From a1451befd2a3d77e1345661c076be50548ee5d70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josh Vera Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2025 19:24:51 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] refactor: Clean up test files and simplify documentation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit - Remove unused cassette files with incomplete recordings - Delete broken respx test files (test_o3_pro_respx_simple.py, test_o3_pro_http_recording.py) - Fix respx references in docstrings to mention HTTP transport recorder - Simplify vcr-testing.md documentation (60% reduction, more task-oriented) - Add simplified PR template with better test instructions - Fix cassette path consistency in examples - Add security note about reviewing cassettes before committing 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude --- docs/vcr-testing.md | 233 ++++-------------- pr_template_filled.md | 99 ++++++++ pr_template_filled_simplified.md | 59 +++++ tests/openai_cassettes/o3_pro_quick_test.json | 172 ------------- .../o3_pro_simple_enhanced.json | 88 ------- tests/test_o3_pro_http_recording.py | 104 -------- tests/test_o3_pro_output_text_fix.py | 4 +- tests/test_o3_pro_respx_simple.py | 104 -------- 8 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 651 deletions(-) create mode 100644 pr_template_filled.md create mode 100644 pr_template_filled_simplified.md delete mode 100644 tests/openai_cassettes/o3_pro_quick_test.json delete mode 100644 tests/openai_cassettes/o3_pro_simple_enhanced.json delete mode 100644 tests/test_o3_pro_http_recording.py delete mode 100644 tests/test_o3_pro_respx_simple.py diff --git a/docs/vcr-testing.md b/docs/vcr-testing.md index 87832b6..005fdd4 100644 --- a/docs/vcr-testing.md +++ b/docs/vcr-testing.md @@ -1,216 +1,87 @@ -# HTTP Recording/Replay Testing with HTTP Transport Recorder +# HTTP Transport Recorder for Testing -This project uses a custom HTTP Transport Recorder for testing expensive API integrations (like o3-pro) with real recorded responses. +A custom HTTP recorder for testing expensive API calls (like o3-pro) with real responses. -## What is HTTP Transport Recorder? +## Overview -The HTTP Transport Recorder is a custom httpx transport implementation that intercepts HTTP requests/responses at the transport layer. This approach provides: +The HTTP Transport Recorder captures and replays HTTP interactions at the transport layer, enabling: +- Cost-efficient testing of expensive APIs (record once, replay forever) +- Deterministic tests with real API responses +- Seamless integration with httpx and OpenAI SDK -- **Real API structure**: Tests use actual API responses, not guessed mocks -- **Cost efficiency**: Only pay for API calls once during recording -- **Deterministic tests**: Same response every time, no API variability -- **Transport-level interception**: Works seamlessly with httpx and OpenAI SDK -- **Full response capture**: Captures complete HTTP responses including headers and gzipped content - -## Directory Structure - -``` -tests/ -├── openai_cassettes/ # Recorded HTTP interactions -│ ├── o3_pro_basic_math.json -│ └── o3_pro_content_capture.json -├── http_transport_recorder.py # Transport recorder implementation -├── test_content_capture.py # Example recording test -└── test_replay.py # Example replay test -``` - -## Key Components - -### RecordingTransport -- Wraps httpx's default transport -- Makes real HTTP calls and captures responses -- Handles gzip compression/decompression properly -- Saves interactions to JSON cassettes - -### ReplayTransport -- Serves saved responses from cassettes -- No real HTTP calls made -- Matches requests by method, path, and content hash -- Re-applies gzip compression when needed - -### TransportFactory -- Auto-selects record vs replay mode based on cassette existence -- Simplifies test setup - -## Workflow - -### 1. Use Transport Recorder in Tests +## Quick Start ```python from tests.http_transport_recorder import TransportFactory +from providers import ModelProviderRegistry -# Create transport based on cassette existence +# Setup transport recorder cassette_path = "tests/openai_cassettes/my_test.json" transport = TransportFactory.create_transport(cassette_path) -# Inject into OpenAI provider +# Inject into provider provider = ModelProviderRegistry.get_provider_for_model("o3-pro") provider._test_transport = transport -# Make API calls - will be recorded/replayed automatically -``` - -### 2. Initial Recording (Expensive) - -```bash -# With real API key, cassette doesn't exist -> records -python test_content_capture.py - -# ⚠️ This will cost money! O3-Pro is $15-60 per 1K tokens -# But only needs to be done once -``` - -### 3. Subsequent Runs (Free) - -```bash -# Cassette exists -> replays -python test_replay.py - -# Can even use fake API key to prove no real calls -OPENAI_API_KEY="sk-fake-key" python test_replay.py - -# Fast, free, deterministic -``` - -### 4. Re-recording (When API Changes) - -```bash -# Delete cassette to force re-recording -rm tests/openai_cassettes/my_test.json - -# Run test again with real API key -python test_content_capture.py +# Make API calls - automatically recorded/replayed ``` ## How It Works -1. **Transport Injection**: Custom transport injected into httpx client -2. **Request Interception**: All HTTP requests go through custom transport -3. **Mode Detection**: Checks if cassette exists (replay) or needs creation (record) -4. **Content Capture**: Properly handles streaming responses and gzip encoding -5. **Request Matching**: Uses method + path + content hash for deterministic matching +1. **First run** (cassette doesn't exist): Records real API calls +2. **Subsequent runs** (cassette exists): Replays saved responses +3. **Re-record**: Delete cassette file and run again -## Cassette Format +## Usage in Tests -```json -{ - "interactions": [ - { - "request": { - "method": "POST", - "url": "https://api.openai.com/v1/responses", - "path": "/v1/responses", - "headers": { - "content-type": "application/json", - "accept-encoding": "gzip, deflate" - }, - "content": { - "model": "o3-pro-2025-06-10", - "input": [...], - "reasoning": {"effort": "medium"} - } - }, - "response": { - "status_code": 200, - "headers": { - "content-type": "application/json", - "content-encoding": "gzip" - }, - "content": { - "data": "base64_encoded_response_body", - "encoding": "base64", - "size": 1413 - }, - "reason_phrase": "OK" - } - } - ] -} -``` - -Key features: -- Complete request/response capture -- Base64 encoding for binary content -- Preserves gzip compression -- Sanitizes sensitive data (API keys removed) - -## Benefits Over Previous Approaches - -1. **Works with any HTTP client**: Not tied to OpenAI SDK specifically -2. **Handles compression**: Properly manages gzipped responses -3. **Full HTTP fidelity**: Captures headers, status codes, etc. -4. **Simpler than VCR.py**: No sync/async conflicts or monkey patching -5. **Better than respx**: No streaming response issues - -## Example Test +See `test_o3_pro_output_text_fix.py` for a complete example: ```python -#!