-from tools.think_deeper import ThinkDeeperTool
+from tools.thinkdeep import ThinkDeepTool
 
 
 class TestLargePromptHandling:
@@ -131,9 +131,9 @@ class TestLargePromptHandling:
         shutil.rmtree(temp_dir)
 
     @pytest.mark.asyncio
-    async def test_think_deeper_large_analysis(self, large_prompt):
+    async def test_thinkdeep_large_analysis(self, large_prompt):
-        """Test that think_deeper tool detects large current_analysis."""
+        """Test that thinkdeep tool detects large current_analysis."""
-        tool = ThinkDeeperTool()
+        tool = ThinkDeepTool()
         result = await tool.execute({"current_analysis": large_prompt})
 
         assert len(result) == 1

tests/test_live_integration.py

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ sys.path.insert(0, os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))))
 import json
 
 from tools.analyze import AnalyzeTool
-from tools.think_deeper import ThinkDeeperTool
+from tools.thinkdeep import ThinkDeepTool
 
 
 async def run_manual_live_tests():
@@ -60,8 +60,8 @@ async def run_manual_live_tests():
                 print("❌ AnalyzeTool live test failed")
                 return False
 
-            # Test ThinkDeeperTool
+            # Test ThinkDeepTool
-            think_tool = ThinkDeeperTool()
+            think_tool = ThinkDeepTool()
             result = await think_tool.execute(
                 {
                     "current_analysis": "Testing live integration",
@@ -70,9 +70,9 @@ async def run_manual_live_tests():
             )
 
             if result and result[0].text and "Extended Analysis" in result[0].text:
-                print("✅ ThinkDeeperTool live test successful")
+                print("✅ ThinkDeepTool live test successful")
             else:
-                print("❌ ThinkDeeperTool live test failed")
+                print("❌ ThinkDeepTool live test failed")
                 return False
 
             # Test collaboration/clarification request

tests/test_prompt_regression.py

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ from tools.chat import ChatTool
 from tools.codereview import CodeReviewTool
 from tools.debug import DebugIssueTool
 from tools.precommit import Precommit
-from tools.think_deeper import ThinkDeeperTool
+from tools.thinkdeep import ThinkDeepTool
 
 
 class TestPromptRegression:
@@ -79,9 +79,9 @@ class TestPromptRegression:
                 mock_read_files.assert_called_once_with(["/path/to/file.py"])
 
     @pytest.mark.asyncio
-    async def test_think_deeper_normal_analysis(self, mock_model_response):
+    async def test_thinkdeep_normal_analysis(self, mock_model_response):
-        """Test think_deeper tool with normal analysis."""
+        """Test thinkdeep tool with normal analysis."""
-        tool = ThinkDeeperTool()
+        tool = ThinkDeepTool()
 
         with patch.object(tool, "create_model") as mock_create_model:
             mock_model = MagicMock()

tests/test_server.py

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ class TestServerTools:
         tool_names = [tool.name for tool in tools]
 
         # Check all core tools are present
-        assert "think_deeper" in tool_names
+        assert "thinkdeep" in tool_names
         assert "codereview" in tool_names
         assert "debug" in tool_names
         assert "analyze" in tool_names
@@ -77,4 +77,4 @@ class TestServerTools:
         response = result[0].text
         assert "Gemini MCP Server v" in response  # Version agnostic check
         assert "Available Tools:" in response
-        assert "think_deeper" in response
+        assert "thinkdeep" in response

tests/test_thinking_modes.py

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ import pytest
 from tools.analyze import AnalyzeTool
 from tools.codereview import CodeReviewTool
 from tools.debug import DebugIssueTool
-from tools.think_deeper import ThinkDeeperTool
+from tools.thinkdeep import ThinkDeepTool
 
 
 @pytest.fixture(autouse=True)
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ class TestThinkingModes:
     def test_default_thinking_modes(self):
         """Test that tools have correct default thinking modes"""
         tools = [
-            (ThinkDeeperTool(), "high"),
+            (ThinkDeepTool(), "high"),
             (AnalyzeTool(), "medium"),
             (CodeReviewTool(), "medium"),
             (DebugIssueTool(), "medium"),
@@ -145,14 +145,14 @@ class TestThinkingModes:
     @pytest.mark.asyncio
     @patch("tools.base.BaseTool.create_model")
     async def test_thinking_mode_max(self, mock_create_model):
-        """Test max thinking mode (default for think_deeper)"""
+        """Test max thinking mode (default for thinkdeep)"""
         mock_model = Mock()
         mock_model.generate_content.return_value = Mock(
             candidates=[Mock(content=Mock(parts=[Mock(text="Max thinking response")]))]
         )
         mock_create_model.return_value = mock_model
 
