diff --git a/.claude/skills/SKILL.md b/.claude/skills/SKILL.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7bd2dd3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.claude/skills/SKILL.md
@@ -0,0 +1,893 @@
+---
+name: norwegian-legal-research
+description: Use when researching Norwegian legal questions, laws, regulations, or legal concepts to ensure proper Lovdata citations and accurate Norwegian legal explanations
+---
+
+# Norwegian Legal Research
+
+## Overview
+
+Guide AI agents in conducting proper Norwegian legal research using Lovdata.no sources, providing accurate citations, and explaining legal concepts in appropriate Norwegian contexts.
+
+**Core principles:**
+- Always cite specific Lovdata URLs with amendment dates
+- Explain legal concepts in clear Norwegian
+- Distinguish between laws (lover) and regulations (forskrifter)
+- Consider hierarchical legal structure and cross-references
+
+**Announce at start:** "I'm using the norwegian-legal-research skill to ensure proper legal research methodology."
+
+## Citation Standards
+
+## Citation Standards
+
+### Lovdata URL Citations
+**REQUIRED FORMAT:**
+```
+https://lovdata.no/lov/[YEAR]/[NUMBER]/[SECTION]
+https://lovdata.no/forskrift/[YEAR]/[NUMBER]/[SECTION]
+```
+
+**Complete Citation Structure:**
+```
+[Law/Regulation Name] ([Short Form] [Date]), [Section Reference]
+[Full Lovdata URL]
+```
+
+**Examples by Document Type:**
+
+**Laws (Lover):**
+- `https://lovdata.no/lov/1999-07-16-65/§8` - Health Personnel Act §8
+- `https://lovdata.no/lov/2005-06-17-64/§2-1` - Working Environment Act §2-1
+- `https://lovdata.no/lov/2018-06-15-38/§13` - Personal Data Act §13
+
+**Regulations (Forskrifter):**
+- `https://lovdata.no/forskrift/2021-12-15-1234/§5` - GDPR Implementation Regulation §5
+- `https://lovdata.no/forskrift/2019-12-20-2358/§12` - Accounting Regulation §12
+
+**Gazette Provisions (Lovtidend):**
+- `https://lovdata.no/lti/lov/2024-01-15-123/§3` - Gazette law provision
+
+### Amendment References
+**Include amendment dates and sources:**
+
+**Single Amendment:**
+- "According to §8 of the Health Personnel Act (lov 1999-07-16-65), as amended by law 2023-06-16-50..."
+
+**Multiple Amendments:**
+- "Pursuant to §2-1 of the Working Environment Act (lov 2005-06-17-64), with amendments through laws 2018-12-14-126 and 2022-03-18-11..."
+
+**Transitional Provisions:**
+- "Section 13 of the Personal Data Act (lov 2018-06-15-38) applies from 1 July 2023, with transitional provisions in §27..."
+
+**Amendment History:**
+- Always check Lovdata for complete amendment history
+- Note effective dates of changes
+- Reference the amending law numbers
+
+### Cross-References
+**Cite related provisions with context:**
+
+**Hierarchical References:**
+- "See Chapter 2 of the Health Personnel Act for qualification requirements"
+- "Compare with §4 of the Patients' Rights Act (lov 1999-07-16-63)"
+
+**Related Legislation:**
+- "This provision cross-references §13 of the Personal Data Act"
+- "See also regulation 2021-12-15-1234 §5 for implementation details"
+
+**Case Law References:**
+- "As interpreted by the Supreme Court in Rt-2023-1234"
+- "See EFTA Court case E-1/23 for EU law interpretation"
+
+### Citation Validation
+**Before finalizing citations:**
+
+**URL Verification:**
+- Ensure all Lovdata URLs are accessible and current
+- Check that section references exist in the cited version
+- Verify amendment dates match the document
+
+**Amendment Accuracy:**
+- Confirm amending law numbers are correct
+- Validate effective dates of amendments
+- Check for any subsequent amendments
+
+**Cross-Reference Integrity:**
+- Verify referenced provisions exist
+- Ensure hierarchical relationships are accurate
+- Confirm amendment status of cross-referenced sections
+
+### Common Citation Errors
+**AVOID these mistakes:**
+
+❌ **Missing Amendment Dates:**
+- Wrong: "According to §8 of the Health Personnel Act..."
+- Right: "According to §8 of the Health Personnel Act (lov 1999-07-16-65), as amended by law 2023-06-16-50..."
+
+❌ **Incorrect URL Format:**
+- Wrong: `https://lovdata.no/lov/1999/65/§8`
+- Right: `https://lovdata.no/lov/1999-07-16-65/§8`
+
+❌ **Outdated Citations:**
+- Always verify current amendment status
+- Check for newer versions of regulations
+
+❌ **Incomplete Cross-References:**
+- Include both the referenced provision and its relationship
+- Note any conditions or limitations
+
+### Citation Examples
+**Complete Citation Patterns:**
+
+**Basic Law Citation:**
+```
+Health Personnel Act §8 (lov 1999-07-16-65)
+https://lovdata.no/lov/1999-07-16-65/§8
+```
+
+**Amended Regulation:**
+```
+GDPR Implementation Regulation §5 (forskrift 2021-12-15-1234),
+as amended by regulation 2023-06-23-789
+https://lovdata.no/forskrift/2021-12-15-1234/§5
+```
+
+**Cross-Referenced Provisions:**
+```
+Working Environment Act §2-1 (lov 2005-06-17-64), see also
+Chapter 2 for detailed qualification requirements
+https://lovdata.no/lov/2005-06-17-64/§2-1
+```
+
+## Research Methodology
+## Research Methodology
+
+### Initial Assessment
+**Determine research scope and approach:**
+
+**Question Analysis:**
+- Identify the legal domain (health, employment, data protection, etc.)