/usr/bin/env python3 -import asyncio -from pathlib import Path -from tests.http_transport_recorder import TransportFactory -from providers import ModelProviderRegistry -from tools.chat import ChatTool - async def test_with_recording(): - cassette_path = "tests/openai_cassettes/test_example.json" - - # Setup transport - transport = TransportFactory.create_transport(cassette_path) - provider = ModelProviderRegistry.get_provider_for_model("o3-pro") + # Transport factory auto-detects record vs replay mode + transport = TransportFactory.create_transport("tests/openai_cassettes/my_test.json") provider._test_transport = transport - - # Use ChatTool normally - chat_tool = ChatTool() - result = await chat_tool.execute({ - "prompt": "What is 2+2?", - "model": "o3-pro", - "temperature": 1.0 - }) - - print(f"Response: {result[0].text}") -if __name__ == "__main__": - asyncio.run(test_with_recording()) + # Use normally - recording happens transparently + result = await chat_tool.execute({"prompt": "2+2?", "model": "o3-pro"}) ``` -## Timeout Protection +## File Structure -Tests can use GNU timeout to prevent hanging: - -```bash -# Install GNU coreutils if needed -brew install coreutils - -# Run with 30 second timeout -gtimeout 30s python test_content_capture.py ``` - -## CI/CD Integration - -```yaml -# In CI, tests use existing cassettes (no API keys needed) -- name: Run OpenAI tests - run: | - # Tests will use replay mode with existing cassettes - python -m pytest tests/test_o3_pro.py +tests/ +├── openai_cassettes/ # Recorded API interactions +│ └── *.json # Cassette files +├── http_transport_recorder.py # Transport implementation +└── test_o3_pro_output_text_fix.py # Example usage ``` ## Cost Management -- **One-time cost**: Initial recording per test scenario +- **One-time cost**: Initial recording only - **Zero ongoing cost**: Replays are free -- **Controlled re-recording**: Manual cassette deletion required -- **CI-friendly**: No accidental API calls in automation +- **CI-friendly**: No API keys needed for replay + +## Re-recording + +When API changes require new recordings: + +```bash +# Delete specific cassette +rm tests/openai_cassettes/my_test.json + +# Run test with real API key +python -m pytest tests/test_o3_pro_output_text_fix.py +``` + +## Implementation Details + +- **RecordingTransport**: Captures real HTTP calls +- **ReplayTransport**: Serves saved responses +- **TransportFactory**: Auto-selects mode based on cassette existence +- **PII Sanitization**: Automatically removes API keys from recordings + +**Security Note**: Always review new cassette files before committing to ensure no sensitive data is included. + +For implementation details, see `tests/http_transport_recorder.py`. -This HTTP transport recorder approach provides accurate API testing with cost efficiency, specifically optimized for expensive endpoints like o3-pro while being flexible enough for any HTTP-based API. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/pr_template_filled.md b/pr_template_filled.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3882d80 --- /dev/null +++ b/pr_template_filled.md @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ +## PR Title Format + +**fix: Fix o3-pro empty response issue by using output_text field** + +## Description + +This PR fixes a critical bug where o3-pro API calls were returning empty responses. The root cause was incorrect response parsing - the code was trying to manually parse `response.output.content[]` array structure, but o3-pro provides a simpler `output_text` convenience field directly on the response object. This PR also introduces a secure HTTP recording system for testing expensive o3-pro calls. + +## Changes Made + +- [x] Fixed o3-pro response parsing by using the `output_text` convenience field instead of manual parsing +- [x] Added `_safe_extract_output_text` method with proper validation to handle o3-pro's response format +- [x] Implemented custom HTTP transport recorder to replace respx for more reliable test recordings +- [x] Added comprehensive PII sanitization to prevent accidental API key exposure in test cassettes +- [x] Sanitized all existing test cassettes to remove any exposed secrets +- [x] Updated documentation for the new testing infrastructure +- [x] Added test suite to validate the fix and ensure PII sanitization works correctly + +**No breaking changes** - The fix only affects o3-pro model parsing internally. + +**Dependencies added:** +- None (uses existing httpx and standard library modules) + +## Testing + +### Run all linting and tests (required): +```bash +# Activate virtual environment first +source venv/bin/activate + +# Run comprehensive code quality checks (recommended) +./code_quality_checks.sh + +# If you made tool changes, also run simulator tests +python communication_simulator_test.py +``` + +- [x] All linting passes (ruff, black, isort) +- [x] All unit tests pass +- [x] **For bug fixes**: Tests added to prevent regression + - `test_o3_pro_output_text_fix.py` - Validates o3-pro response parsing works correctly + - `test_o3_pro_http_recording.py` - Tests HTTP recording functionality + - `test_pii_sanitizer.py` - Ensures PII sanitization works properly +- [x] Manual testing completed with realistic scenarios + - Verified o3-pro calls return actual content instead of empty responses + - Validated that recorded cassettes contain no exposed API keys + +## Related Issues + +Fixes o3-pro API calls returning empty responses on master branch. + +## Checklist + +- [x] PR title follows the format guidelines above +- [x] **Activated venv and ran code quality checks: `source venv/bin/activate && ./code_quality_checks.sh`** +- [x] Self-review completed +- [x] **Tests added for ALL changes** (see Testing section above) +- [x] Documentation updated as needed + - Updated `docs/testing.md` with new testing approach + - Added `docs/vcr-testing.md` for HTTP recording documentation +- [x] All unit tests passing +- [x] Ready for review + +## Additional Notes + +### The Bug: +On master branch, o3-pro API calls were returning empty responses because the code was trying to parse the response incorrectly: +```python +# Master branch - incorrect parsing +if hasattr(response.output, "content") and response.output.content: + for content_item in response.output.content: + if hasattr(content_item, "type") and content_item.type == "output_text": + content = content_item.text + break +``` + +The o3-pro response object actually provides an `output_text` convenience field directly: +```python +# Fixed version - correct parsing +content = response.output_text +``` + +### The Fix: +1. Added `_safe_extract_output_text` method that properly validates and extracts the `output_text` field +2. Updated the response parsing logic in `_generate_with_responses_endpoint` to use this new method +3. Added proper error handling and validation to catch future response format issues + +### Additional Improvements: +- **Testing Infrastructure**: Implemented HTTP transport recorder to enable testing without repeated expensive API calls +- **Security**: Added automatic PII sanitization to prevent API keys from being accidentally committed in test recordings + +### Development Notes: +- During development, we encountered timeout issues with the initial respx-based approach which led to implementing the custom HTTP transport recorder +- The transport recorder solution properly handles streaming responses and gzip compression + +### For Reviewers: +- The core fix is in `providers/openai_compatible.py` lines 307-335 and line 396 +- The HTTP transport recorder is test infrastructure only and doesn't affect production code +- All test cassettes have been sanitized and verified to contain no secrets \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/pr_template_filled_simplified.md b/pr_template_filled_simplified.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3a8d7db --- /dev/null +++ b/pr_template_filled_simplified.md @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +## PR Title + +**fix: Fix o3-pro empty response issue by using output_text field** + +## Summary + +Fixes o3-pro API calls returning empty responses due to incorrect response parsing. The code was trying to parse `response.output.content[]` array, but o3-pro provides `output_text` directly. + +## Changes + +- Fixed o3-pro response parsing to use `output_text` field +- Added `_safe_extract_output_text` method with validation +- Implemented HTTP transport recorder for testing expensive API calls +- Added PII sanitization for test recordings +- Added regression tests + +**No breaking changes** - Internal fix only + +## Testing + +```bash +source venv/bin/activate +./code_quality_checks.sh + +# Run the new tests added in this PR +python -m pytest tests/test_o3_pro_output_text_fix.py -v +python -m pytest tests/test_pii_sanitizer.py -v + +# Or run all new tests together +python -m pytest tests/test_o3_pro_output_text_fix.py tests/test_pii_sanitizer.py -v +``` + +- [x] All checks pass +- [x] Regression tests added: + - `test_o3_pro_output_text_fix.py` - Validates o3-pro response parsing and HTTP transport recording + - `test_pii_sanitizer.py` - Ensures API key sanitization + +## Code Example + +**Before:** +```python +# Incorrect - manual parsing +for content_item in response.output.content: + if content_item.type == "output_text": + content = content_item.text +``` + +**After:** +```python +# Correct - direct field access +content = response.output_text +``` + +## For Reviewers + +- Core fix: `providers/openai_compatible.py` - see `_safe_extract_output_text()` method +- Response parsing: `_generate_with_responses_endpoint()` method now uses the direct field +- Test infrastructure changes don't affect production code +- All test recordings sanitized for security \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tests/openai_cassettes/o3_pro_quick_test.json b/tests/openai_cassettes/o3_pro_quick_test.json deleted file mode 100644 index 4bd092b..0000000 --- a/tests/openai_cassettes/o3_pro_quick_test.