torbjorn/my-pal-mcp-server
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

nailedit confidence - no need to waste tokens on another assistant when it's a no brainer fix for Claude

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Fahad
2025-06-19 13:52:37 +04:00
parent 4394ca1061
commit 91acc0bd26
1 changed files with 70 additions and 34 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

44
tools/debug.py
View File

@@ -50,7 +50,14 @@ DEBUG_INVESTIGATION_FIELD_DESCRIPTIONS = {
"hypothesis": (
"Formulate your current best guess about the underlying cause. This is a working theory and may evolve based on further evidence."
),
"confidence": "How confident you are in the current hypothesis: 'low', 'medium', or 'high'.",
"confidence": (
"How confident you are in the current hypothesis: "
"'low' (initial theory), 'medium' (good evidence), 'high' (strong to very strong evidence), "
"'nailedit' (ONLY use for final step and ONLY when you have found the EXACT root cause with 100% certainty AND "
"identified a simple, minimal fix that requires no expert consultation. Use this ONLY "
"for obvious bugs and logic errors that you ABSOLUTELY are certain about and have no doubts because you have"
"successfully mapped out the code flow and the root cause behind the issue."
),
"backtrack_from_step": "If a previous step needs revision, specify the step number to backtrack from.",
"continuation_id": "Continuation token used for linking multi-step investigations and continuing conversations after discovery.",
"images": (
@@ -197,7 +204,7 @@ class DebugIssueTool(BaseTool):
},
"confidence": {
"type": "string",
"enum": ["low", "medium", "high"],
"enum": ["low", "medium", "high", "nailedit"],
"description": DEBUG_INVESTIGATION_FIELD_DESCRIPTIONS["confidence"],
},
"backtrack_from_step": {
@@ -344,11 +351,40 @@ class DebugIssueTool(BaseTool):
if continuation_id:
response_data["continuation_id"] = continuation_id
# If investigation is complete, call the AI model for expert analysis
# If investigation is complete, decide whether to call expert analysis or proceed with minimal fix
if not request.next_step_required:
response_data["status"] = "calling_expert_analysis"
response_data["investigation_complete"] = True
# Check if Claude has absolute certainty and can proceed with minimal fix
if request.confidence == "nailedit":
# Trust Claude's judgment completely - if it says nailedit, skip expert analysis
response_data["status"] = "nailedit_confidence_proceed_with_fix"
investigation_summary = self._prepare_investigation_summary()
response_data["complete_investigation"] = {
"initial_issue": getattr(self, "initial_issue", request.step),
"steps_taken": len(self.investigation_history),
"files_examined": list(self.consolidated_findings["files_checked"]),
"relevant_files": list(self.consolidated_findings["relevant_files"]),
"relevant_methods": list(self.consolidated_findings["relevant_methods"]),
"investigation_summary": investigation_summary,
"final_hypothesis": request.hypothesis,
"confidence_level": "nailedit",
}
response_data["next_steps"] = (
"Investigation complete with NAILED-IT confidence. You have identified the exact "
"root cause and a minimal fix. Proceed directly with implementing the simple fix "
"without requiring expert consultation. Focus on the precise, minimal change needed."
)
response_data["skip_expert_analysis"] = True
response_data["expert_analysis"] = {
"status": "skipped_due_to_nailedit_confidence",
"reason": "Claude identified exact root cause with minimal fix requirement",
}
else:
# Standard expert analysis for high/medium/low confidence
response_data["status"] = "calling_expert_analysis"
# Prepare consolidated investigation summary
investigation_summary = self._prepare_investigation_summary()