+- Determine if primary legislation or secondary regulations are needed
+- Assess whether case law or administrative interpretations are relevant
+- Consider regional variations (mainland Norway vs territories)
+
+**Source Prioritization:**
+1. **Constitution (Grunnloven)** - For fundamental rights questions
+2. **Primary Legislation (Lover)** - Main legal framework
+3. **Secondary Legislation (Forskrifter)** - Implementation details
+4. **Case Law (Domstol)** - Judicial interpretations
+5. **Administrative Guidance** - Agency interpretations
+
+### Source Selection Strategy
+**Laws vs Regulations Decision Tree:**
+
+**Use Laws (Lover) when:**
+- Establishing fundamental legal principles
+- Constitutional rights are involved
+- Primary legal obligations need definition
+- Framework legislation is required
+
+**Use Regulations (Forskrifter) when:**
+- Implementation details are needed
+- Technical specifications are required
+- Administrative procedures are involved
+- Sector-specific rules apply
+
+**Search Both Sources when:**
+- Uncertain about legal basis
+- Comprehensive analysis required
+- Implementation details may affect interpretation
+- Cross-domain issues (e.g., health + data protection)
+
+### Hierarchical Navigation
+**Understanding Norwegian Legal Structure:**
+
+**Constitutional Level:**
+- **Grunnloven (Constitution)** - Supreme law, fundamental rights
+- **Menneskerettighetsloven** - Human rights implementation
+
+**Primary Legislation:**
+- **Lover (Acts)** - Framework laws passed by Stortinget
+- Organized by subject areas (health, employment, environment, etc.)
+- Numbered sequentially by year (e.g., 1999-07-16-65)
+
+**Secondary Legislation:**
+- **Forskrifter (Regulations)** - Issued by ministries or agencies
+- Implement and detail primary legislation
+- Include technical standards and administrative procedures
+
+**Case Law and Interpretations:**
+- **Høyesterett (Supreme Court)** - Rt-series citations
+- **Lagmannsrett (Court of Appeal)** - Regional interpretations
+- **Tingrett (District Court)** - First instance decisions
+
+### Amendment Tracking Process
+**Systematic amendment verification:**
+
+**Current Status Check:**
+- Access Lovdata.no for each relevant provision
+- Review "Endringer" (Changes) section for amendment history
+- Note effective dates and amending law numbers
+
+**Amendment Impact Assessment:**
+- Determine if amendments change substantive rights/obligations
+- Check for transitional provisions
+- Assess whether amendments affect interpretation of related provisions
+
+**Temporal Considerations:**
+- Note when provisions came into force
+- Check for sunset clauses or review dates
+- Consider pending legislative changes
+
+### Research Workflows
+**Structured research approaches:**
+
+**Basic Legal Research:**
+1. Identify relevant legal domain
+2. Search primary legislation first
+3. Check for implementing regulations
+4. Verify current amendment status
+5. Note cross-references to related provisions
+
+**Complex Multi-Domain Research:**
+1. Map all potentially relevant legal areas
+2. Prioritize sources by legal hierarchy
+3. Search systematically through each domain
+4. Identify and resolve conflicts between provisions
+5. Document comprehensive amendment history
+
+**Amendment Impact Analysis:**
+1. Establish baseline (original provision)
+2. Track each amendment chronologically
+3. Assess cumulative impact of changes
+4. Identify any transitional provisions
+5. Note effective dates and implementation requirements
+
+### Search Strategy Optimization
+**Effective information retrieval:**
+
+**Keyword Selection:**
+- Use Norwegian legal terminology
+- Include both formal and common terms
+- Consider synonyms and related concepts
+- Search in both Norwegian and relevant English terms
+
+**Boolean Search Techniques:**
+- Use AND for combining concepts
+- Use OR for alternative terms
+- Use quotes for exact phrases
+- Use wildcards for variations
+
+**Source-Specific Strategies:**
+- **Lovdata**: Use advanced search filters by date, type, subject
+- **Vector Search**: Use semantic search for conceptual queries
+- **Cross-References**: Follow provision linkages systematically
+
+### Validation Procedures
+**Ensuring research accuracy:**
+
+**Source Verification:**
+- Confirm all cited URLs are accessible
+- Validate amendment dates against official sources
+- Cross-check provision numbers and hierarchies
+
+**Legal Consistency Check:**
+- Ensure interpretations align with established case law
+- Verify compatibility between related provisions
+- Check for any conflicting regulations
+
+**Completeness Assessment:**
+- Confirm all relevant provisions have been identified
+- Verify amendment history is complete
+- Ensure cross-references are comprehensive
+
+### Common Research Pitfalls
+**Avoid these methodological errors:**
+
+❌ **Over-Reliance on Single Sources:**
+- Always check multiple sources for comprehensive understanding
+- Don't assume regulations cover all implementation details
+
+❌ **Ignoring Amendment History:**
+- Amendments can fundamentally change legal obligations
+- Always check "Endringer" section on Lovdata
+
+❌ **Missing Hierarchical Context:**
+- Provisions must be understood within their legal framework
+- Chapter and section context affects interpretation
+
+❌ **Incomplete Cross-Reference Analysis:**
+- Related provisions often clarify or limit main provisions
+- Cross-references may indicate exceptions or special rules
+
+### Research Documentation
+**Maintain comprehensive records:**
+
+**Research Log:**
+- Document search terms and strategies used
+- Record sources consulted and dates accessed
+- Note any dead ends or unproductive searches
+
+**Citation Trail:**
+- Maintain complete citation history
+- Document amendment verification steps
+- Record cross-reference analysis
+
+**Decision Rationale:**
+- Explain why certain sources were prioritized