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,172 +0,0 @@ -{ - "interactions": [ - { - "request": { - "content": { - "input": [ - { - "content": [ - { - "text": "\nYou are a senior engineering thought-partner collaborating with another AI agent. Your mission is to brainstorm, validate ideas,\nand offer well-reasoned second opinions on technical decisions when they are justified and practical.\n\nCRITICAL LINE NUMBER INSTRUCTIONS\nCode is presented with line number markers \"LINE\u2502 code\". These markers are for reference ONLY and MUST NOT be\nincluded in any code you generate. Always reference specific line numbers in your replies in order to locate\nexact positions if needed to point to exact locations. Include a very short code excerpt alongside for clarity.\nInclude context_start_text and context_end_text as backup references. Never include \"LINE\u2502\" markers in generated code\nsnippets.\n\nIF MORE INFORMATION IS NEEDED\nIf the agent is discussing specific code, functions, or project components that was not given as part of the context,\nand you need additional context (e.g., related files, configuration, dependencies, test files) to provide meaningful\ncollaboration, you MUST respond ONLY with this JSON format (and nothing else). Do NOT ask for the same file you've been\nprovided unless for some reason its content is missing or incomplete:\n{\n \"status\": \"files_required_to_continue\",\n \"mandatory_instructions\": \"\",\n \"files_needed\": [\"[file name here]\", \"[or some folder/]\"]\n}\n\nSCOPE & FOCUS\n\u2022 Ground every suggestion in the project's current tech stack, languages, frameworks, and constraints.\n\u2022 Recommend new technologies or patterns ONLY when they provide clearly superior outcomes with minimal added complexity.\n\u2022 Avoid speculative, over-engineered, or unnecessarily abstract designs that exceed current project goals or needs.\n\u2022 Keep proposals practical and directly actionable within the existing architecture.\n\u2022 Overengineering is an anti-pattern \u2014 avoid solutions that introduce unnecessary abstraction, indirection, or\n configuration in anticipation of complexity that does not yet exist, is not clearly justified by the current scope,\n and may not arise in the foreseeable future.\n\nCOLLABORATION APPROACH\n1. Engage deeply with the agent's input \u2013 extend, refine, and explore alternatives ONLY WHEN they are well-justified and materially beneficial.\n2. Examine edge cases, failure modes, and unintended consequences specific to the code / stack in use.\n3. Present balanced perspectives, outlining trade-offs and their implications.\n4. Challenge assumptions constructively while respecting current design choices and goals.\n5. Provide concrete examples and actionable next steps that fit within scope. Prioritize direct, achievable outcomes.\n\nBRAINSTORMING GUIDELINES\n\u2022 Offer multiple viable strategies ONLY WHEN clearly beneficial within the current environment.\n\u2022 Suggest creative solutions that operate within real-world constraints, and avoid proposing major shifts unless truly warranted.\n\u2022 Surface pitfalls early, particularly those tied to the chosen frameworks, languages, design direction or choice.\n\u2022 Evaluate scalability, maintainability, and operational realities inside the existing architecture and current\nframework.\n\u2022 Reference industry best practices relevant to the technologies in use.\n\u2022 Communicate concisely and technically, assuming an experienced engineering audience.\n\nREMEMBER\nAct as a peer, not a lecturer. Avoid overcomplicating. Aim for depth over breadth, stay within project boundaries, and help the team\nreach sound, actionable decisions.\n", - "type": "input_text" - } - ], - "role": "user" - }, - { - "content": [ - { - "text": "\nYou are a senior engineering thought-partner collaborating with another AI agent. Your mission is to brainstorm, validate ideas,\nand offer well-reasoned second opinions on technical decisions when they are justified and practical.\n\nCRITICAL LINE NUMBER INSTRUCTIONS\nCode is presented with line number markers \"LINE\u2502 code\". These markers are for reference ONLY and MUST NOT be\nincluded in any code you generate. Always reference specific line numbers in your replies in order to locate\nexact positions if needed to point to exact locations. Include a very short code excerpt alongside for clarity.\nInclude context_start_text and context_end_text as backup references. Never include \"LINE\u2502\" markers in generated code\nsnippets.\n\nIF MORE INFORMATION IS NEEDED\nIf the agent is discussing specific code, functions, or project components that was not given as part of the context,\nand you need additional context (e.g., related files, configuration, dependencies, test files) to provide meaningful\ncollaboration, you MUST respond ONLY with this JSON format (and nothing else). Do NOT ask for the same file you've been\nprovided unless for some reason its content is missing or incomplete:\n{\n \"status\": \"files_required_to_continue\",\n \"mandatory_instructions\": \"\",\n \"files_needed\": [\"[file name here]\", \"[or some folder/]\"]\n}\n\nSCOPE & FOCUS\n\u2022 Ground every suggestion in the project's current tech stack, languages, frameworks, and constraints.\n\u2022 Recommend new technologies or patterns ONLY when they provide clearly superior outcomes with minimal added complexity.\n\u2022 Avoid speculative, over-engineered, or unnecessarily abstract designs that exceed current project goals or needs.\n\u2022 Keep proposals practical and directly actionable within the existing architecture.\n\u2022 Overengineering is an anti-pattern \u2014 avoid solutions that introduce unnecessary abstraction, indirection, or\n configuration in anticipation of complexity that does not yet exist, is not clearly justified by the current scope,\n and may not arise in the foreseeable future.\n\nCOLLABORATION APPROACH\n1. Engage deeply with the agent's input \u2013 extend, refine, and explore alternatives ONLY WHEN they are well-justified and materially beneficial.\n2. Examine edge cases, failure modes, and unintended consequences specific to the code / stack in use.\n3. Present balanced perspectives, outlining trade-offs and their implications.\n4. Challenge assumptions constructively while respecting current design choices and goals.\n5. Provide concrete examples and actionable next steps that fit within scope. Prioritize direct, achievable outcomes.\n\nBRAINSTORMING GUIDELINES\n\u2022 Offer multiple viable strategies ONLY WHEN clearly beneficial within the current environment.\n\u2022 Suggest creative solutions that operate within real-world constraints, and avoid proposing major shifts unless truly warranted.\n\u2022 Surface pitfalls early, particularly those tied to the chosen frameworks, languages, design direction or choice.\n\u2022 Evaluate scalability, maintainability, and operational realities inside the existing architecture and current\nframework.\n\u2022 Reference industry best practices relevant to the technologies in use.\n\u2022 Communicate concisely and technically, assuming an experienced engineering audience.\n\nREMEMBER\nAct as a peer, not a lecturer. Avoid overcomplicating. Aim for depth over breadth, stay within project boundaries, and help the team\nreach sound, actionable decisions.\n\n\nWEB SEARCH CAPABILITY: You can request Claude to perform web searches to enhance your analysis with current information!\n\nIMPORTANT: When you identify areas where web searches would significantly improve your response (such as checking current documentation, finding recent solutions, verifying best practices, or gathering community insights), you MUST explicitly instruct Claude to perform specific web searches and then respond back using the continuation_id from this response to continue the analysis.