torbjorn/my-pal-mcp-server
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat: added intelligence_score to the model capabilities schema; a 1-20 number that can be specified to influence the sort order of models presented to the CLI in auto selection mode

Browse Source 
fix: model definition re-introduced into the schema but intelligently and only a summary is generated per tool. Required to ensure CLI calls and uses the correct model
fix: removed `model` param from some tools where this wasn't needed
fix: fixed adherence to `*_ALLOWED_MODELS` by advertising only the allowed models to the CLI
fix: removed duplicates across providers when passing canonical names back to the CLI; the first enabled provider wins
This commit is contained in:
Fahad
2025-10-02 21:43:44 +04:00
parent e78fe35a1b
commit 6cab9e56fc
22 changed files with 525 additions and 110 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

25
tools/consensus.py
View File

@@ -48,8 +48,9 @@ CONSENSUS_WORKFLOW_FIELD_DESCRIPTIONS = {
),
"relevant_files": "Optional supporting files that help the consensus analysis. Must be absolute full, non-abbreviated paths.",
"models": (
"List of models to consult. Each entry may include model, stance (for/against/neutral), and stance_prompt. "
"Each (model, stance) pair must be unique, e.g. [{'model':'o3','stance':'for'}, {'model':'o3','stance':'against'}]."
"User-specified list of models to consult (provide at least two entries). "
"Each entry may include model, stance (for/against/neutral), and stance_prompt. "
"Each (model, stance) pair must be unique, e.g. [{'model':'gpt5','stance':'for'}, {'model':'pro','stance':'against'}]."
),
"current_model_index": "0-based index of the next model to consult (managed internally).",
"model_responses": "Internal log of responses gathered so far.",
@@ -233,7 +234,11 @@ of the evidence, even when it strongly points in one direction.""",
},
"required": ["model"],
},
"description": CONSENSUS_WORKFLOW_FIELD_DESCRIPTIONS["models"],
"description": (
"User-specified roster of models to consult (provide at least two entries). "
+ CONSENSUS_WORKFLOW_FIELD_DESCRIPTIONS["models"]
),
"minItems": 2,
},
"current_model_index": {
"type": "integer",
@@ -268,17 +273,19 @@ of the evidence, even when it strongly points in one direction.""",
"thinking_mode", # Not used in consensus workflow
]
# Build schema with proper field exclusion
# Include model field for compatibility but don't require it
schema = WorkflowSchemaBuilder.build_schema(
requires_model = self.requires_model()
model_field_schema = self.get_model_field_schema() if requires_model else None
auto_mode = self.is_effective_auto_mode() if requires_model else False
return WorkflowSchemaBuilder.build_schema(
tool_specific_fields=consensus_field_overrides,
model_field_schema=self.get_model_field_schema(),
auto_mode=False, # Consensus doesn't require model at MCP boundary
model_field_schema=model_field_schema,
auto_mode=auto_mode,
tool_name=self.get_name(),
excluded_workflow_fields=excluded_workflow_fields,
excluded_common_fields=excluded_common_fields,
require_model=requires_model,
)
return schema
def get_required_actions(
self, step_number: int, confidence: str, findings: str, total_steps: int, request=None