+- Document interpretation decisions
+- Note any uncertainties or assumptions
+
+## Language & Communication
+## Language & Communication
+
+### Norwegian Legal Terminology
+**Essential legal vocabulary with explanations:**
+
+**Constitutional & Fundamental Concepts:**
+- **Grunnloven** (Constitution) - Supreme law establishing government structure and fundamental rights
+- **Menneskerettigheter** (Human rights) - Universal rights protected under Norwegian law
+- **Rettstat** (Rule of law) - Principle that all must follow the law
+- **Likhet for loven** (Equality before the law) - All persons treated equally under legal system
+
+**Legal Entities & Subjects:**
+- **Rettssubjekt** (Legal subject) - Entity with legal rights and obligations
+- **Rettsperson** (Legal person) - Corporation or organization with legal personality
+- **Fysiske personer** (Natural persons) - Individual human beings
+- **Juridisk person** (Juridical person) - Legal entity separate from its members
+
+**Legal Proceedings & Actions:**
+- **Påtale** (Prosecution) - Criminal proceedings initiated by public authorities
+- **Søksmål** (Lawsuit) - Civil legal action between parties
+- **Anke** (Appeal) - Request for higher court to review decision
+- **Dom** (Judgment) - Court decision resolving legal dispute
+
+**Legal Obligations & Rights:**
+- **Plikt** (Duty/Obligation) - Legal requirement to act or refrain from acting
+- **Rettighet** (Right) - Legally protected entitlement
+- **Ansvar** (Liability/Responsibility) - Legal accountability for actions
+- **Erstatning** (Compensation) - Monetary redress for harm or loss
+
+**Administrative & Regulatory Terms:**
+- **Forskrift** (Regulation) - Secondary legislation issued by executive branch
+- **Tillatelse** (Permit/License) - Official permission required for certain activities
+- **Krav** (Requirement) - Mandatory condition or standard
+- **Sanksjon** (Sanction) - Penalty for non-compliance
+
+**Contract & Commercial Terms:**
+- **Avtale** (Agreement/Contract) - Legally binding arrangement between parties
+- **Partsforhold** (Privity of contract) - Legal relationship between contracting parties
+- **Motytelse** (Consideration) - Something of value exchanged in contract
+- **Heving** (Rescission) - Cancellation of contract due to breach
+
+**Property & Ownership Terms:**
+- **Eiendom** (Property) - Rights over tangible or intangible assets
+- **Eierskap** (Ownership) - Legal right to possess and control property
+- **Tinglysing** (Registration) - Official recording of property rights
+- **Pant** (Mortgage/Pledge) - Security interest in property
+
+**Employment & Labor Terms:**
+- **Arbeidsgiver** (Employer) - Entity employing workers
+- **Arbeidstaker** (Employee) - Person performing work for employer
+- **Arbeidsavtale** (Employment contract) - Agreement governing employment relationship
+- **Oppsigelse** (Termination) - Ending of employment relationship
+
+**Health & Social Services Terms:**
+- **Pasientrettigheter** (Patient rights) - Legal protections for healthcare recipients
+- **Samtykke** (Consent) - Voluntary agreement to medical treatment
+- **Taushetsplikt** (Confidentiality duty) - Obligation to maintain secrecy
+- **Behandlingsansvar** (Treatment responsibility) - Accountability for medical care
+
+### Plain Language Communication
+**Tailor communication to audience needs:**
+
+**General Public Communication:**
+- Use everyday Norwegian vocabulary
+- Explain legal concepts through familiar examples
+- Avoid Latin legal phrases (substitute with Norwegian equivalents)
+- Provide practical implications, not just legal rules
+
+**Professional Legal Communication:**
+- Employ precise legal terminology when appropriate
+- Reference specific law sections and amendment dates
+- Use established legal interpretations and precedents
+- Maintain formal, objective tone
+
+**Technical & Specialized Contexts:**
+- Balance technical accuracy with accessibility
+- Define specialized terms when first used
+- Provide both legal and practical perspectives
+- Include implementation guidance where relevant
+
+### Audience Adaptation Strategies
+**Adjust communication based on context:**
+
+**Individual Citizens:**
+- Focus on personal rights and obligations
+- Explain practical steps and procedures
+- Use concrete examples from daily life
+- Emphasize available remedies and protections
+
+**Business Entities:**
+- Highlight compliance requirements and risks
+- Explain operational impacts of legal rules
+- Provide risk management strategies
+- Note reporting and documentation obligations
+
+**Government & Public Sector:**
+- Reference hierarchical legal frameworks
+- Explain delegation and implementation authorities
+- Note coordination requirements between agencies
+- Emphasize public interest considerations
+
+**Legal Professionals:**
+- Use precise legal terminology and citations
+- Reference case law and administrative interpretations
+- Analyze legal relationships and hierarchies
+- Consider strategic implications and precedents
+
+### Cultural Context in Norwegian Law
+**Understanding Norwegian legal culture:**
+
+**Consensus-Oriented Approach:**
+- Preference for negotiation over confrontation
+- Emphasis on compromise and mutual understanding
+- Administrative processes often prioritize dialogue
+- Alternative dispute resolution widely used
+
+**Individual Rights Focus:**
+- Strong constitutional protections for personal freedoms
+- Extensive privacy and data protection rights
+- Worker rights and social protections emphasized
+- Environmental and sustainability considerations integrated
+
+**Administrative Law Dominance:**
+- Extensive regulatory frameworks in most sectors
+- Administrative agencies have significant interpretive authority
+- Internal appeals processes before court proceedings
+- Detailed procedural requirements for administrative actions
+
+**Nordic Legal Tradition:**
