Precommit updated to take always prefer external analysis (via _other_ model) unless specified not to. This prevents Claude from being overconfident and inadequately performing subpar precommit checks.

This commit is contained in:
Fahad
2025-08-20 11:55:40 +04:00
parent 00f944e6f9
commit 0af9202012
5 changed files with 160 additions and 147 deletions

View File

@@ -225,8 +225,8 @@ REQUIREMENTS:
{"severity": "high", "description": "Password hash exposed in API response"},
{"severity": "medium", "description": "Missing authentication on admin endpoint"},
],
"assessment": "Multiple critical security vulnerabilities found requiring immediate fixes",
"confidence": "high",
# Assessment field removed - using precommit_type instead
# Confidence field removed - using precommit_type instead
"continuation_id": continuation_id,
},
)
@@ -249,8 +249,8 @@ REQUIREMENTS:
self.logger.error("Issues found not properly tracked")
return False
if validation_status.get("assessment_confidence") != "high":
self.logger.error("Confidence level not properly tracked")
if validation_status.get("precommit_type") != "external":
self.logger.error("Precommit type not properly tracked")
return False
self.logger.info(" ✅ Step 2 successful with proper tracking")
@@ -300,8 +300,7 @@ REQUIREMENTS:
"findings": "Connection pool configuration seems reasonable, might be looking in wrong place",
"files_checked": ["/db/connection.py", "/config/database.py"],
"relevant_files": [],
"assessment": "Database configuration appears correct",
"confidence": "low",
# Assessment fields removed - using precommit_type instead
"continuation_id": continuation_id,
},
)
@@ -326,8 +325,7 @@ REQUIREMENTS:
"issues_found": [
{"severity": "medium", "description": "N+1 query pattern in user profile loading"}
],
"assessment": "Query pattern optimization needed for performance",
"confidence": "medium",
# Assessment fields removed - using precommit_type instead
"backtrack_from_step": 2, # Backtrack from step 2
"continuation_id": continuation_id,
},
@@ -397,7 +395,7 @@ REQUIREMENTS:
{"severity": "medium", "description": "Missing authentication on admin endpoint"},
{"severity": "medium", "description": "Debug mode enabled in production configuration"},
],
"confidence": "high",
# Confidence field removed - using precommit_type instead
"continuation_id": continuation_id,
"model": "flash", # Use flash for expert analysis
},
@@ -490,8 +488,7 @@ REQUIREMENTS:
{"severity": "high", "description": "Hardcoded secret - use environment variables"},
{"severity": "medium", "description": "Missing authentication - add middleware"},
],
"assessment": "Critical security vulnerabilities identified with clear fixes - changes must not be committed until resolved",
"confidence": "certain", # This should skip expert analysis
"precommit_type": "internal", # This should skip expert analysis
"path": self.test_dir,
"model": "flash",
},
@@ -517,7 +514,7 @@ REQUIREMENTS:
return False
expert_analysis = response_certain_data.get("expert_analysis", {})
if expert_analysis.get("status") != "skipped_due_to_certain_validation_confidence":
if expert_analysis.get("status") != "skipped_due_to_internal_analysis_type":
self.logger.error("Expert analysis should be skipped for certain confidence")
return False
@@ -680,8 +677,7 @@ def rate_limiting_middleware(app):
"files_checked": [auth_file, middleware_file],
"relevant_files": [auth_file], # This should be referenced, not embedded
"relevant_context": ["require_auth"],
"assessment": "Investigating security implementation",
"confidence": "low",
# Assessment fields removed - using precommit_type instead
"path": self.test_dir,
"model": "flash",
},
@@ -724,8 +720,7 @@ def rate_limiting_middleware(app):
"issues_found": [
{"severity": "medium", "description": "Basic token validation might be insufficient"}
],
"assessment": "Security implementation needs improvement",
"confidence": "medium",
# Assessment fields removed - using precommit_type instead
"model": "flash",
},
)
@@ -775,8 +770,8 @@ def rate_limiting_middleware(app):
{"severity": "low", "description": "Missing CSRF protection"},
{"severity": "low", "description": "Rate limiting not implemented"},
],
"assessment": "Security implementation needs improvements but is acceptable for commit with follow-up tasks",
"confidence": "high",
# Assessment field removed - using precommit_type instead
# Confidence field removed - using precommit_type instead
"model": "flash",
},
)
@@ -915,8 +910,7 @@ if __name__ == '__main__':
"files_checked": [db_file],
"relevant_files": [db_file],
"relevant_context": [],
"assessment": "Examining database implementation for best practices",
"confidence": "low",
# Assessment fields removed - using precommit_type instead
"path": self.test_dir,
"model": "flash",
},
@@ -950,8 +944,7 @@ if __name__ == '__main__':
"files_checked": [db_file, test_file],
"relevant_files": [db_file, test_file],
"relevant_context": ["DatabaseManager.create_user", "TestDatabaseManager.test_create_user"],
"assessment": "Implementation looks solid with proper testing",
"confidence": "medium",
# Assessment fields removed - using precommit_type instead
"model": "flash",
},
)
@@ -991,8 +984,8 @@ if __name__ == '__main__':
"relevant_files": [db_file, test_file],
"relevant_context": ["DatabaseManager.get_connection", "DatabaseManager.create_user"],
"issues_found": [], # No issues found
"assessment": "High quality implementation with proper security measures and testing",
"confidence": "high",
# Assessment field removed - using precommit_type instead
# Confidence field removed - using precommit_type instead
"model": "flash",
},
)
@@ -1026,8 +1019,8 @@ if __name__ == '__main__':
"relevant_files": [db_file, test_file],
"relevant_context": ["DatabaseManager", "TestDatabaseManager"],
"issues_found": [],
"assessment": "Code meets all security and quality standards - approved for commit",
"confidence": "high",
# Assessment field removed - using precommit_type instead
# Confidence field removed - using precommit_type instead
"model": "flash",
},
)