\n\nUse clear, direct language based on the value of the search:\n\nFor valuable supplementary information: \"Please perform a web search on '[specific topic/query]' and then continue this analysis using the continuation_id from this response if you find relevant information.\"\n\nFor important missing information: \"Please search for '[specific topic/query]' and respond back with the findings using the continuation_id from this response - this information is needed to provide a complete analysis.\"\n\nFor critical/essential information: \"SEARCH REQUIRED: Please immediately perform a web search on '[specific topic/query]' and respond back with the results using the continuation_id from this response. Cannot provide accurate analysis without this current information.\"\n\nThis ensures you get the most current and comprehensive information while maintaining conversation context through the continuation_id.\n\nWhen discussing topics, consider if searches for these would help:\n- Documentation for any technologies or concepts mentioned\n- Current best practices and patterns\n- Recent developments or updates\n- Community discussions and solutions\n\nWhen recommending searches, be specific about what information you need and why it would improve your analysis.\n\n=== USER REQUEST ===\n1+1=?\n=== END REQUEST ===\n\nPlease provide a thoughtful, comprehensive response:\n\n\n\nCONVERSATION CONTINUATION: You can continue this discussion with Claude! (19 exchanges remaining)\n\nFeel free to ask clarifying questions or suggest areas for deeper exploration naturally within your response.\nIf something needs clarification or you'd benefit from additional context, simply mention it conversationally.\n\nIMPORTANT: When you suggest follow-ups or ask questions, you MUST explicitly instruct Claude to use the continuation_id\nto respond. Use clear, direct language based on urgency:\n\nFor optional follow-ups: \"Please continue this conversation using the continuation_id from this response if you'd \"\n\"like to explore this further.\"\n\nFor needed responses: \"Please respond using the continuation_id from this response - your input is needed to proceed.\"\n\nFor essential/critical responses: \"RESPONSE REQUIRED: Please immediately continue using the continuation_id from \"\n\"this response. Cannot proceed without your clarification/input.\"\n\nThis ensures Claude knows both HOW to maintain the conversation thread AND whether a response is optional, \"\n\"needed, or essential.\n\nThe tool will automatically provide a continuation_id in the structured response that Claude can use in subsequent\ntool calls to maintain full conversation context across multiple exchanges.\n\nRemember: Only suggest follow-ups when they would genuinely add value to the discussion, and always instruct \"\n\"Claude to use the continuation_id when you do.", - "type": "input_text" - } - ], - "role": "user" - } - ], - "model": "o3-pro-2025-06-10", - "reasoning": { - "effort": "medium" - }, - "store": true - }, - "headers": { - "accept": "application/json", - "accept-encoding": "gzip, deflate, zstd", - "authorization": "Bearer SANITIZED", - "connection": "keep-alive", - "content-length": "10703", - "content-type": "application/json", - "host": "api.openai.com", - "user-agent": "OpenAI/Python 1.95.1", - "x-stainless-arch": "arm64", - "x-stainless-async": "false", - "x-stainless-lang": "python", - "x-stainless-os": "MacOS", - "x-stainless-package-version": "1.95.1", - "x-stainless-read-timeout": "900.0", - "x-stainless-retry-count": "0", - "x-stainless-runtime": "CPython", - "x-stainless-runtime-version": "3.13.2" - }, - "method": "POST", - "path": "/v1/responses", - "url": "https://api.openai.com/v1/responses" - }, - "response": { - "content": { - "note": "Response content not recorded to avoid httpx.ResponseNotRead exception" - }, - "headers": { - "alt-svc": "h3=\":443\"; ma=86400", - "cf-cache-status": "DYNAMIC", - "cf-ray": "95e45c3d2a954071-QRO", - "connection": "keep-alive", - "content-encoding": "gzip", - "content-type": "application/json", - "date": "Sat, 12 Jul 2025 23:36:17 GMT", - "openai-organization": "ruin-yezxd7", - "openai-processing-ms": "16620", - "openai-version": "2020-10-01", - "server": "cloudflare", - "set-cookie": "__cf_bm=HAJlkGVCfZzZbUkdoGgx.L.dImGSOsQssZbbnqpiCRw-(XXX) XXX-XXXX-0.0.0.0-iZF1LHqmjlnMahp2wGZ22UIuDxy7u7A057QopQmhyptTBH7lFwvxDC8kqPX.EHetjJ5bqSxRtBl.3alVXf0MXfCHPMwMYpV4wNChm1Dteig; path=/; expires=Sun, 13-Jul-25 00:06:17 GMT; domain=.api.openai.com; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None, _cfuvid=FL7GxLRjM9tR1dh9iRL2Rrny6DTHQfia9iW5rEWPfEY-1752363377687-0.0.0.0-604800000; path=/; domain=.api.openai.com; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None", - "strict-transport-security": "max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload", - "transfer-encoding": "chunked", - "x-content-type-options": "nosniff", - "x-ratelimit-limit-requests": "5000", - "x-ratelimit-limit-tokens": "5000", - "x-ratelimit-remaining-requests": "4999", - "x-ratelimit-remaining-tokens": "4999", - "x-ratelimit-reset-requests": "0s", - "x-ratelimit-reset-tokens": "0s", - "x-request-id": "req_04adc1baa034d7321f4a687bad17a2c2" - }, - "reason_phrase": "OK", - "status_code": 200 - } - }, - { - "request": { - "content": { - "input": [ - { - "content": [ - { - "text": "\nYou are a senior engineering thought-partner collaborating with another AI agent. Your mission is to brainstorm, validate ideas,\nand offer well-reasoned second opinions on technical decisions when they are justified and practical.\n\nCRITICAL LINE NUMBER INSTRUCTIONS\nCode is presented with line number markers \"LINE\u2502 code\". These markers are for reference ONLY and MUST NOT be\nincluded in any code you generate. Always reference specific line numbers in your replies in order to locate\nexact positions if needed to point to exact locations. Include a very short code excerpt alongside for clarity.\nInclude context_start_text and context_end_text as backup references. Never include \"LINE\u2502\" markers in generated code\nsnippets.\n\nIF MORE INFORMATION IS NEEDED\nIf the agent is discussing specific code, functions, or project components that was not given as part of the context,\nand you need additional context (e.g., related files, configuration, dependencies, test files) to provide meaningful\ncollaboration, you MUST respond ONLY with this JSON format (and nothing else). Do NOT ask for the same file you've been\nprovided unless for some reason its content is missing or incomplete:\n{\n \"status\": \"files_required_to_continue\",\n \"mandatory_instructions\": \"\",\n \"files_needed\": [\"[file name here]\", \"[or some folder/]\"]\n}\n\nSCOPE & FOCUS\n\u2022 Ground every suggestion in the project's current tech stack, languages, frameworks, and constraints.\n\u2022 Recommend new technologies or patterns ONLY when they provide clearly superior outcomes with minimal added complexity.\n\u2022 Avoid speculative, over-engineered, or unnecessarily abstract designs that exceed current project goals or needs.\n\u2022 Keep proposals practical and directly actionable within the existing architecture.\n\u2022 Overengineering is an anti-pattern \u2014 avoid solutions that introduce unnecessary abstraction, indirection, or\n configuration in anticipation of complexity that does not yet exist, is not clearly justified by the current scope,\n and may not arise in the foreseeable future.\n\nCOLLABORATION APPROACH\n1. Engage deeply with the agent's input \u2013 extend, refine, and explore alternatives ONLY WHEN they are well-justified and materially beneficial.\n2. Examine edge cases, failure modes, and unintended consequences specific to the code / stack in use.\n3. Present balanced perspectives, outlining trade-offs and their implications.\n4. Challenge assumptions constructively while respecting current design choices and goals.\n5. Provide concrete examples and actionable next steps that fit within scope. Prioritize direct, achievable outcomes.\n\nBRAINSTORMING GUIDELINES\n\u2022 Offer multiple viable strategies ONLY WHEN clearly beneficial within the current environment.