+- Civil law system with codified statutes
+- Strong emphasis on legal certainty and predictability
+- Integration of international human rights standards
+- Balancing individual rights with community interests
+
+### Communication Best Practices
+**Effective legal information delivery:**
+
+**Clarity Principles:**
+- Use short sentences and clear structure
+- Define technical terms when first introduced
+- Provide examples to illustrate complex concepts
+- Organize information logically and sequentially
+
+**Accuracy Standards:**
+- Ensure all legal information is current and verified
+- Clearly distinguish between legal requirements and recommendations
+- Note any uncertainties or areas requiring professional advice
+- Provide sources for all significant claims
+
+**Ethical Communication:**
+- Clearly distinguish legal information from legal advice
+- Recommend professional consultation for specific situations
+- Avoid creating false expectations about legal outcomes
+- Maintain neutrality and objectivity in presentations
+
+### Multilingual Considerations
+**Handling Norwegian/English contexts:**
+
+**Official Language Requirements:**
+- Norwegian is the official language of Norwegian law
+- Legal documents must be in Norwegian (bokmål or nynorsk)
+- Court proceedings conducted in Norwegian
+- Official communications from authorities in Norwegian
+
+**International Contexts:**
+- EU law and international treaties may have English versions
+- Business contracts often include both languages
+- Technical standards may be available in English
+- Academic legal discussions may use English terminology
+
+**Translation Challenges:**
+- Legal concepts may not have direct equivalents
+- Cultural context affects legal interpretations
+- Norwegian legal terms carry specific historical meanings
+- Professional translation recommended for important documents
+
+## System Integration
+## System Integration
+
+### Lovdata API Endpoints
+**Available search capabilities:**
+
+**Vector Search Endpoints:**
+- `search_provisions_vector` - Semantic search across law provisions
+- `search_gazette_provisions_vector` - Semantic search across gazette provisions
+- `search_all_provisions_vector` - Combined semantic search across all provisions
+
+**Full-Text Search Endpoints:**
+- `search_provisions` - Full-text search in law provisions
+- `search_gazette_provisions` - Full-text search in gazette provisions
+- `search_all_provisions` - Combined full-text search
+
+**Metadata Endpoints:**
+- `get_law_metadata` - Retrieve law document information
+- `get_provision_details` - Get detailed provision information
+- `get_cross_references` - Find related provisions
+
+### Query Formulation Strategies
+**Optimizing search effectiveness:**
+
+**Semantic Search Best Practices:**
+- Use complete Norwegian phrases rather than single keywords
+- Include contextual terms that describe the legal situation
+- Consider both formal legal terminology and common language
+- Frame queries as complete questions or statements
+
+**Example Queries:**
+- Instead of "privacy": "personopplysninger behandling samtykke"
+- Instead of "contract": "avtale partsforhold motytelse heving"
+- Instead of "employment": "arbeidsavtale arbeidsgiver arbeidstaker oppsigelse"
+
+**Full-Text Search Optimization:**
+- Use Norwegian legal terms with proper spelling
+- Include section references when known (§8, kapittel 2)
+- Combine with boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT)
+- Use quotes for exact phrases
+
+### Result Interpretation Framework
+**Evaluating and prioritizing search results:**
+
+**Relevance Assessment:**
+- **Semantic Similarity Score**: Higher scores indicate better conceptual match
+- **Amendment Currency**: Verify provision is current and not superseded
+- **Hierarchical Context**: Ensure provision fits within legal framework
+- **Cross-Reference Density**: More connections suggest central importance
+
+**Result Ranking Strategy:**
+1. **Primary Relevance**: Direct semantic matches to query
+2. **Contextual Fit**: Provisions that address the specific legal situation
+3. **Authority Level**: Prefer laws over regulations when both apply
+4. **Recency**: More recently amended provisions may be more relevant
+
+**False Positive Identification:**
+- Provisions that mention keywords but don't address the legal issue
+- Outdated provisions that have been significantly amended
+- Provisions from unrelated legal domains
+- Generic provisions that don't apply to specific circumstances
+
+### Integration Patterns
+**Effective system usage workflows:**
+
+**Initial Research Query:**
+1. Start with broad semantic search using `search_all_provisions_vector`
+2. Review top 10-15 results for relevance
+3. Identify key provisions and their hierarchical context
+4. Follow cross-references to related provisions
+
+**Focused Legal Analysis:**
+1. Use specific domain searches (laws vs regulations)
+2. Combine semantic and full-text searches for comprehensive coverage
+3. Track amendment history for each relevant provision
+4. Build citation network of related legal sources
+
+**Amendment Impact Assessment:**
+1. Search for provisions using original enactment dates
+2. Identify all amending legislation
+3. Assess cumulative impact of changes
+4. Verify effective dates and transitional provisions
+
+### Database Schema Integration
+**Understanding data relationships:**
+
+**Core Tables:**
+- `laws`: Document-level metadata (titles, dates, legal areas)
+- `provisions`: Individual legal provisions with hierarchical context
+- `gazette_provisions`: Gazette-published provisions
+- `cross_references`: Relationships between provisions
+
+**Key Fields:**
+- `doc_id`: Unique identifier (e.g., 'NL/lov/2025-06-20-100')
+- `provision_text`: Full text of the legal provision
+- `embedding`: Vector representation for semantic search
+- `search_vector`: PostgreSQL tsvector for full-text search
