Add Consensus Tool for Multi-Model Perspective Gathering (#67)

* WIP
Refactor resolving mode_names, should be done once at MCP call boundary
Pass around model context instead
Consensus tool allows one to get a consensus from multiple models, optionally assigning one a 'for' or 'against' stance to find nuanced responses.

* Deduplication of model resolution, model_context should be available before reaching deeper parts of the code
Improved abstraction when building conversations
Throw programmer errors early

* Guardrails
Support for `model:option` format at MCP boundary so future tools can use additional options if needed instead of handling this only for consensus
Model name now supports an optional ":option" for future use

* Simplified async flow

* Improved model for request to support natural language
Simplified async flow

* Improved model for request to support natural language
Simplified async flow

* Fix consensus tool async/sync patterns to match codebase standards

CRITICAL FIXES:
- Converted _get_consensus_responses from async to sync (matches other tools)
- Converted store_conversation_turn from async to sync (add_turn is synchronous)
- Removed unnecessary asyncio imports and sleep calls
- Fixed ClosedResourceError in MCP protocol during long consensus operations

PATTERN ALIGNMENT:
- Consensus tool now follows same sync patterns as all other tools
- Only execute() and prepare_prompt() are async (base class requirement)
- All internal operations are synchronous like analyze, chat, debug, etc.

TESTING:
- MCP simulation test now passes: consensus_stance ✅
- Two-model consensus works correctly in ~35 seconds
- Unknown stance handling defaults to neutral with warnings
- All 9 unit tests pass (100% success rate)

The consensus tool async patterns were anomalous in the codebase.
This fix aligns it with the established synchronous patterns used
by all other tools while maintaining full functionality.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Fixed call order and added new test

* Cleanup dead comments
Docs for the new tool
Improved tests

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

tools/codereview.py

@@ -227,13 +227,7 @@ class CodeReviewTool(BaseTool):
         if updated_files is not None:
             request.files = updated_files
 
-        # MCP boundary check - STRICT REJECTION
-        if request.files:
-            file_size_check = self.check_total_file_size(request.files)
-            if file_size_check:
-                from tools.models import ToolOutput
-
-                raise ValueError(f"MCP_SIZE_CHECK:{ToolOutput(**file_size_check).model_dump_json()}")
+        # File size validation happens at MCP boundary in server.py
 
         # Check user input size at MCP transport boundary (before adding internal content)
         user_content = request.prompt