refactor: rename review tools for clarity and consistency
- Renamed `review_code` tool to `codereview` for better naming convention - Renamed `review_changes` tool to `precommit` to better reflect its purpose - Updated all tool descriptions to remove "Triggers:" sections and improve clarity - Updated all imports and references throughout the codebase - Renamed test files to match new tool names - Updated server.py tool registrations - All existing functionality preserved with improved naming This refactoring improves code organization and makes tool purposes clearer. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -39,9 +39,8 @@ class ThinkDeeperTool(BaseTool):
|
||||
def get_description(self) -> str:
|
||||
return (
|
||||
"EXTENDED THINKING & REASONING - Your deep thinking partner for complex problems. "
|
||||
"Use this when you need to extend your analysis, explore alternatives, or validate approaches. "
|
||||
"Use this when you need to think deeper about a problem, extend your analysis, explore alternatives, or validate approaches. "
|
||||
"Perfect for: architecture decisions, complex bugs, performance challenges, security analysis. "
|
||||
"Triggers: 'think deeper', 'ultrathink', 'extend my analysis', 'explore alternatives'. "
|
||||
"I'll challenge assumptions, find edge cases, and provide alternative solutions. "
|
||||
"IMPORTANT: Choose the appropriate thinking_mode based on task complexity - "
|
||||
"'low' for quick analysis, 'medium' for standard problems, 'high' for complex issues (default), "
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user