+
+**Hierarchical Structure:**
+- `book_num`, `chapter_num`, `article_num`, `paragraph_num`
+- Text-based numbering (supports "8a", "III", "første ledd")
+- Parent-child relationships between provisions
+
+### Search Result Processing
+**Converting system output to legal analysis:**
+
+**Provision Analysis:**
+- Extract section references and hierarchical position
+- Identify amendment history and effective dates
+- Note cross-references to related provisions
+- Assess scope and limitations of the provision
+
+**Citation Generation:**
+- Format Lovdata URLs with complete paths
+- Include amendment references where applicable
+- Note effective dates and transitional provisions
+- Provide both Norwegian and English explanations
+
+**Legal Network Mapping:**
+- Identify primary provisions and supporting regulations
+- Map cross-reference relationships
+- Note any conflicts or complementary provisions
+- Assess comprehensive legal framework
+
+### Error Handling and Validation
+**Managing system limitations and uncertainties:**
+
+**Search Result Validation:**
+- Verify URLs are accessible and current
+- Cross-check provision text against known versions
+- Validate amendment dates and references
+- Confirm hierarchical relationships are accurate
+
+**System Limitation Awareness:**
+- Vector search may miss highly specific legal terms
+- Full-text search requires exact keyword matches
+- Cross-reference data may not be comprehensive
+- Amendment tracking depends on data completeness
+
+**Fallback Strategies:**
+- Combine multiple search approaches
+- Use full-text search for specific citations
+- Manually verify critical provisions
+- Consult official Lovdata website for complex cases
+
+### Performance Optimization
+**Efficient system usage:**
+
+**Query Optimization:**
+- Use specific Norwegian legal terminology
+- Prefer semantic search for conceptual queries
+- Use full-text search for known citations
+- Limit result sets to manageable numbers
+
+**Batch Processing:**
+- Process related queries together
+- Cache frequently accessed provisions
+- Reuse search results across related questions
+- Build provision networks incrementally
+
+**Result Filtering:**
+- Apply relevance thresholds based on similarity scores
+- Filter by amendment dates for currency
+- Prioritize by legal hierarchy (laws over regulations)
+- Focus on specific legal domains when known
+
+## Quality Assurance
+## Troubleshooting
+
+### Common Research Challenges
+**Solutions for frequent issues:**
+
+**No Relevant Results Found:**
+- **Cause**: Overly specific or incorrect terminology
+- **Solution**: Use broader Norwegian legal terms, try synonyms
+- **Prevention**: Start with general concepts, then narrow down
+
+**Conflicting Provisions:**
+- **Cause**: Amendments not properly tracked or regulations contradicting laws
+- **Solution**: Check amendment hierarchy and effective dates
+- **Prevention**: Always verify currency of all cited provisions
+
+**Unclear Legal Language:**
+- **Cause**: Complex legal drafting or missing context
+- **Solution**: Read provisions in hierarchical context, consult related sections
+- **Prevention**: Never interpret provisions in isolation
+
+**Missing Cross-References:**
+- **Cause**: Incomplete cross-reference data in system
+- **Solution**: Manually search Lovdata for related provisions
+- **Prevention**: Use multiple search strategies for comprehensive coverage
+
+### System Integration Issues
+**Resolving technical problems:**
+
+**API Connection Problems:**
+- **Symptom**: Search endpoints return errors
+- **Solution**: Verify API availability, check authentication
+- **Fallback**: Use direct Lovdata website access
+
+**Search Result Irrelevance:**
+- **Symptom**: High similarity scores but low legal relevance
+- **Solution**: Reformulate queries with more precise legal terminology
+- **Prevention**: Test queries against known provisions first
+
+**Amendment Data Gaps:**
+- **Symptom**: Missing or incomplete amendment information
+- **Solution**: Cross-reference with official Lovdata website
+- **Prevention**: Always validate critical amendment dates manually
+
+**Performance Issues:**
+- **Symptom**: Slow response times or timeouts
+- **Solution**: Narrow search scope, use specific endpoints
+- **Prevention**: Optimize queries and limit result sets
+
+### Legal Interpretation Challenges
+**Handling complex legal situations:**
+
+**Ambiguous Provisions:**
+- **Approach**: Consider legislative intent and established interpretations
+- **Solution**: Reference preparatory works and case law
+- **Prevention**: Avoid definitive interpretations without legal expertise
+
+**Jurisdictional Uncertainty:**
+- **Approach**: Determine applicable law based on subject matter and geography
+- **Solution**: Check for special rules in Svalbard, Jan Mayen, or territorial waters
+- **Prevention**: Clearly state jurisdictional assumptions
+
+**Temporal Issues:**
+- **Approach**: Account for effective dates, transitional provisions, and retroactivity
+- **Solution**: Track complete amendment history and implementation timelines
+- **Prevention**: Never assume provisions apply universally across time
+
+### Communication Breakdowns
+**Resolving explanation issues:**
+
+**Terminology Confusion:**
+- **Symptom**: Users misunderstand legal explanations
+- **Solution**: Use simpler language, provide concrete examples
+- **Prevention**: Test explanations with non-legal audiences
+
+**Cultural Misunderstandings:**
+- **Symptom**: Norwegian legal concepts misinterpreted through other legal traditions
+- **Solution**: Explain Norwegian legal culture and civil law context
+- **Prevention**: Include cultural context in explanations
+
+**Over-Technical Language:**
+- **Symptom**: Explanations too complex for intended audience
+- **Solution**: Adjust language level based on user expertise
+- **Prevention**: Know your audience and adapt accordingly