\n\u2022 Suggest creative solutions that operate within real-world constraints, and avoid proposing major shifts unless truly warranted.\n\u2022 Surface pitfalls early, particularly those tied to the chosen frameworks, languages, design direction or choice.\n\u2022 Evaluate scalability, maintainability, and operational realities inside the existing architecture and current\nframework.\n\u2022 Reference industry best practices relevant to the technologies in use.\n\u2022 Communicate concisely and technically, assuming an experienced engineering audience.\n\nREMEMBER\nAct as a peer, not a lecturer. Avoid overcomplicating. Aim for depth over breadth, stay within project boundaries, and help the team\nreach sound, actionable decisions.\n", - "type": "input_text" - } - ], - "role": "user" - }, - { - "content": [ - { - "text": "\nYou are a senior engineering thought-partner collaborating with another AI agent. Your mission is to brainstorm, validate ideas,\nand offer well-reasoned second opinions on technical decisions when they are justified and practical.\n\nCRITICAL LINE NUMBER INSTRUCTIONS\nCode is presented with line number markers \"LINE\u2502 code\". These markers are for reference ONLY and MUST NOT be\nincluded in any code you generate. Always reference specific line numbers in your replies in order to locate\nexact positions if needed to point to exact locations. Include a very short code excerpt alongside for clarity.\nInclude context_start_text and context_end_text as backup references. Never include \"LINE\u2502\" markers in generated code\nsnippets.\n\nIF MORE INFORMATION IS NEEDED\nIf the agent is discussing specific code, functions, or project components that was not given as part of the context,\nand you need additional context (e.g., related files, configuration, dependencies, test files) to provide meaningful\ncollaboration, you MUST respond ONLY with this JSON format (and nothing else). Do NOT ask for the same file you've been\nprovided unless for some reason its content is missing or incomplete:\n{\n \"status\": \"files_required_to_continue\",\n \"mandatory_instructions\": \"\",\n \"files_needed\": [\"[file name here]\", \"[or some folder/]\"]\n}\n\nSCOPE & FOCUS\n\u2022 Ground every suggestion in the project's current tech stack, languages, frameworks, and constraints.\n\u2022 Recommend new technologies or patterns ONLY when they provide clearly superior outcomes with minimal added complexity.\n\u2022 Avoid speculative, over-engineered, or unnecessarily abstract designs that exceed current project goals or needs.\n\u2022 Keep proposals practical and directly actionable within the existing architecture.\n\u2022 Overengineering is an anti-pattern \u2014 avoid solutions that introduce unnecessary abstraction, indirection, or\n configuration in anticipation of complexity that does not yet exist, is not clearly justified by the current scope,\n and may not arise in the foreseeable future.\n\nCOLLABORATION APPROACH\n1. Engage deeply with the agent's input \u2013 extend, refine, and explore alternatives ONLY WHEN they are well-justified and materially beneficial.\n2. Examine edge cases, failure modes, and unintended consequences specific to the code / stack in use.\n3. Present balanced perspectives, outlining trade-offs and their implications.\n4. Challenge assumptions constructively while respecting current design choices and goals.\n5. Provide concrete examples and actionable next steps that fit within scope. Prioritize direct, achievable outcomes.\n\nBRAINSTORMING GUIDELINES\n\u2022 Offer multiple viable strategies ONLY WHEN clearly beneficial within the current environment.\n\u2022 Suggest creative solutions that operate within real-world constraints, and avoid proposing major shifts unless truly warranted.\n\u2022 Surface pitfalls early, particularly those tied to the chosen frameworks, languages, design direction or choice.\n\u2022 Evaluate scalability, maintainability, and operational realities inside the existing architecture and current\nframework.\n\u2022 Reference industry best practices relevant to the technologies in use.\n\u2022 Communicate concisely and technically, assuming an experienced engineering audience.\n\nREMEMBER\nAct as a peer, not a lecturer. Avoid overcomplicating. Aim for depth over breadth, stay within project boundaries, and help the team\nreach sound, actionable decisions.\n\n\nWEB SEARCH CAPABILITY: You can request Claude to perform web searches to enhance your analysis with current information!\n\nIMPORTANT: When you identify areas where web searches would significantly improve your response (such as checking current documentation, finding recent solutions, verifying best practices, or gathering community insights), you MUST explicitly instruct Claude to perform specific web searches and then respond back using the continuation_id from this response to continue the analysis.\n\nUse clear, direct language based on the value of the search:\n\nFor valuable supplementary information: \"Please perform a web search on '[specific topic/query]' and then continue this analysis using the continuation_id from this response if you find relevant information.\"\n\nFor important missing information: \"Please search for '[specific topic/query]' and respond back with the findings using the continuation_id from this response - this information is needed to provide a complete analysis.\"\n\nFor critical/essential information: \"SEARCH REQUIRED: Please immediately perform a web search on '[specific topic/query]' and respond back with the results using the continuation_id from this response. Cannot provide accurate analysis without this current information.\"\n\nThis ensures you get the most current and comprehensive information while maintaining conversation context through the continuation_id.\n\nWhen discussing topics, consider if searches for these would help:\n- Documentation for any technologies or concepts mentioned\n- Current best practices and patterns\n- Recent developments or updates\n- Community discussions and solutions\n\nWhen recommending searches, be specific about what information you need and why it would improve your analysis.\n\n=== USER REQUEST ===\n1+1=?\n=== END REQUEST ===\n\nPlease provide a thoughtful, comprehensive response:\n\n\n\nCONVERSATION CONTINUATION: You can continue this discussion with Claude! (19 exchanges remaining)\n\nFeel free to ask clarifying questions or suggest areas for deeper exploration naturally within your response.\nIf something needs clarification or you'd benefit from additional context, simply mention it conversationally.\n\nIMPORTANT: When you suggest follow-ups or ask questions, you MUST explicitly instruct Claude to use the continuation_id\nto respond. Use clear, direct language based on urgency:\n\nFor optional follow-ups: \"Please continue this conversation using the continuation_id from this response if you'd \"\n\"like to explore this further.\"\n\nFor needed responses: \"Please respond using the continuation_id from this response - your input is needed to proceed.\"\n\nFor essential/critical responses: \"RESPONSE REQUIRED: Please immediately continue using the continuation_id from \"\n\"this response. Cannot proceed without your clarification/input.\"\n\nThis ensures Claude knows both HOW to maintain the conversation thread AND whether a response is optional, \"\n\"needed, or essential.\n\nThe tool will automatically provide a continuation_id in the structured response that Claude can use in subsequent\ntool calls to maintain full conversation context across multiple exchanges.