torbjorn/my-pal-mcp-server
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix: rebranding, see [docs/name-change.md](docs/name-change.md) for details

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Fahad
2025-12-04 18:11:55 +04:00
parent bcfaccecd4
commit b2dc84992d
122 changed files with 1423 additions and 1056 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
docs/tools/precommit.md
View File

@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ After Claude completes the investigation (unless precommit_type is **internal**)
- Default validation type is **external** (uses expert model for additional review)
- To skip expert validation, explicitly request "don't use any other model" or set precommit_type to "internal"
- **CRITICAL**: Minimum 3 steps are enforced - tool will prevent setting `next_step_required=false` before final step
- **MANDATORY**: Changeset file (zen_precommit.changeset) must be created for external validation
- **MANDATORY**: Changeset file (pal_precommit.changeset) must be created for external validation
## Model Recommendation
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ passing, it went ahead with an initial review with O3; came back clean - all goo
Then it shared the changes and relevant code with Gemini 3.0 Pro - the following is the outcome:
```
⏺ zen:precommit (MCP)(step: "FINAL VALIDATION COMPLETE. All changes have been thoroughly analyzed and are ready for
⏺ pal:precommit (MCP)(step: "FINAL VALIDATION COMPLETE. All changes have been thoroughly analyzed and are ready for
commit. The modifications successfully fix 4 GitHub CI test failures with high-quality, defensive
implementations that maintain architectural integrity and coding standards. No issues or regressions
detected.", step_number: 4, total_steps: 4, next_step_required: false, findings: "COMMIT
@@ -101,12 +101,12 @@ Then it shared the changes and relevant code with Gemini 3.0 Pro - the following
- Fix Required: Apply the same defensive pattern to the missed location
```
A subtle but critical issue spotted by Gemini that both Claude + O3 missed. This is the power of running these workflows with Zen.
A subtle but critical issue spotted by Gemini that both Claude + O3 missed. This is the power of running these workflows with PAL.
## Example Prompts
```
Use zen and perform a thorough precommit ensuring there aren't any new regressions or bugs introduced
Use pal and perform a thorough precommit ensuring there aren't any new regressions or bugs introduced
```
## Key Features
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ Use zen and perform a thorough precommit ensuring there aren't any new regressio
**Basic Pre-commit Validation:**
```
"Use zen precommit to validate my changes before committing"
"Use pal precommit to validate my changes before committing"
```
**Security-Focused Validation:**