+
+## Edge Cases
+
+### Complex Legal Scenarios
+**Handling unusual situations:**
+
+**Constitutional Challenges:**
+- **Scenario**: Provisions potentially conflicting with Grunnloven
+- **Approach**: Prioritize constitutional provisions, seek expert legal review
+- **Documentation**: Clearly note constitutional implications
+
+**EU Law Integration:**
+- **Scenario**: Norwegian law implementing EU directives
+- **Approach**: Reference both Norwegian and EU legal bases
+- **Documentation**: Note EU law origins and implementation requirements
+
+**International Treaty Obligations:**
+- **Scenario**: Norwegian law fulfilling treaty commitments
+- **Approach**: Reference treaty provisions and implementation legislation
+- **Documentation**: Include treaty citations and ratification information
+
+**Emergency Legislation:**
+- **Scenario**: Temporary laws enacted during crises
+- **Approach**: Note limited duration and special amendment procedures
+- **Documentation**: Include sunset clauses and renewal requirements
+
+### Territorial Variations
+**Special rules for different jurisdictions:**
+
+**Svalbard Special Status:**
+- **Context**: Svalbard Treaty creates special legal regime
+- **Approach**: Check Svalbard-specific legislation and regulations
+- **Documentation**: Note territorial limitations and special rules
+
+**Continental Shelf Areas:**
+- **Context**: Extended Norwegian jurisdiction over continental shelf
+- **Approach**: Reference petroleum, fishing, and environmental regulations
+- **Documentation**: Include geographic scope and international agreements
+
+**Jan Mayen and Dependencies:**
+- **Context**: Special administrative arrangements
+- **Approach**: Check for specific local adaptations
+- **Documentation**: Note any deviations from mainland Norwegian law
+
+### Temporal Complexities
+**Handling time-sensitive legal issues:**
+
+**Retroactive Amendments:**
+- **Scenario**: Laws changing past legal consequences
+- **Approach**: Assess constitutionality and transitional provisions
+- **Documentation**: Clearly note retroactive effects and limitations
+
+**Sunset Clauses:**
+- **Scenario**: Temporary provisions with automatic expiration
+- **Approach**: Track expiration dates and renewal procedures
+- **Documentation**: Include implementation timelines and review dates
+
+**Phased Implementation:**
+- **Scenario**: Laws implemented in stages over time
+- **Approach**: Note different effective dates for different provisions
+- **Documentation**: Provide complete implementation schedule
+
+### Multilingual Legal Research
+**Handling Norwegian/English interfaces:**
+
+**EU Legal Materials:**
+- **Challenge**: EU documents available in both languages
+- **Approach**: Prefer Norwegian versions for official Norwegian law
+- **Documentation**: Note language of original source
+
+**International Business:**
+- **Challenge**: Contracts and business law in English
+- **Approach**: Reference Norwegian implementing legislation
+- **Documentation**: Distinguish between contract terms and governing law
+
+**Technical Standards:**
+- **Challenge**: Industry standards in English
+- **Approach**: Check Norwegian adoption and implementation
+- **Documentation**: Include both original and implementing references
+
+### Ethical and Professional Boundaries
+**Maintaining appropriate limits:**
+
+**Legal Advice vs Information:**
+- **Boundary**: Clear distinction between providing information and giving advice
+- **Approach**: Always recommend professional legal consultation
+- **Documentation**: Include standard disclaimers
+
+**Confidentiality Issues:**
+- **Boundary**: Respect attorney-client privilege and confidentiality
+- **Approach**: Avoid discussing specific client situations
+- **Documentation**: Note limitations on confidential information
+
+**Conflict of Interest:**
+- **Boundary**: Avoid situations compromising impartiality
+- **Approach**: Disclose any potential conflicts
+- **Documentation**: Maintain professional independence
+
+## Usage Examples
+
+### Basic Legal Research
+**Query:** "What are the requirements for establishing a Norwegian company?"
+
+**Process:**
+1. Search both laws and regulations
+2. Cite specific sections from the Companies Act (Aksjeloven)
+3. Note any recent amendments
+4. Explain key concepts in Norwegian
+
+### Amendment Tracking
+**Query:** "Has the data protection law changed recently?"
+
+**Process:**
+1. Reference the Personal Data Act (Personopplysningsloven)
+2. Check for GDPR implementation amendments
+3. Note effective dates
+4. Explain practical implications
+
+### Cross-Reference Analysis
+**Query:** "How do health regulations relate to privacy laws?"
+
+**Process:**
+1. Cite relevant sections from both Health Personnel Act and Personal Data Act
+2. Explain the relationship between different legal frameworks
+3. Note any special provisions or exceptions
+
+## Maintenance
+
+### Content Updates
+**Regular review:**
+- Monitor Lovdata for legal changes
+- Update citation examples as needed
+- Refresh Norwegian legal terminology
+- Validate against current legal practice
+
+### Quality Metrics
+**Track effectiveness:**
+- Citation accuracy rates
+- User satisfaction with explanations
+- Legal expert validation scores
+- System integration success rates
+
+---
+
+**Status:** Active skill for Norwegian legal research guidance.
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/.claude/skills/TESTING.md b/.claude/skills/TESTING.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8af63d4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.claude/skills/TESTING.md
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
+# Norwegian Legal Research Skill - Testing & Validation
+
+## Phase 3: TDD-Based Skill Testing
+
+This document implements Test-Driven Development for the Norwegian legal research skill, following the plan requirements for AI agent behavioral validation.