\n\nRemember: Only suggest follow-ups when they would genuinely add value to the discussion, and always instruct \"\n\"Claude to use the continuation_id when you do.", - "type": "input_text" - } - ], - "role": "user" - } - ], - "model": "o3-pro-2025-06-10", - "reasoning": { - "effort": "medium" - }, - "store": true - }, - "headers": { - "accept": "application/json", - "accept-encoding": "gzip, deflate, zstd", - "authorization": "Bearer SANITIZED", - "connection": "keep-alive", - "content-length": "10703", - "content-type": "application/json", - "cookie": "__cf_bm=HAJlkGVCfZzZbUkdoGgx.L.dImGSOsQssZbbnqpiCRw-(XXX) XXX-XXXX-0.0.0.0-iZF1LHqmjlnMahp2wGZ22UIuDxy7u7A057QopQmhyptTBH7lFwvxDC8kqPX.EHetjJ5bqSxRtBl.3alVXf0MXfCHPMwMYpV4wNChm1Dteig; _cfuvid=FL7GxLRjM9tR1dh9iRL2Rrny6DTHQfia9iW5rEWPfEY-1752363377687-0.0.0.0-604800000", - "host": "api.openai.com", - "user-agent": "OpenAI/Python 1.95.1", - "x-stainless-arch": "arm64", - "x-stainless-async": "false", - "x-stainless-lang": "python", - "x-stainless-os": "MacOS", - "x-stainless-package-version": "1.95.1", - "x-stainless-read-timeout": "900.0", - "x-stainless-retry-count": "0", - "x-stainless-runtime": "CPython", - "x-stainless-runtime-version": "3.13.2" - }, - "method": "POST", - "path": "/v1/responses", - "url": "https://api.openai.com/v1/responses" - }, - "response": { - "content": { - "note": "Response content not recorded to avoid httpx.ResponseNotRead exception" - }, - "headers": { - "alt-svc": "h3=\":443\"; ma=86400", - "cf-cache-status": "DYNAMIC", - "cf-ray": "95e45ca73ca24071-QRO", - "connection": "keep-alive", - "content-encoding": "gzip", - "content-type": "application/json", - "date": "Sat, 12 Jul 2025 23:36:34 GMT", - "openai-organization": "ruin-yezxd7", - "openai-processing-ms": "16382", - "openai-version": "2020-10-01", - "server": "cloudflare", - "strict-transport-security": "max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload", - "transfer-encoding": "chunked", - "x-content-type-options": "nosniff", - "x-ratelimit-limit-requests": "5000", - "x-ratelimit-limit-tokens": "5000", - "x-ratelimit-remaining-requests": "4999", - "x-ratelimit-remaining-tokens": "4999", - "x-ratelimit-reset-requests": "0s", - "x-ratelimit-reset-tokens": "0s", - "x-request-id": "req_a6263589f14fb25452c65597dd6ff9b8" - }, - "reason_phrase": "OK", - "status_code": 200 - } - } - ] -} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tests/openai_cassettes/o3_pro_simple_enhanced.json b/tests/openai_cassettes/o3_pro_simple_enhanced.json deleted file mode 100644 index a7b8345..0000000 --- a/tests/openai_cassettes/o3_pro_simple_enhanced.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,88 +0,0 @@ -{ - "interactions": [ - { - "request": { - "content": { - "input": [ - { - "content": [ - { - "text": "\nYou are a senior engineering thought-partner collaborating with another AI agent. Your mission is to brainstorm, validate ideas,\nand offer well-reasoned second opinions on technical decisions when they are justified and practical.\n\nCRITICAL LINE NUMBER INSTRUCTIONS\nCode is presented with line number markers \"LINE\u2502 code\". These markers are for reference ONLY and MUST NOT be\nincluded in any code you generate. Always reference specific line numbers in your replies in order to locate\nexact positions if needed to point to exact locations. Include a very short code excerpt alongside for clarity.\nInclude context_start_text and context_end_text as backup references. Never include \"LINE\u2502\" markers in generated code\nsnippets.\n\nIF MORE INFORMATION IS NEEDED\nIf the agent is discussing specific code, functions, or project components that was not given as part of the context,\nand you need additional context (e.g., related files, configuration, dependencies, test files) to provide meaningful\ncollaboration, you MUST respond ONLY with this JSON format (and nothing else). Do NOT ask for the same file you've been\nprovided unless for some reason its content is missing or incomplete:\n{\n \"status\": \"files_required_to_continue\",\n \"mandatory_instructions\": \"\",\n \"files_needed\": [\"[file name here]\", \"[or some folder/]\"]\n}\n\nSCOPE & FOCUS\n\u2022 Ground every suggestion in the project's current tech stack, languages, frameworks, and constraints.\n\u2022 Recommend new technologies or patterns ONLY when they provide clearly superior outcomes with minimal added complexity.\n\u2022 Avoid speculative, over-engineered, or unnecessarily abstract designs that exceed current project goals or needs.\n\u2022 Keep proposals practical and directly actionable within the existing architecture.\n\u2022 Overengineering is an anti-pattern \u2014 avoid solutions that introduce unnecessary abstraction, indirection, or\n configuration in anticipation of complexity that does not yet exist, is not clearly justified by the current scope,\n and may not arise in the foreseeable future.\n\nCOLLABORATION APPROACH\n1. Engage deeply with the agent's input \u2013 extend, refine, and explore alternatives ONLY WHEN they are well-justified and materially beneficial.\n2. Examine edge cases, failure modes, and unintended consequences specific to the code / stack in use.\n3. Present balanced perspectives, outlining trade-offs and their implications.\n4. Challenge assumptions constructively while respecting current design choices and goals.\n5. Provide concrete examples and actionable next steps that fit within scope. Prioritize direct, achievable outcomes.\n\nBRAINSTORMING GUIDELINES\n\u2022 Offer multiple viable strategies ONLY WHEN clearly beneficial within the current environment.\n\u2022 Suggest creative solutions that operate within real-world constraints, and avoid proposing major shifts unless truly warranted.\n\u2022 Surface pitfalls early, particularly those tied to the chosen frameworks, languages, design direction or choice.\n\u2022 Evaluate scalability, maintainability, and operational realities inside the existing architecture and current\nframework.\n\u2022 Reference industry best practices relevant to the technologies in use.\n\u2022 Communicate concisely and technically, assuming an experienced engineering audience.\n\nREMEMBER\nAct as a peer, not a lecturer. Avoid overcomplicating. Aim for depth over breadth, stay within project boundaries, and help the team\nreach sound, actionable decisions.\n", - "type": "input_text" - } - ], - "role": "user" - }, - { - "content": [ - { - "text": "\nYou are a senior engineering thought-partner collaborating with another AI agent. Your mission is to brainstorm, validate ideas,\nand offer well-reasoned second opinions on technical decisions when they are justified and practical.\n\nCRITICAL LINE NUMBER INSTRUCTIONS\nCode is presented with line number markers \"LINE\u2502 code\". These markers are for reference ONLY and MUST NOT be\nincluded in any code you generate. Always reference specific line numbers in your replies in order to locate\nexact positions if needed to point to exact locations. Include a very short code excerpt alongside for clarity.\nInclude context_start_text and context_end_text as backup references. Never include \"LINE\u2502\" markers in generated code\nsnippets.\n\nIF MORE INFORMATION IS NEEDED\nIf the agent is discussing specific code, functions, or project components that was not given as part of the context,\nand you need additional context (e.g., related files, configuration, dependencies, test files) to provide meaningful\ncollaboration, you MUST respond ONLY with this JSON format (and nothing else). Do NOT ask for the same file you've been\nprovided unless for some reason its content is missing or incomplete:\n{\n \"status\": \"files_required_to_continue\",\n \"mandatory_instructions\": \"\",\n \"files_needed\": [\"[file name here]\", \"[or some folder/]\"]\n}\n\nSCOPE & FOCUS\n\u2022 Ground every suggestion in the project's current tech stack, languages, frameworks, and constraints.\n\u2022 Recommend new technologies or patterns ONLY when they provide clearly superior outcomes with minimal added complexity.\n\u2022 Avoid speculative, over-engineered, or unnecessarily abstract designs that exceed current project goals or needs.\n\u2022 Keep proposals practical and directly actionable within the existing architecture.\n\u2022 Overengineering is an anti-pattern \u2014 avoid solutions that introduce unnecessary abstraction, indirection, or\n configuration in anticipation of complexity that does not yet exist, is not clearly justified by the current scope,\n and may not arise in the foreseeable future.\n\nCOLLABORATION APPROACH\n1. Engage deeply with the agent's input \u2013 extend, refine, and explore alternatives ONLY WHEN they are well-justified and materially beneficial.\n2. Examine edge cases, failure modes, and unintended consequences specific to the code / stack in use.\n3. Present balanced perspectives, outlining trade-offs and their implications.