-        tool = ThinkDeeperTool()
+        tool = ThinkDeepTool()
         result = await tool.execute(
             {
                 "current_analysis": "Initial analysis",

tests/test_tools.py

@@ -7,19 +7,19 @@ from unittest.mock import Mock, patch
 
 import pytest
 
-from tools import AnalyzeTool, ChatTool, CodeReviewTool, DebugIssueTool, ThinkDeeperTool
+from tools import AnalyzeTool, ChatTool, CodeReviewTool, DebugIssueTool, ThinkDeepTool
 
 
-class TestThinkDeeperTool:
+class TestThinkDeepTool:
-    """Test the think_deeper tool"""
+    """Test the thinkdeep tool"""
 
     @pytest.fixture
     def tool(self):
-        return ThinkDeeperTool()
+        return ThinkDeepTool()
 
     def test_tool_metadata(self, tool):
         """Test tool metadata"""
-        assert tool.get_name() == "think_deeper"
+        assert tool.get_name() == "thinkdeep"
         assert "EXTENDED THINKING" in tool.get_description()
         assert tool.get_default_temperature() == 0.7
 
@@ -249,9 +249,9 @@ class TestAbsolutePathValidation:
         assert "src/main.py" in response["content"]
 
     @pytest.mark.asyncio
-    async def test_think_deeper_tool_relative_path_rejected(self):
+    async def test_thinkdeep_tool_relative_path_rejected(self):
-        """Test that think_deeper tool rejects relative paths"""
+        """Test that thinkdeep tool rejects relative paths"""
-        tool = ThinkDeeperTool()
+        tool = ThinkDeepTool()
         result = await tool.execute({"current_analysis": "My analysis", "files": ["./local/file.py"]})
 
         assert len(result) == 1

tools/__init__.py

@@ -7,10 +7,10 @@ from .chat import ChatTool
 from .codereview import CodeReviewTool
 from .debug import DebugIssueTool
 from .precommit import Precommit
-from .think_deeper import ThinkDeeperTool
+from .thinkdeep import ThinkDeepTool
 
 __all__ = [
-    "ThinkDeeperTool",
+    "ThinkDeepTool",
     "CodeReviewTool",
     "DebugIssueTool",
     "AnalyzeTool",

tools/thinkdeep.py

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 """
-Think Deeper tool - Extended reasoning and problem-solving
+ThinkDeep tool - Extended reasoning and problem-solving
 """
 
 from typing import Any, Optional
@@ -8,15 +8,15 @@ from mcp.types import TextContent
 from pydantic import Field
 
 from config import TEMPERATURE_CREATIVE
-from prompts import THINK_DEEPER_PROMPT
+from prompts import THINKDEEP_PROMPT
 from utils import read_files
 
 from .base import BaseTool, ToolRequest
 from .models import ToolOutput
 
 
-class ThinkDeeperRequest(ToolRequest):
+class ThinkDeepRequest(ToolRequest):
-    """Request model for think_deeper tool"""
+    """Request model for thinkdeep tool"""
 
     current_analysis: str = Field(..., description="Claude's current thinking/analysis to extend")
     problem_context: Optional[str] = Field(None, description="Additional context about the problem or goal")
@@ -30,11 +30,11 @@ class ThinkDeeperRequest(ToolRequest):
     )
 
 
-class ThinkDeeperTool(BaseTool):
+class ThinkDeepTool(BaseTool):
     """Extended thinking and reasoning tool"""
 
     def get_name(self) -> str:
-        return "think_deeper"
+        return "thinkdeep"
 
     def get_description(self) -> str:
         return (
@@ -92,17 +92,17 @@ class ThinkDeeperTool(BaseTool):
         }
 
     def get_system_prompt(self) -> str:
-        return THINK_DEEPER_PROMPT
+        return THINKDEEP_PROMPT
 
     def get_default_temperature(self) -> float:
         return TEMPERATURE_CREATIVE
 
     def get_default_thinking_mode(self) -> str:
-        """ThinkDeeper uses high thinking by default"""
+        """ThinkDeep uses high thinking by default"""
         return "high"
 
     def get_request_model(self):
-        return ThinkDeeperRequest
+        return ThinkDeepRequest
 
     async def execute(self, arguments: dict[str, Any]) -> list[TextContent]:
         """Override execute to check current_analysis size before processing"""
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ class ThinkDeeperTool(BaseTool):
         # Continue with normal execution
         return await super().execute(arguments)
 
-    async def prepare_prompt(self, request: ThinkDeeperRequest) -> str:
+    async def prepare_prompt(self, request: ThinkDeepRequest) -> str:
         """Prepare the full prompt for extended thinking"""
         # Check for prompt.txt in files
         prompt_content, updated_files = self.handle_prompt_file(request.files)
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ Please provide deep analysis that extends Claude's thinking with:
 
         return full_prompt
 
-    def format_response(self, response: str, request: ThinkDeeperRequest) -> str:
+    def format_response(self, response: str, request: ThinkDeepRequest) -> str:
         """Format the response with clear attribution and critical thinking prompt"""
         return f"""## Extended Analysis by Gemini