torbjorn/my-pal-mcp-server
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

🚀 Major Enhancement: Workflow-Based Tool Architecture v5.5.0 (#95)

Browse Source 
* WIP: new workflow architecture

* WIP: further improvements and cleanup

* WIP: cleanup and docks, replace old tool with new

* WIP: cleanup and docks, replace old tool with new

* WIP: new planner implementation using workflow

* WIP: precommit tool working as a workflow instead of a basic tool
Support for passing False to use_assistant_model to skip external models completely and use Claude only

* WIP: precommit workflow version swapped with old

* WIP: codereview

* WIP: replaced codereview

* WIP: replaced codereview

* WIP: replaced refactor

* WIP: workflow for thinkdeep

* WIP: ensure files get embedded correctly

* WIP: thinkdeep replaced with workflow version

* WIP: improved messaging when an external model's response is received

* WIP: analyze tool swapped

* WIP: updated tests
* Extract only the content when building history
* Use "relevant_files" for workflow tools only

* WIP: updated tests
* Extract only the content when building history
* Use "relevant_files" for workflow tools only

* WIP: fixed get_completion_next_steps_message missing param

* Fixed tests
Request for files consistently

* Fixed tests
Request for files consistently

* Fixed tests

* New testgen workflow tool
Updated docs

* Swap testgen workflow

* Fix CI test failures by excluding API-dependent tests

- Update GitHub Actions workflow to exclude simulation tests that require API keys
- Fix collaboration tests to properly mock workflow tool expert analysis calls
- Update test assertions to handle new workflow tool response format
- Ensure unit tests run without external API dependencies in CI

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* WIP - Update tests to match new tools

* WIP - Update tests to match new tools

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Beehive Innovations
2025-06-21 00:08:11 +04:00
committed by GitHub
parent 4dae6e457e
commit 69a3121452
76 changed files with 17111 additions and 7725 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

30
simulator_tests/test_per_tool_deduplication.py
View File

@@ -60,14 +60,18 @@ def divide(x, y):
# Step 1: precommit tool with dummy file (low thinking mode)
self.logger.info(" Step 1: precommit tool with dummy file")
precommit_params = {
"step": "Initial analysis of dummy_code.py for commit readiness. Please give me a quick one line reply.",
"step_number": 1,
"total_steps": 2,
"next_step_required": True,
"findings": "Starting pre-commit validation of dummy_code.py",
"path": os.getcwd(), # Use current working directory as the git repo path
"files": [dummy_file_path],
"prompt": "Please give me a quick one line reply. Review this code for commit readiness",
"relevant_files": [dummy_file_path],
"thinking_mode": "low",
"model": "flash",
}
response1, continuation_id = self.call_mcp_tool_direct("precommit", precommit_params)
response1, continuation_id = self.call_mcp_tool("precommit", precommit_params)
if not response1:
self.logger.error(" ❌ Step 1: precommit tool failed")
return False
@@ -86,13 +90,17 @@ def divide(x, y):
# Step 2: codereview tool with same file (NO continuation - fresh conversation)
self.logger.info(" Step 2: codereview tool with same file (fresh conversation)")
codereview_params = {
"files": [dummy_file_path],
"prompt": "Please give me a quick one line reply. General code review for quality and best practices",
"step": "Initial code review of dummy_code.py for quality and best practices. Please give me a quick one line reply.",
"step_number": 1,
"total_steps": 1,
"next_step_required": False,
"findings": "Starting code review of dummy_code.py",
"relevant_files": [dummy_file_path],
"thinking_mode": "low",
"model": "flash",
}
response2, _ = self.call_mcp_tool_direct("codereview", codereview_params)
response2, _ = self.call_mcp_tool("codereview", codereview_params)
if not response2:
self.logger.error(" ❌ Step 2: codereview tool failed")
return False
@@ -115,14 +123,18 @@ def subtract(a, b):
# Continue precommit with both files
continue_params = {
"continuation_id": continuation_id,
"step": "Continue analysis with new_feature.py added. Please give me a quick one line reply about both files.",
"step_number": 2,
"total_steps": 2,
"next_step_required": False,
"findings": "Continuing pre-commit validation with both dummy_code.py and new_feature.py",
"path": os.getcwd(), # Use current working directory as the git repo path
"files": [dummy_file_path, new_file_path], # Old + new file
"prompt": "Please give me a quick one line reply. Now also review the new feature file along with the previous one",
"relevant_files": [dummy_file_path, new_file_path], # Old + new file
"thinking_mode": "low",
"model": "flash",
}
response3, _ = self.call_mcp_tool_direct("precommit", continue_params)
response3, _ = self.call_mcp_tool("precommit", continue_params)
if not response3:
self.logger.error(" ❌ Step 3: precommit continuation failed")
return False