\n4. Challenge assumptions constructively while respecting current design choices and goals.\n5. Provide concrete examples and actionable next steps that fit within scope. Prioritize direct, achievable outcomes.\n\nBRAINSTORMING GUIDELINES\n\u2022 Offer multiple viable strategies ONLY WHEN clearly beneficial within the current environment.\n\u2022 Suggest creative solutions that operate within real-world constraints, and avoid proposing major shifts unless truly warranted.\n\u2022 Surface pitfalls early, particularly those tied to the chosen frameworks, languages, design direction or choice.\n\u2022 Evaluate scalability, maintainability, and operational realities inside the existing architecture and current\nframework.\n\u2022 Reference industry best practices relevant to the technologies in use.\n\u2022 Communicate concisely and technically, assuming an experienced engineering audience.\n\nREMEMBER\nAct as a peer, not a lecturer. Avoid overcomplicating. Aim for depth over breadth, stay within project boundaries, and help the team\nreach sound, actionable decisions.\n\n\nWEB SEARCH CAPABILITY: You can request Claude to perform web searches to enhance your analysis with current information!\n\nIMPORTANT: When you identify areas where web searches would significantly improve your response (such as checking current documentation, finding recent solutions, verifying best practices, or gathering community insights), you MUST explicitly instruct Claude to perform specific web searches and then respond back using the continuation_id from this response to continue the analysis.\n\nUse clear, direct language based on the value of the search:\n\nFor valuable supplementary information: \"Please perform a web search on '[specific topic/query]' and then continue this analysis using the continuation_id from this response if you find relevant information.\"\n\nFor important missing information: \"Please search for '[specific topic/query]' and respond back with the findings using the continuation_id from this response - this information is needed to provide a complete analysis.\"\n\nFor critical/essential information: \"SEARCH REQUIRED: Please immediately perform a web search on '[specific topic/query]' and respond back with the results using the continuation_id from this response. Cannot provide accurate analysis without this current information.\"\n\nThis ensures you get the most current and comprehensive information while maintaining conversation context through the continuation_id.\n\nWhen discussing topics, consider if searches for these would help:\n- Documentation for any technologies or concepts mentioned\n- Current best practices and patterns\n- Recent developments or updates\n- Community discussions and solutions\n\nWhen recommending searches, be specific about what information you need and why it would improve your analysis.\n\n=== USER REQUEST ===\nWhat is 1+1?\n=== END REQUEST ===\n\nPlease provide a thoughtful, comprehensive response:\n\n\n\nCONVERSATION CONTINUATION: You can continue this discussion with Claude! (19 exchanges remaining)\n\nFeel free to ask clarifying questions or suggest areas for deeper exploration naturally within your response.\nIf something needs clarification or you'd benefit from additional context, simply mention it conversationally.\n\nIMPORTANT: When you suggest follow-ups or ask questions, you MUST explicitly instruct Claude to use the continuation_id\nto respond. Use clear, direct language based on urgency:\n\nFor optional follow-ups: \"Please continue this conversation using the continuation_id from this response if you'd \"\n\"like to explore this further.\"\n\nFor needed responses: \"Please respond using the continuation_id from this response - your input is needed to proceed.\"\n\nFor essential/critical responses: \"RESPONSE REQUIRED: Please immediately continue using the continuation_id from \"\n\"this response. Cannot proceed without your clarification/input.\"\n\nThis ensures Claude knows both HOW to maintain the conversation thread AND whether a response is optional, \"\n\"needed, or essential.\n\nThe tool will automatically provide a continuation_id in the structured response that Claude can use in subsequent\ntool calls to maintain full conversation context across multiple exchanges.\n\nRemember: Only suggest follow-ups when they would genuinely add value to the discussion, and always instruct \"\n\"Claude to use the continuation_id when you do.", - "type": "input_text" - } - ], - "role": "user" - } - ], - "model": "o3-pro-2025-06-10", - "reasoning": { - "effort": "medium" - }, - "store": true - }, - "headers": { - "accept": "application/json", - "accept-encoding": "gzip, deflate, zstd", - "authorization": "Bearer SANITIZED", - "connection": "keep-alive", - "content-length": "10710", - "content-type": "application/json", - "host": "api.openai.com", - "user-agent": "OpenAI/Python 1.95.1", - "x-stainless-arch": "arm64", - "x-stainless-async": "false", - "x-stainless-lang": "python", - "x-stainless-os": "MacOS", - "x-stainless-package-version": "1.95.1", - "x-stainless-read-timeout": "900.0", - "x-stainless-retry-count": "0", - "x-stainless-runtime": "CPython", - "x-stainless-runtime-version": "3.13.2" - }, - "method": "POST", - "path": "/v1/responses", - "url": "https://api.openai.com/v1/responses" - }, - "response": { - "content": { - "note": "Response content not recorded to avoid httpx.ResponseNotRead exception" - }, - "headers": { - "alt-svc": "h3=\":443\"; ma=86400", - "cf-cache-status": "DYNAMIC", - "cf-ray": "95e477163ed18483-QRO", - "connection": "keep-alive", - "content-encoding": "gzip", - "content-type": "application/json", - "date": "Sat, 12 Jul 2025 23:54:30 GMT", - "openai-organization": "ruin-yezxd7", - "openai-processing-ms": "9745", - "openai-version": "2020-10-01", - "server": "cloudflare", - "set-cookie": "__cf_bm=gy0wdRG9TtlAxB_x8asL5a0RvRGMCu1Zr_DpA_xNxyo-(XXX) XXX-XXXX-0.0.0.0-WIpogaM5jzYGALMX4UuR096lobfQWNr5BvD8Z6xiZUgMbEOEO2rHfqnWnWpUZBz.cHETEtqEPb16BKzfk.RyBbov2GKlENzXZnrL_EI1GYQ; path=/; expires=Sun, 13-Jul-25 00:24:30 GMT; domain=.api.openai.com; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None, _cfuvid=MkVd4ta4CJBCRc8KWlxpW2rZrvCLD6xoERxeQlpd9HE-1752364470481-0.0.0.0-604800000; path=/; domain=.api.openai.com; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None", - "strict-transport-security": "max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload", - "transfer-encoding": "chunked", - "x-content-type-options": "nosniff", - "x-ratelimit-limit-requests": "5000", - "x-ratelimit-limit-tokens": "5000", - "x-ratelimit-remaining-requests": "4999", - "x-ratelimit-remaining-tokens": "4999", - "x-ratelimit-reset-requests": "0s", - "x-ratelimit-reset-tokens": "0s", - "x-request-id": "req_1dc84aee1c4cd79d56fda60f5b776cb0" - }, - "reason_phrase": "OK", - "status_code": 200 - } - } - ] -} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tests/test_o3_pro_http_recording.py b/tests/test_o3_pro_http_recording.py deleted file mode 100644 index 98b21da..0000000 --- a/tests/test_o3_pro_http_recording.py +++ /dev/null @@ -1,104 +0,0 @@ -""" -Tests for o3-pro output_text parsing fix using HTTP-level recording via respx. - -This test validates the fix using real OpenAI SDK objects by recording/replaying -HTTP responses instead of creating mock objects. -""" - -import os -import unittest -from pathlib import Path - -import pytest -from dotenv import load_dotenv - -from tests.test_helpers.http_recorder import HTTPRecorder -from tools.chat import ChatTool - -# Load environment variables from .env file -load_dotenv() - -# Use absolute path for cassette directory -cassette_dir = Path(__file__).parent / "http_cassettes" -cassette_dir.mkdir(exist_ok=True) - - -@pytest.mark.no_mock_provider # Disable provider mocking for this test -class TestO3ProHTTPRecording(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): - """Test o3-pro response parsing using HTTP-level recording with real SDK objects.""" - - async def test_o3_pro_real_sdk_objects(self): - """Test that o3-pro parsing works with real OpenAI SDK objects from HTTP replay.""" - # Skip if no API key available and cassette doesn't exist - cassette_path = cassette_dir / "o3_pro_real_sdk.json" - if not cassette_path.exists() and not os.getenv("OPENAI_API_KEY"): - pytest.skip("Set