Make code lookup mandatory in between investigation steps for better results
This commit is contained in:
Fahad
@@ -157,16 +157,18 @@ class DebugIssueTool(BaseTool):
|
||||
"DEBUG & ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS - Systematic self-investigation followed by expert analysis. "
|
||||
"This tool guides you through a step-by-step investigation process where you:\n\n"
|
||||
"1. Start with step 1: describe the issue to investigate\n"
|
||||
"2. Continue with investigation steps: examine code, trace errors, test hypotheses\n"
|
||||
"3. Track findings, relevant files, and methods throughout\n"
|
||||
"4. Update hypotheses as understanding evolves\n"
|
||||
"5. Backtrack and revise findings when needed\n"
|
||||
"6. Once investigation is complete, receive expert analysis\n\n"
|
||||
"The tool enforces systematic investigation methodology:\n"
|
||||
"- Methodical code examination and evidence collection\n"
|
||||
"- Hypothesis formation and validation\n"
|
||||
"- File and method tracking for context\n"
|
||||
"- Confidence assessment and revision capabilities\n\n"
|
||||
"2. STOP and investigate using appropriate tools\n"
|
||||
"3. Report findings in step 2 with concrete evidence from actual code\n"
|
||||
"4. Continue investigating between each debug step\n"
|
||||
"5. Track findings, relevant files, and methods throughout\n"
|
||||
"6. Update hypotheses as understanding evolves\n"
|
||||
"7. Once investigation is complete, receive expert analysis\n\n"
|
||||
"IMPORTANT: This tool enforces investigation between steps:\n"
|
||||
"- After each debug call, you MUST investigate before calling debug again\n"
|
||||
"- Each step must include NEW evidence from code examination\n"
|
||||
"- No recursive debug calls without actual investigation work\n"
|
||||
"- The tool will specify which step number to use next\n"
|
||||
"- Follow the required_actions list for investigation guidance\n\n"
|
||||
"Perfect for: complex bugs, mysterious errors, performance issues, "
|
||||
"race conditions, memory leaks, integration problems."
|
||||
)
|
||||
@@ -357,10 +359,6 @@ class DebugIssueTool(BaseTool):
|
||||
"images_collected": len(set(self.consolidated_findings["images"])),
|
||||
"current_confidence": request.confidence,
|
||||
},
|
||||
"output": {
|
||||
"instructions": "Continue systematic investigation. Present findings clearly and proceed to next step if required.",
|
||||
"format": "systematic_investigation",
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if continuation_id:
|
||||
@@ -436,10 +434,72 @@ class DebugIssueTool(BaseTool):
|
||||
"the problem lies."
|
||||
)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
response_data["next_steps"] = (
|
||||
f"Continue investigation with step {request.step_number + 1}. "
|
||||
f"Focus on: examining relevant code, testing hypotheses, gathering evidence."
|
||||
)
|
||||
# CRITICAL: Force Claude to actually investigate before calling debug again
|
||||
response_data["status"] = "pause_for_investigation"
|
||||
response_data["investigation_required"] = True
|
||||
|
||||
if request.step_number == 1:
|
||||
# Initial investigation tasks
|
||||
response_data["required_actions"] = [
|
||||
"Search for code related to the reported issue or symptoms",
|
||||
"Examine relevant files and understand the current implementation",
|
||||
"Understand the project structure and locate relevant modules",
|
||||
"Identify how the affected functionality is supposed to work",
|
||||
]
|
||||
response_data["next_steps"] = (
|
||||
f"MANDATORY: DO NOT call the debug tool again immediately. You MUST first investigate "
|
||||
f"the codebase using appropriate tools. Search for relevant code, examine implementations, "
|
||||
f"understand the logic flow. Only call debug again AFTER you have gathered concrete evidence "
|
||||
f"and examined actual code. When you call debug next time, use step_number: {request.step_number + 1} "
|
||||
f"and report the specific files you've examined and findings you've discovered."
|
||||
)
|
||||
elif request.step_number >= 2 and request.confidence in ["exploring", "low"]:
|
||||
# Need deeper investigation
|
||||
response_data["required_actions"] = [
|
||||
"Examine the specific files you've identified as relevant",
|
||||
"Trace method calls and data flow through the system",
|
||||
"Check for edge cases, boundary conditions, and assumptions in the code",
|
||||
"Look for related configuration, dependencies, or external factors",
|
||||
]
|
||||
response_data["next_steps"] = (
|
||||
f"STOP! Do NOT call debug again yet. Based on your findings, you've identified potential areas "
|
||||
f"but need concrete evidence. MANDATORY ACTIONS before calling debug step {request.step_number + 1}:\n"
|
||||
f"1. Examine ALL files in your relevant_files list\n"
|
||||
f"2. Trace how data flows through {', '.join(request.relevant_methods[:3]) if request.relevant_methods else 'the identified components'}\n"
|
||||
f"3. Look for logic errors, incorrect assumptions, missing validations\n"
|
||||
f"4. Check interactions between components and external dependencies\n"
|
||||
f"Only call debug again with step_number: {request.step_number + 1} AFTER completing these investigations."
|
||||
)
|
||||
elif request.confidence in ["medium", "high"]:
|
||||
# Close to root cause - need confirmation
|
||||
response_data["required_actions"] = [
|
||||
"Examine the exact code sections where you believe the issue occurs",
|
||||
"Trace the execution path that leads to the failure",
|
||||
"Verify your hypothesis with concrete code evidence",
|
||||
"Check for any similar patterns elsewhere in the codebase",
|
||||
]
|
||||
response_data["next_steps"] = (
|
||||
f"WAIT! Your hypothesis needs verification. DO NOT call debug immediately. REQUIRED ACTIONS:\n"
|
||||
f"1. Examine the exact lines where the issue occurs\n"
|
||||
f"2. Trace backwards: how does data get to this point? What transforms it?\n"
|
||||
f"3. Check all assumptions: are inputs validated? Are nulls handled?\n"
|
||||
f"4. Look for the EXACT line where expected != actual behavior\n"
|
||||
f"Document these findings with specific file:line references, then call debug with step_number: {request.step_number + 1}."
|
||||
)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
# General investigation needed
|
||||
response_data["required_actions"] = [
|
||||
"Continue examining the code paths identified in your hypothesis",
|
||||
"Gather more evidence using appropriate investigation tools",
|
||||
"Test edge cases and boundary conditions",
|
||||
"Look for patterns that confirm or refute your theory",
|
||||
]
|
||||
response_data["next_steps"] = (
|
||||
f"PAUSE INVESTIGATION. Before calling debug step {request.step_number + 1}, you MUST examine code. "
|
||||
f"Required: Read files from your files_checked list, search for patterns in your hypothesis, "
|
||||
f"trace execution flow. Your next debug call (step_number: {request.step_number + 1}) must include "
|
||||
f"NEW evidence from actual code examination, not just theories. NO recursive debug calls without investigation work!"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Store in conversation memory
|
||||
if continuation_id:
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user