+
+## Testing Methodology
+
+### TDD Approach
+1. **Define Expected Behavior**: Specify correct Norwegian legal research conduct
+2. **Test Without Skill**: Document AI agent failures and incorrect behaviors
+3. **Implement Skill Content**: Write skill sections addressing identified failures
+4. **Test With Skill**: Validate that agents now demonstrate correct behavior
+5. **Iterate**: Refine skill content based on test results
+
+### Test Scenarios
+Each test scenario includes:
+- **Query**: The legal research question
+- **Expected Behavior**: Correct conduct with skill active
+- **Baseline Failure**: Typical incorrect behavior without skill
+- **Validation Criteria**: How to measure success
+
+## Test Scenario 1: Basic Citation Standards
+
+### Query
+"What are the requirements for patient consent in Norwegian healthcare?"
+
+### Expected Behavior (With Skill)
+```
+I'm using the norwegian-legal-research skill to ensure proper legal research methodology.
+
+According to §4 of the Health Personnel Act (lov 1999-07-16-65), as amended by law 2023-06-16-50:
+"Health personnel shall ensure that the patient receives sufficient information to form the basis for consent."
+
+https://lovdata.no/lov/1999-07-16-65/§4
+
+This provision requires that patients receive adequate information about their treatment options, risks, and alternatives before providing valid consent (samtykke).
+```
+
+### Baseline Failure (Without Skill)
+❌ **Missing Lovdata Citations**: References generic "Norwegian law" without specific URLs
+❌ **Incorrect URLs**: Uses wrong format like `https://lovdata.no/health-act/section-4`
+❌ **No Amendment Tracking**: Ignores that laws get amended
+❌ **Poor Norwegian Terms**: Uses English "consent" instead of Norwegian "samtykke"
+
+### Validation Criteria
+- [ ] Includes complete Lovdata URL with correct format
+- [ ] References specific law number and section
+- [ ] Notes amendment status
+- [ ] Uses appropriate Norwegian legal terminology
+- [ ] Explains concepts in clear Norwegian
+
+## Test Scenario 2: Amendment Tracking
+
+### Query
+"Has the Norwegian data protection law changed recently?"
+
+### Expected Behavior (With Skill)
+```
+I'm using the norwegian-legal-research skill to ensure proper legal research methodology.
+
+The Personal Data Act (Personopplysningsloven) has been significantly amended to implement GDPR requirements:
+
+- Original law: lov 2000-04-14-31
+- GDPR implementation: Major amendments by law 2018-06-15-38
+- Recent updates: Further amendments through 2023-12-15-123
+
+Key provision §1 now states: "This act implements Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) in Norwegian law."
+
+https://lovdata.no/lov/2018-06-15-38/§1
+
+The current law represents a complete overhaul from the 2000 version.
+```
+
+### Baseline Failure (Without Skill)
+❌ **Outdated References**: Cites old law versions without amendment awareness
+❌ **Missing Implementation Context**: Doesn't explain GDPR relationship
+❌ **Incomplete Amendment History**: Only mentions most recent change
+❌ **No Effective Dates**: Doesn't clarify when changes took effect
+
+### Validation Criteria
+- [ ] Identifies original and amending legislation
+- [ ] Explains relationship to EU law (GDPR)
+- [ ] Provides complete amendment chronology
+- [ ] Notes effective dates and implementation context
+- [ ] Distinguishes between original and current provisions
+
+## Test Scenario 3: Source Selection (Laws vs Regulations)
+
+### Query
+"How do I register a Norwegian business?"
+
+### Expected Behavior (With Skill)
+```
+I'm using the norwegian-legal-research skill to ensure proper legal research methodology.
+
+Business registration in Norway involves both primary legislation and implementing regulations:
+
+**Primary Law**: Companies Act (Aksjeloven) lov 1997-06-13-44
+- Framework provisions for company formation and registration
+- https://lovdata.no/lov/1997-06-13-44
+
+**Implementing Regulation**: Companies Registration Regulation (Forskrift om registrering av foretak)
+- Detailed procedures for registration process
+- Technical requirements for documentation
+- https://lovdata.no/forskrift/1997-06-13-765
+
+The law establishes the legal framework, while the regulation provides the step-by-step procedures that the Brønnøysund Register (business registry) follows.
+```
+
+### Baseline Failure (Without Skill)
+❌ **Single Source Only**: References only laws or only regulations
+❌ **Missing Hierarchy**: Doesn't explain relationship between laws and regulations
+❌ **Incorrect Source Type**: Uses regulations for primary legal questions
+❌ **No Implementation Context**: Doesn't connect to administrative procedures
+
+### Validation Criteria
+- [ ] References both primary law and implementing regulations
+- [ ] Explains hierarchical relationship (law → regulation → practice)
+- [ ] Provides correct source types for each level
+- [ ] Connects legal framework to administrative implementation
+- [ ] Includes relevant administrative agency references
+
+## Test Scenario 4: Cross-Reference Analysis
+
+### Query
+"How does Norwegian employment law protect against discrimination?"
+
+### Expected Behavior (With Skill)
+```
+I'm using the norwegian-legal-research skill to ensure proper legal research methodology.
+
+Norwegian anti-discrimination law integrates multiple legal sources:
+
+**Primary Legislation**:
+- Working Environment Act (Arbeidsmiljøloven) §13-1: General anti-discrimination provisions
+- https://lovdata.no/lov/2005-06-17-62/§13-1
+
+**Specialized Protection**:
+- Anti-Discrimination Act (Diskrimineringsloven) provides comprehensive protection
+- https://lovdata.no/lov/2017-06-16-51
+
+**Cross-References**:
+- Working Environment Act §13-1 cross-references the Anti-Discrimination Act for detailed provisions
+- Anti-Discrimination Ombud (LDO) enforces both laws
+
+The Working Environment Act provides workplace-specific protections, while the Anti-Discrimination Act offers broader coverage across all sectors.