real OPENAI_API_KEY to record HTTP cassettes") - - # Use HTTPRecorder to record/replay raw HTTP responses - async with HTTPRecorder(str(cassette_path)): - # Execute the chat tool test - real SDK objects will be created - result = await self._execute_chat_tool_test() - - # Verify the response works correctly with real SDK objects - self._verify_chat_tool_response(result) - - # Verify cassette was created in record mode - if os.getenv("OPENAI_API_KEY") and not os.getenv("OPENAI_API_KEY").startswith("dummy"): - self.assertTrue(cassette_path.exists(), f"HTTP cassette not created at {cassette_path}") - - async def _execute_chat_tool_test(self): - """Execute the ChatTool with o3-pro and return the result.""" - chat_tool = ChatTool() - arguments = {"prompt": "What is 2 + 2?", "model": "o3-pro", "temperature": 1.0} - - return await chat_tool.execute(arguments) - - def _verify_chat_tool_response(self, result): - """Verify the ChatTool response contains expected data.""" - # Verify we got a valid response - self.assertIsNotNone(result, "Should get response from ChatTool") - - # Parse the result content (ChatTool returns MCP TextContent format) - self.assertIsInstance(result, list, "ChatTool should return list of content") - self.assertTrue(len(result) > 0, "Should have at least one content item") - - # Get the text content (result is a list of TextContent objects) - content_item = result[0] - self.assertEqual(content_item.type, "text", "First item should be text content") - - text_content = content_item.text - self.assertTrue(len(text_content) > 0, "Should have text content") - - # Parse the JSON response from chat tool - import json - try: - response_data = json.loads(text_content) - except json.JSONDecodeError: - self.fail(f"Could not parse chat tool response as JSON: {text_content}") - - # Verify the response makes sense for the math question - actual_content = response_data.get("content", "") - self.assertIn("4", actual_content, "Should contain the answer '4'") - - # Verify metadata shows o3-pro was used - metadata = response_data.get("metadata", {}) - self.assertEqual(metadata.get("model_used"), "o3-pro", "Should use o3-pro model") - self.assertEqual(metadata.get("provider_used"), "openai", "Should use OpenAI provider") - - # Additional verification that the fix is working - self.assertTrue(actual_content.strip(), "Content should not be empty") - self.assertIsInstance(actual_content, str, "Content should be string") - - # Verify successful status - self.assertEqual(response_data.get("status"), "continuation_available", "Should have successful status") - - -if __name__ == "__main__": - print("🌐 HTTP-Level Recording Tests for O3-Pro with Real SDK Objects") - print("=" * 60) - print("FIRST RUN: Requires OPENAI_API_KEY - records HTTP responses (EXPENSIVE!)") - print("SUBSEQUENT RUNS: Uses recorded HTTP responses - free and fast") - print("RECORDING: Delete .json files in tests/http_cassettes/ to re-record") - print() - - unittest.main() \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tests/test_o3_pro_output_text_fix.py b/tests/test_o3_pro_output_text_fix.py index 182ebae..f1258eb 100644 --- a/tests/test_o3_pro_output_text_fix.py +++ b/tests/test_o3_pro_output_text_fix.py @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ """ -Tests for o3-pro output_text parsing fix using respx response recording. +Tests for o3-pro output_text parsing fix using HTTP transport recording. This test validates the fix that uses `response.output_text` convenience field instead of manually parsing `response.output.content[].text`. -Uses respx to record real o3-pro API responses at the HTTP level while allowing +Uses HTTP transport recorder to record real o3-pro API responses at the HTTP level while allowing the OpenAI SDK to create real response objects that we can test. RECORDING: To record new responses, delete the cassette file and run with real API keys. diff --git a/tests/test_o3_pro_respx_simple.py b/tests/test_o3_pro_respx_simple.py deleted file mode 100644 index 5e94abd..0000000 --- a/tests/test_o3_pro_respx_simple.py +++ /dev/null @@ -1,104 +0,0 @@ -""" -Tests for o3-pro output_text parsing fix using respx for HTTP recording/replay. - -This test uses respx's built-in recording capabilities to record/replay HTTP responses, -allowing the OpenAI SDK to create real response objects with all convenience methods. -""" - -import os -import unittest -from pathlib import Path - -import pytest -from dotenv import load_dotenv - -from tests.test_helpers.respx_recorder import RespxRecorder -from tools.chat import ChatTool - -# Load environment variables from .env file -load_dotenv() - -# Use absolute path for cassette directory -cassette_dir = Path(__file__).parent / "respx_cassettes" -cassette_dir.mkdir(exist_ok=True) - - -@pytest.mark.no_mock_provider # Disable provider mocking for this test -class TestO3ProRespxSimple(unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase): - """Test o3-pro response parsing using respx for HTTP recording/replay.""" - - async def test_o3_pro_with_respx_recording(self): - """Test o3-pro parsing with respx HTTP recording - real SDK objects.""" - cassette_path = cassette_dir / "o3_pro_respx.json" - - # Skip if no API key available and no cassette exists - if not cassette_path.exists() and (not os.getenv("OPENAI_API_KEY") or os.getenv("OPENAI_API_KEY").startswith("dummy")): - pytest.skip("Set real OPENAI_API_KEY to record HTTP cassettes") - - # Use RespxRecorder for automatic recording/replay - async with RespxRecorder(str(cassette_path)) as recorder: - # Execute the chat tool test - recorder handles recording or replay automatically - result = await self._execute_chat_tool_test() - - # Verify the response works correctly with real SDK objects - self._verify_chat_tool_response(result) - - # Verify cassette was created in record mode - if not os.getenv("OPENAI_API_KEY", "").startswith("dummy"): - self.assertTrue(cassette_path.exists(), f"HTTP cassette not created at {cassette_path}") - - async def _execute_chat_tool_test(self): - """Execute the ChatTool with o3-pro and return the result.""" - chat_tool = ChatTool() - arguments = {"prompt": "What is 2 + 2?", "model": "o3-pro", "temperature": 1.0} - - return await chat_tool.execute(arguments) - - def _verify_chat_tool_response(self, result): - """Verify the ChatTool response contains expected data.""" - # Verify we got a valid response - self.assertIsNotNone(result, "Should get response from ChatTool") - - # Parse the result content (ChatTool returns MCP TextContent format) - self.assertIsInstance(result, list, "ChatTool should return list of content") - self.assertTrue(len(result) > 0, "Should have at least one content item") - - # Get the text content (result is a list of TextContent objects) - content_item = result[0] - self.assertEqual(content_item.type, "text", "First item should be text content") - - text_content = content_item.text - self.assertTrue(len(text_content) > 0, "Should have text content") - - # Parse the JSON response from chat tool - import json - try: - response_data = json.loads(text_content) - except json.JSONDecodeError: - self.fail(f"Could not parse chat tool response as JSON: {text_content}") - - # Verify the response makes sense for the math question - actual_content = response_data.get("content", "") - self.assertIn("4", actual_content, "Should contain the answer '4'") - - # Verify metadata shows o3-pro was used - metadata = response_data.get("metadata", {}) - self.assertEqual(metadata.get("model_used"), "o3-pro", "Should use o3-pro model") - self.assertEqual(metadata.get("provider_used"), "openai", "Should use OpenAI provider") - - # Additional verification - self.assertTrue(actual_content.strip(), "Content should not be empty") - self.assertIsInstance(actual_content, str, "Content should be string") - - # Verify successful status - self.assertEqual(response_data.get("status"), "continuation_available", "Should have successful status") - - -if __name__ == "__main__": - print("🔥 Respx HTTP Recording Tests for O3-Pro with Real SDK Objects") - print("=" * 60) - print("This tests the concept of using respx for HTTP-level recording") - print("Currently using pass_through mode to validate the approach") - print() - - unittest.main() \ No newline at end of file