Simplified thread continuations
Fixed and improved tests
This commit is contained in:
14
README.md
14
README.md
@@ -503,6 +503,8 @@ To help choose the right tool for your needs:
|
||||
|
||||
### Thinking Modes & Token Budgets
|
||||
|
||||
These only apply to models that support customizing token usage for extended thinking, such as Gemini 2.5 Pro.
|
||||
|
||||
| Mode | Token Budget | Use Case | Cost Impact |
|
||||
|------|-------------|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `minimal` | 128 tokens | Simple, straightforward tasks | Lowest cost |
|
||||
@@ -540,17 +542,17 @@ To help choose the right tool for your needs:
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples by scenario:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
# Quick style check
|
||||
"Use o3 to review formatting in utils.py with minimal thinking"
|
||||
# Quick style check with o3
|
||||
"Use flash to review formatting in utils.py"
|
||||
|
||||
# Security audit
|
||||
# Security audit with o3
|
||||
"Get o3 to do a security review of auth/ with thinking mode high"
|
||||
|
||||
# Complex debugging
|
||||
# Complex debugging, letting claude pick the best model
|
||||
"Use zen to debug this race condition with max thinking mode"
|
||||
|
||||
# Architecture analysis
|
||||
"Analyze the entire src/ directory architecture with high thinking using zen"
|
||||
# Architecture analysis with Gemini 2.5 Pro
|
||||
"Analyze the entire src/ directory architecture with high thinking using pro"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Advanced Features
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user