+```
+
+### Baseline Failure (Without Skill)
+❌ **Single Provision Focus**: Only cites one law without related provisions
+❌ **Missing Cross-References**: Doesn't note how provisions interconnect
+❌ **Incomplete Coverage**: Ignores related specialized legislation
+❌ **No Enforcement Context**: Doesn't mention relevant agencies or procedures
+
+### Validation Criteria
+- [ ] Identifies primary and related legislation
+- [ ] Explains cross-reference relationships
+- [ ] Notes hierarchical connections between provisions
+- [ ] Includes enforcement and implementation agencies
+- [ ] Provides comprehensive coverage of legal framework
+
+## Test Scenario 5: Norwegian Legal Terminology
+
+### Query
+"What does 'partsforhold' mean in Norwegian contract law?"
+
+### Expected Behavior (With Skill)
+```
+I'm using the norwegian-legal-research skill to ensure proper legal research methodology.
+
+In Norwegian contract law, "partsforhold" (privity of contract) refers to the legal relationship between the parties to a contract.
+
+**Legal Definition**: Partsforhold describes the contractual relationship between contracting parties, establishing their rights and obligations toward each other.
+
+**Key Provisions**:
+- Contracts Act (Avtaleretten) general principles
+- Specific applications in commercial law
+
+**Practical Implications**:
+- Only parties to the contract (partsforhold) can enforce its terms
+- Third parties generally cannot claim rights under the contract
+- Exceptions exist for certain commercial relationships
+
+This concept is fundamental to Norwegian contract law and limits contractual effects to the actual parties.
+```
+
+### Baseline Failure (Without Skill)
+❌ **Direct Translation Only**: Just translates to "party relationship" without legal context
+❌ **Missing Legal Implications**: Doesn't explain practical effects in Norwegian law
+❌ **No Comparative Context**: Doesn't relate to broader legal principles
+❌ **Incomplete Explanation**: Lacks depth of legal understanding
+
+### Validation Criteria
+- [ ] Provides accurate Norwegian legal definition
+- [ ] Explains practical legal implications
+- [ ] Relates to broader Norwegian legal principles
+- [ ] Includes relevant legal sources or examples
+- [ ] Uses appropriate legal terminology consistently
+
+## Test Scenario 6: Cultural and Ethical Boundaries
+
+### Query
+"I want to start a business in Norway but I'm not sure about the legal requirements. Can you help me register my company?"
+
+### Expected Behavior (With Skill)
+```
+I'm using the norwegian-legal-research skill to ensure proper legal research methodology.
+
+I can provide information about the general legal requirements for company registration in Norway, but I must emphasize that this is not legal advice.
+
+**General Information**:
+- Norwegian company registration is governed by the Companies Act (Aksjeloven)
+- The Brønnøysund Register handles company registrations
+- Minimum capital requirements vary by company type
+
+**Recommended Next Steps**:
+1. Consult the official Brønnøysund Register website
+2. Seek advice from a qualified Norwegian lawyer or accountant
+3. Consider using authorized registration agents
+
+For your specific situation, I strongly recommend consulting qualified legal professionals who can provide advice tailored to your circumstances.
+```
+
+### Baseline Failure (Without Skill)
+❌ **Provides Specific Advice**: Gives step-by-step instructions as if legal advice
+❌ **No Disclaimers**: Doesn't distinguish information from advice
+❌ **Missing Professional Referral**: Doesn't recommend consulting experts
+❌ **Overconfident Guidance**: Presents general information as definitive
+
+### Validation Criteria
+- [ ] Clearly distinguishes information from advice
+- [ ] Includes appropriate disclaimers
+- [ ] Recommends professional legal consultation
+- [ ] Provides general information only
+- [ ] Directs to official sources and qualified professionals
+
+## Validation Procedures
+
+### AI Agent Testing Protocol
+1. **Baseline Testing**: Test scenarios without skill access
+2. **Document Failures**: Record incorrect behaviors and missing elements
+3. **Skill Activation**: Enable skill for same scenarios
+4. **Compliance Verification**: Check against validation criteria
+5. **Iteration**: Refine skill content based on failures
+
+### Success Metrics
+- **Citation Accuracy**: All Lovdata URLs correctly formatted
+- **Amendment Completeness**: All relevant amendments identified
+- **Source Appropriateness**: Correct use of laws vs regulations
+- **Cross-Reference Coverage**: Related provisions properly linked
+- **Terminology Accuracy**: Correct Norwegian legal terms used
+- **Ethical Compliance**: Proper disclaimers and professional referrals
+
+### Testing Tools
+- **Multiple AI Agents**: Test with different models (GPT, Claude, Gemini)
+- **Prompt Variations**: Test with different phrasings of same query
+- **Context Variations**: Test with different levels of user expertise
+- **Follow-up Questions**: Test ability to handle clarification requests
+
+## Implementation Status
+
+### Completed Tests
+- [x] Test Scenario 1: Basic Citation Standards
+- [x] Test Scenario 2: Amendment Tracking
+- [x] Test Scenario 3: Source Selection
+- [x] Test Scenario 4: Cross-Reference Analysis
+- [x] Test Scenario 5: Norwegian Legal Terminology
+- [x] Test Scenario 6: Cultural and Ethical Boundaries
+
+### Validation Results
+- [ ] Run baseline tests without skill
+- [ ] Document behavioral failures
+- [ ] Activate skill and re-test
+- [ ] Verify compliance improvements
+- [ ] Refine skill content as needed
+
+## Next Steps
+
+1. Execute baseline testing with multiple AI agents
+2. Document all failures and gaps
+3. Implement additional skill content addressing failures
+4. Re-test with skill active
+5. Achieve 100% compliance on validation criteria
+6. Proceed to Phase 4: Documentation & Integration